Chuck Todd Signs Off As Moderator Of 'Meet The Press,' Successor Kristen Welker
Last edited Sun Sep 10, 2023, 12:25 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: Deadline
September 10, 2023 8:39am
UPDATE: Chuck Todd signed on of his final broadcast as moderator of NBC Newss Meet the Press by handing his successor, Kristen Welker, a reliable alarm clock and telling viewers that hell be focusing on network projects tied to bridging the political divide.
Welker appeared in the final minutes of Sundays show, with a montage of her asking hard-hitting questions at a presidential debate in 2020 and of other notable figures.
You have left very big shoes to fill and I just want to make you proud, Welker told Todd.
I take this responsibility so seriously, Welker said. I am ready because you have helped me get ready, Chuck. Youre someone who invests in the people who you care about and you have invested in me, and I am just so eternally grateful for that. She credited Todd for bringing her to D.C. and teaching her just about everything I know about politics.
Read more: https://deadline.com/2023/09/chuck-todd-meet-the-press-sign-off-1235542336/
He's gone (most of the sources have nothing but video clips of it vs stories at post time). Should have happened YEARS ago. Good riddance!
Full new headline: Chuck Todd Signs Off As Moderator Of Meet The Press, Successor Kristen Welker Says Shell Approach New Role As A Reporter
Article updated.
Original article/headline -
September 10, 2023 7:55am
Chuck Todd opened his final broadcast as moderator of NBC Newss Meet the Press by telling viewers that it was an understatement to call the gig an honor and privilege of my lifetime.
This is simply the pinnacle of political journalism, something my younger self never would have imagined, said Todd, who announced in June that he was stepping down from the role.
No matter how much of a grind that the current political climate is, wearing my down on any given day, I still always have had a pinch me, I cant believe it feeling every time I hear my name introduced as the moderator of the longest running show in the history of television. In fact, I used to joke my goal is not to be the last moderator of the longest running show in American history, and I have achieved that goal and then some.
Kristen Welker will succeed Todd as moderator next week. When she does, all of the major networks Sunday morning shows will have a woman as moderator or co-moderator for the first time.
milestogo
(23,060 posts)Leave, that is.
Jilly_in_VA
(14,344 posts)I'll play "Thankf God and Greyhound You're Gone" when I see he actually is. Same for Mitchell.
Duncanpup
(15,651 posts)bucolic_frolic
(55,044 posts)and would have benefited from theoretical pillars of poli sci - Pol Thoughtt 1500 - Present, American Political Thought. I didn't watch him a lot but never heard reference to any political philosophers of the Enlightenment. To my ear he was like a pol masquerading in the political middle with gossipy schmoozing skills but never asking the hard questions because he just didn't understand their significance. Maybe it's just me.
Puppyjive
(984 posts)I would have never thought that one could attain such status without at least a 4 year degree. But then, we have Mark Meadows, the holder of an associate degree, dang near running the country. I agree there is something lacking from these individuals, and it shows.
bucolic_frolic
(55,044 posts)2 years gives you ego and skills, perhaps.
hlthe2b
(113,844 posts)time in a particularly bizarre way (to my ear) almost staccato at times, trailing off the end of the point that he seemingly didn't want to emphasize but in what I guess was supposed to sound erudite. It didn't to me.
One thing that never changed was his "beltway-driven conventional wisdom" -- nearly always based on Republican memes.
NO loss. I just wish that I had more confidence that Kristen Welker will not be just as bad or worse. She has rolled over countless times for Trump in her reporting and was Todd's mentee after all.
msfiddlestix
(8,178 posts)I couldn't stomach how she presented questions in countless appearances breathless reporting from the white house while trump was in office.
a few appearances on set conducting interviews left me underwhelmed.
Not exactly as bad as Todd who I always perceived as another clueless narcisists, but not that much better.
For Welker, it's that thing some of us women have done from time to time with working harder to seem cogent, focused and erudite. I can smpathize why that's the case, cuz women have to work so much harder to be better than counterparts.
But in my book, Psaki has what it takes hands down. Don't know why they didn't put her in that slot.
JHB
(38,176 posts)Walter Cronkite dropped out of college in his junior year, I don't know if Mike Royko got a degree but if he did it would have been a 2-year associates degree.
It's not the degree, it's the instincts, the tenacity, and the research/reporting habits. Chuck Todd doesn't have those, and the path he took to success, where he never had to go in-depth with anything, allowed him to never learn them.
FakeNoose
(41,522 posts)Instincts and personality quirks, for lack of a better word. Chuck Todd has shown us time and again that he never had the training or the dogged determination of a real journalist.
Carl Bernstein's autobiography that he wrote a few years ago - there's an example of a political journalist learning the ropes and becoming a great reporter along the way. He never earned a college degree either, but no one would ever question his credentials.
justaprogressive
(6,888 posts)AND THE NATIVE INTELLIGENCE!
Paladin
(32,354 posts)usaf-vet
(7,803 posts)Let's see what history has to say about his time in the chair.
My guess is it won't be as glowing a review as this one.
SouthernDem4ever
(6,619 posts)I hope it's really happening this time!
Meadowoak
(6,606 posts)303squadron
(813 posts)an important and penetrating follow up question to this topic but I'm channelling my Chuck Todd.
ificandream
(11,836 posts)No matter what he did, people would criticize. Being a journalist means you ask difficult questions - questions not only your subject doesn't want to hear but also your audience (unless you're Fox). It's a difficult job and one he did well. (P.S. I worked in newspapers for over 35 years.)
BumRushDaShow
(169,376 posts)(and I'll add "flag pin" Stephanopoulos as his runner up) and he has been a "known" entity before that gig.
You can ask "difficult questions" but then when you get a gish gallop answer in return, if you were just a "news anchor", then you could "leave it at that". But he wasn't a "news anchor". He was supposed to be a host of a show that went beyond that and was designed to tease out more.
If NBC had handcuffed him to a policy of no follow-ups, then that is one thing. But if you compare to someone like a Christian Amonpour, it's like day and night!
agingdem
(8,835 posts)Chuck Todd is a lightweight...his tenure was all about access...he, Andrea, and the Morning Joe bunch had a visceral hatred for the Clintons, Hillary in particular (never mind, she was the most qualified)..so they cleaned up their party buddy, a crude know-nothing tv clown and sold him as a serious candidate, worthy of the office..once it became obvious Trump was a vile sadistic know-nothing revenge-fueled psychopath, Joe and Mika rebranded themselves as "never-Trump".. but Chuck Todd (and Andrea Mitchell) remained neutral, preferring access to Trump, his inner circle, and MAGA congressional cretins...he offered them a "safe place"..softball interviews, no follow-ups, "both sides" garbage...
so bye bye to Chuck..he won't be missed...maybe now NBC will have the balls to rid the airwaves of Andrea Mitchell...
PCIntern
(28,341 posts)👍👍👍
TheRealNorth
(9,647 posts)They sold out their profession to get "access" to Republican politicians by pitching softballs and echoing Republican propaganda and talking points.
ZonkerHarris
(25,577 posts)ificandream
(11,836 posts)NBC is a legitimate news outlet (unlike Fox). They have standards. And if he did not live up to them, he'd have been gone.
ZonkerHarris
(25,577 posts)ificandream
(11,836 posts)agingdem
(8,835 posts)I have two words for you...Andrea Mitchell..
and before I get accused of ageism...I'm 75...
ificandream
(11,836 posts)NBC has a decades-long reputation for ethics and good journalism. (Not every network is Fox.) Mitchell has a good reputation. Compare her to the clowns at Fox. She's much better than any of them. The memes against her and Todd are internet memes. I would be amazed if even a small percent of those criticicizing her has any connection with news. Journalism is more than yelling at your subject or doing gotcha questions. The problem, as I've said numerous times, is that Fox muddied the waters about what good journalism is. Real journalism isn't what you always want it to be. It's what it should be -- the story told without bias. NBC does real journalism.
2naSalit
(102,628 posts)Fla Dem
(27,618 posts)Chuck should have been prepared to list all the Biden administrations accomplishments in the 2½ years he's been President. Instead, he just moved on.
Link to tweet
?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
ashredux
(2,927 posts)IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,307 posts)... RIP Robin Williams aka Mork
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,307 posts)... good riddance!
(It's Sunday morning, and I am trying to be polite)
KS Toronado
(23,727 posts)

BumRushDaShow
(169,376 posts)Jarqui
(10,906 posts)In term of opportunity? Maybe.
Tim Russert had it up there.
In terms of what Chuck Todd did with the opportunity?
Chuck made sure it would never be regarded as "the pinnacle of political journalism"
KPN
(17,363 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Roy Rolling
(7,626 posts)Is your point that criticism of Todds lack of professional skills as an A-list journalist should be ignored as mundane, political tripe?
The people criticizing Todd here are those who value professional journalism and broadcast ethics. I wont like anybody who succeeds Todd if theyre bums, but I will not criticize Welker unless she fits those shoes, not just sits in the anchor seat.
Im sure you meant superficial people
😉
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)...which tends to be "someone who doesn't express my viewpoint clearly DISAGREES with my viewpoint". I don't find Todd's reporting and interviewing style to be "right wing" or expressing a "pro-Republican viewpoint."
More significantly, I'm at a loss to undertstand why so many people here seem to watch him regularly enough to know what he apparent bias is.
Elessar Zappa
(16,385 posts)its that he doesnt ask tough follow up questions. Also he tends to both side most topics on his show. I dont buy into the idea that the mainstream media is biased toward Republicans but I dont think Chuck Todd is a good fit for Meet the Press.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)I've seen that complaint applied to pretty much every news personality who does interviews. For some reason, Todd comes in for extra disdain.
Elessar Zappa
(16,385 posts)paleotn
(22,181 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,376 posts)but someone who will use some brain cells and at least have enough "background" on the topic being discussed, that they can tease out some revelations that are not just regurgitation of the "talking points of the day".
And enough clips of his nonsense have been shown and written about by OTHER media, both broadcast and print, depending on who was a guest, that you didn't even have to watch the whole thing to see there was a problem.
This was the perfect example posted upthread -
Link to tweet
@MeetThePress
·
Follow
WATCH: Would @SenBillCassidy (R-La.) consider joining or supporting a No Labels 2024 presidential ticket?
Cassidy: Depending on who the candidates were.
@chucktodd: Were looking at Biden and Trump.
Cassidy: If they came and spoke to me, I would speak to them back."
11:26 AM · Sep 10, 2023
What was the follow-up/fact-checking for the load of CT that the loon Cassidy put out there?
Answer: There was NONE. He praised him for being "never afraid to answer a question" and left that bullshit out there.
paleotn
(22,181 posts)He has no problem with "alternative facts."
msfiddlestix
(8,178 posts)I don't find Todd's reporting and interviewing style to be "right wing" or expressing a...
"pro-Republican viewpoint."
I believe you said this with all sincerity.
Faux pas
(16,343 posts)Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)sheshe2
(97,484 posts)bluedigger
(17,433 posts)SWBTATTReg
(26,252 posts)am glad I quit. From the constant remarks I heard over the years about his performance (tainted, not impartial), I'm glad I did stop watching. A good thing as I went to other news outlets/sources for my news, and not be endlessly subjected to propaganda.
BumRushDaShow
(169,376 posts)and even then, when trying to listen to a weekly gardening show that aired 8 - 10 on Sunday mornings on the radio (WOR, that I could pick up here in Philly), NBC shoved it aside to put that one's arrogant smarmy chatter on my radio as a simulcast -
Schmuck was already going to be a non-starter in any event once Gregory was finally given the boot.
TNNurse
(7,537 posts)BunnyMcGee
(483 posts)Loryn
(1,046 posts)paleotn
(22,181 posts)I guess that fits. More like enabler and un-challenger to me. Spew whatever untrue crap you want. Todd didn't care.
IcyPeas
(25,440 posts)Well that's laughable.
BaronChocula
(4,528 posts)The fact that he's stuck on the false notion of a "political divide" where there are two sides engaged in intransigence shows why he's wasn't cut out for news. The fact is that one side refuses to acknowledge the truth and has become a cult. There's no bridging a divide. For his relative youth, Todd is a relic and NEEDS to be put out to pasture.
Glorfindel
(10,175 posts)hat I haven't watched a single minute of it since I got big enough to say, "No," to my father and grandfather, who insisted hat I must watch it. Lawrence E. Spivak was the (what?...host, moderator?) at that time. I didn't like him either.
Mblaze
(1,015 posts)Evolve Dammit
(21,766 posts)dobleremolque
(1,120 posts)of self-congratu-bation. Ugh.
gfwzig
(152 posts)Last edited Sun Sep 10, 2023, 04:15 PM - Edit history (1)
this jerk has been a repug mouthpiece for so long that he is no longer a legit journalist,,, also he has been auditioning for Faux news for years,,,, Mr no follow-up question after his guest spouts repug talking points,,, how I can go on but I'm just glad he's gone, Welker has a couple chances to prove herself or I'll not watch her either.....
montanacowboy
(6,712 posts)she will not improve that show
maybe time to trash can the whole thing
BumRushDaShow
(169,376 posts)but having watched her doing moderation of that 2nd and final 2020 Presidential debate, I didn't cringe in horror like I did with the shit-show of Chris Wallace's 1st debate's hot mess.
happy feet
(1,278 posts)I still won't watch
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)Lunabell
(7,309 posts)Chuck Todd (R) Signs Off As Moderator Of 'Meet The Press,' Successor Kristen Welker.
Upthevibe
(10,172 posts)This guy has been horrible!
Now if they can just get rid of Andrea Mitchell!
Rorey
(8,514 posts)Maybe I'll start watching again.
llashram
(6,269 posts)to fill...Todd has always been a coward