Scholastic will drop policy that makes it easier for school fairs to exclude diverse books
Source: Associated Press
NEW YORK (AP) Scholastic Inc. will end a widely criticized policy that made it easier for school book fairs not to sell works with racial, disability and LGBTQ+ themes.
The childrens publisher angered many authors and educators this fall when it created a separate package of dozens of books, labeled Share Every Story, Celebrate Every Voice, and gave schools the option on whether to include them in fairs. Poet Amanda Gorman, whose Change Sings was among the titles in Share Every Story, had said in an Instagram video that Scholastics decision felt like a betrayal.
Scholastic had said the policy, which will remain in place for the rest of the year, was a response to the proliferation of restrictions passed by states around the country. The publisher has not settled on a strategy for 2024.
This fall, we made changes in our U.S. elementary school fairs out of concern for our Book Fair hosts. In doing this, we offered a collection of books to supplement the diverse collection of titles already available at the Scholastic Book Fair. We understand now that the separate nature of the collection has caused confusion and feelings of exclusion, according to a Scholastic statement issued Wednesday.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/scholastic-school-book-fairs-diverse-956ab6ac29aa361d3b515acee0eac501
CrispyQ
(40,969 posts)Glad they reversed their decision but what were they thinking? We have to stand up to the zealots or they'll never stop. The list of books will get longer & longer till the Bible is the only book allowed, but only for men cuz women shouldn't be taught to read.
lostnfound
(17,520 posts)I loved the book order thing when I was young (1.2 million years ago) but I think theyve been giving wretched choices for awhile. When kid was that age I noticed a huge portion of the books were dystopian, fear-inducing, or twisted I dont think the selection process is healthy or normal to begin with.
keroro gunsou
(2,305 posts)A small step in the right direction. Im sick and tired of fundamentalist assholes ruining things with their mewling cries that they just trying to protect the children.
As a grown kid that read (and still does) read just about anything I can get my hands on, I take book banning pretty personally. My mom tried that crap with me, didnt work. And she wondered how and why I was testing far above my grade level in reading, English, and comprehension
those danged banned books I tell you whut.
Do they still that sort of testing anymore? Or is it just that race to the bottom, get the filthy federal lucre so we can pay our administration more rather than spend it on kids type of testing?
prodigitalson
(3,193 posts)Lithos
(26,638 posts)Even when we had kids there. We would instead give our kids the chance to buy from independent book sellers whose curation of books was a bit more realistic. Yes, the mainstream was there, but also gave them a chance to see the books which were being culled by RW extremist groups because they touched some sensitive nerve. The quality of the books they were exposed to had a much higher standard and their curiosity grew.
TL;DR - Avoided Scholastic - went to the Indy book stores to give my kids a chance to see a more diverse set of ideas and stories. Life is good - they were exposed to better authors and to more diverse ideas. More reading, more diversity - a win-win in my book.
dembotoz
(16,922 posts)as a book company wanting to sell as much product as possible i can understand the why. I would also worry about a bunch of clowns like praeger u coming in with their idea of acceptable books.... Being in sales...i get that...and i sure as hell would not want to be the sales director in a state where schools suddenly dropped your product.....quotas are quotas after all
but it was wrong