Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,722 posts)
Mon Oct 23, 2023, 07:36 PM Oct 2023

Court will decide if Trump has presidential immunity against E. Jean Carroll's 2019 damage claims

Source: ABC News

October 23, 2023, 3:49 PM


A three-judge panel will consider whether former President Donald Trump can claim presidential immunity against damages sought by the writer E. Jean Carroll for remarks he made about her in 2019.

Carroll, a former Elle magazine columnist, sued Trump in November 2019 over comments he made shortly after Carroll publicly accused him of raping her in a Manhattan department store dressing room in the 1990s. In statements Trump made denying the accusation, Trump said Carroll was "not my type" and suggested she fabricated her accusation for ulterior and improper purposes, including to increase sales of her then-forthcoming book.

In a hearing Monday, the three-judge panel from the First U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals asked Trump's attorneys why Trump did not raise a presidential immunity defense earlier in the case. "Why not?" Judge Maria Kahn asked during oral argument. An attorney for Trump, Michael Madaio, argued the judiciary cannot foreclose the possibility the former president would want to defend himself by invoking an immunity defense. Otherwise, Madaio said, "separation of powers would be weakened."

An attorney for Carroll, Joshua Matz, called that argument "hokum" and pointed out how Trump had ample time to raise presidential immunity but instead invoked other defenses. "A party who believes they are hanging onto immunity does not behave the way it behaved," Matz said.

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-seek-presidential-immunity-jean-carrolls-2019-damage/story?id=104220717

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court will decide if Trump has presidential immunity against E. Jean Carroll's 2019 damage claims (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Oct 2023 OP
The only immunity he appears to have..... getagrip_already Oct 2023 #1
Do these lawyers actually hear themselves? ananda Oct 2023 #2
I know! Right? I think these arguments are to make his ignorant base believe that they're doing something. Oopsie Daisy Oct 2023 #19
He wasn't even president then. JohnSJ Oct 2023 #3
Yes he was, gab13by13 Oct 2023 #8
It occurred in 1996 JohnSJ Oct 2023 #11
I thought this was already adjudicated slightlv Oct 2023 #4
Delay Delay Delay are the only words tRump knows. BigmanPigman Oct 2023 #5
I thought this had already been resolved...since Trump made additional comments after leaving office. brooklynite Oct 2023 #6
The first case was never resolved, gab13by13 Oct 2023 #9
I recall Carroll amending the complaint in the first suit after the second was adjudicated.... brooklynite Oct 2023 #10
The appeal is being heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, not the First Circuit onenote Oct 2023 #7
Do they have to take a case that stupid? SouthernDem4ever Oct 2023 #12
It would be unusual to dismiss an appeal without briefing and oral argument onenote Oct 2023 #13
Thanks for the info SouthernDem4ever Oct 2023 #17
I think that is a stretch for Presidential immunity but that's just my opinion. cstanleytech Oct 2023 #14
The judges should throw this argument out on its ear ificandream Oct 2023 #15
Still a damn rapist with small fingers ! - bobby202 Oct 2023 #16
Hasn't this already been decided? Like, more than once? Novara Oct 2023 #18
Apply interest to the $5 mil. Inflate it for the 7 trillion deficit he caused. mpcamb Oct 2023 #20

getagrip_already

(17,802 posts)
1. The only immunity he appears to have.....
Mon Oct 23, 2023, 07:45 PM
Oct 2023

Is an inherent immunity to making an incoherent claim in his defense.

Being a federal officer doesn't protect you from charges when you callously smear someone's reputation after you rape them.

Sorry, that has nothing to do with the duties of office.

Now run along and change your diaper.

Oopsie Daisy

(6,670 posts)
19. I know! Right? I think these arguments are to make his ignorant base believe that they're doing something.
Tue Oct 24, 2023, 07:38 AM
Oct 2023

gab13by13

(32,317 posts)
8. Yes he was,
Mon Oct 23, 2023, 10:08 PM
Oct 2023

this is actually Carroll's first lawsuit. Merrick Garland was defending Trump (the office) because, I guess he believed that defaming someone was an official duty of the president.

Garland later dropped his defense.

slightlv

(7,789 posts)
4. I thought this was already adjudicated
Mon Oct 23, 2023, 09:17 PM
Oct 2023

before the case went to trial. Or, I guess, maybe that's another case I'm thinking of? He's crimed so much, it's hard to keep track of what's what and where.

BTW... how can you plead presidential immunity when you commited the crime prior to becoming president?! And since when has raped fallen under the "official duties" of the president? ARGH!

*rump is just throwing stuff out there to delay the courts, and see if anything sticks to a wall someplace. Grow up and take your medicine like a man!

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
6. I thought this had already been resolved...since Trump made additional comments after leaving office.
Mon Oct 23, 2023, 09:57 PM
Oct 2023

gab13by13

(32,317 posts)
9. The first case was never resolved,
Mon Oct 23, 2023, 10:11 PM
Oct 2023

because the issue of Trump claiming he had immunity because he was president was not resolved.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
10. I recall Carroll amending the complaint in the first suit after the second was adjudicated....
Mon Oct 23, 2023, 10:14 PM
Oct 2023

...to reflect further Trump comments after his term.

onenote

(46,139 posts)
7. The appeal is being heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, not the First Circuit
Mon Oct 23, 2023, 10:07 PM
Oct 2023

Pretty basic fact for the author of the article to get wrong.

The three judges hearing the case are a Biden appointee, an Obama appointee, and a Clinton appointee.

onenote

(46,139 posts)
13. It would be unusual to dismiss an appeal without briefing and oral argument
Mon Oct 23, 2023, 11:29 PM
Oct 2023

This appeal has been briefed and now has been argued. The judges will now weigh the arguments and issue a decision. It often takes months from the oral argument until the decision is issued in many circuits, but the second circuit generally is pretty quick.

ificandream

(11,837 posts)
15. The judges should throw this argument out on its ear
Mon Oct 23, 2023, 11:49 PM
Oct 2023

The rape of E. Jean Carroll happened years before he became president. What it appears he's trying to do is to extend presidential immunity to his entire life. I doubt Aileen Cannon would even fall for that (though I wouldn't want to bet on it).

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court will decide if Trum...