Two Maine news anchors quit on air, citing pressure to do biased journalism
Source: NY Daily News
Maine news anchors Tony Consiglio and Cindy Michaels' resignation didn't surprise company Vice President and General Manager Mike Palmer, who called it "unfortunate." Michaels said the pair were expected to do unbalanced political journalism.
* * *
Its a little complicated, Michaels continued, but we were expected to do somewhat unbalanced news, politically, in general.
Neither anchor specified what political stances the management allegedly wanted them to espouse.
Unlike others at the station, the companys vice president and general manager, Mike Palmer, was not surprised by their announcement.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2-maine-news-anchors-quit-air-article-1.1206187
The folks at Free Republic are celebrating this resignation accusing this pair of wanting to push liberal (fact based) journalism. In Ohio, several ABC affiliates that were owned by Sinclair were forced to broadcast a highly partisan attack on President Obama as a news special:
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/sinclair_broadcast_group_ohio_anti-obama_special.php
This just goes to show that we need to hold the media accountable and that Fox News is not the only outlet that is pushing a right wing agenda. Fox News is just the most obvious about it.
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)It is really sad.
Only a few remain pure concerning the truth.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)and conscience seems to be very rare in the "news" industry these days.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 22, 2012, 07:31 PM - Edit history (1)
and of how the news was broadcast back then.
Seriously.
somberly.
News was reported, not created, on air.
Cronkite was rated "the most trusted man in America".
Mainstream news today is a sad joke.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Bring back real journalism!
crim son
(27,464 posts)as her son is the same age as my oldest boy. Smart woman, I don't know where she stands politically and since I don't watch t.v. have not paid much attention to what her station broadcasts. Still, I stand on the side of unbiased journalism, period. Loving how they did this on the air.
Michigan-Arizona
(762 posts)Could not hardly find more than 3 people that was there in favor of Bush. Hubby & I watched the local news that night & almost fell over when they said the protest was about 50/50. We both just said out loud to each other what liars!
Joe Bacon
(5,163 posts)That's the first step.
The second step is to reinstate ownership limits and break up the six companies that own the American media.
cstanleytech
(26,276 posts)Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)...or take a cue from FDR and start a movement to add justices to the 9 (no number specified by the Constitution--perfectly legal and constitutional to create more judges for a better balanced court).
Though FDR's tactic didn't succeed in adding judges, the pressure he put on the court caused one justice to change his mind about "New Deal" programs--thus Social Security was saved from being declared "unconstitutional"!
Without FDR's threat, we wouldn't have Social Security today! We may not have it long--unless we have a successful leftist democracy revolution here, such as the one occurring in South America--but three quarters of a century is a pretty long run for workers communal insurance in a country now dominated by Corporate Looters and War Profiteers!
If we can get rid of the 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines and elect a real Congress, the Fairness Doctrine and other common sense, basic "good government" laws will be possible. Why give up the fight before we have begun, cuz we're so-o-o sca-a-ared of the Supreme Court and other evil forces?
Nothing is gained without struggle. No good idea has ever been enacted without a fight--often bloody fights, deep cultural struggles, bashed protestor heads and worse, and also courageous and foxy leaders to get things done.
RESTORE THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE! BUST CORPORATE MEDIA MONOPOLIES NOW!
cstanleytech
(26,276 posts)a justice making a ruling you disagree with isnt an impeachable offense, if it was then every justice on the court would have already been removed for issuing rulings others disagree with.
The adding more spots might work but.............. *shrug*
As for corporate issue of them donating (bribing) candidates with secret money to things like the PACs the best way we can fight that right now imo is make it so all donations to the PACs are open and cannot be hidden and make it illegal for one PAC to channel money to another PAC in an attempt to hide the trail.
Volaris
(10,269 posts)is the best way to curtail the influence of the "evil liberal media". I just bet that they are dumb enough to fall for it, too. Rush won't be, but we just have to say at the outset that anyone NOT in agreement with this policy has a vested interest (see money) in maintaining the status quo, and doesn't care about actually keeping people properly informed. Rush and Beck (and most of FoxNews) would scream like stuck pigs, but that would just re-inforce the argument, wouldn't it?
They do so love it when Big Government works in THEIR favor, I say let's use that disconnect to our full advantage lol.
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)eyewall
(674 posts)and integrity.
upi402
(16,854 posts)they don't have many places to go.
Courage and ethics - that's what it sounds like.
We'll need law with teeth and serious penalties to undo this paradigm now.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)Gee, I wonder which direction the imbalance was?