Court cites clergy-penitent privilege in dismissing child sex abuse lawsuit against Mormon church
Source: KVOA (Tucson TV)
An Arizona judge has dismissed a high-profile child sexual abuse lawsuit against The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, ruling that church officials who knew that a church member was sexually abusing his daughter had no duty to report the abuse to police or social service agencies because the information was received during a spiritual confession.
In a ruling on Friday, Cochise County Superior Court Judge Timothy Dickerson said the states clergy-penitent privilege excused two bishops and several other officials with the church, widely known as the Mormon church, from the states child sex abuse mandatory reporting law because Paul Adams initially disclosed during a confession that he was sexually abusing his daughter.
Church defendants were not required under the Mandatory Reporting Statute to report the abuse of Jane Doe 1 by her father because their knowledge of the abuse came from confidential communications which fall within the clergy-penitent exception, Dickerson wrote in his decision.
Although the church excommunicated Adams, its decision to withhold his abusive behavior from civil authorities allowed him to continue abusing his daughter for seven years, during which he began abusing a second daughter, starting when she was just 6 weeks old.
Read more: https://www.kvoa.com/news/local/court-cites-clergy-penitent-privilege-in-dismissing-child-sex-abuse-lawsuit-against-mormon-church/article_ad453c5e-12da-5f04-a23e-9695ae829084.html
pansypoo53219
(23,034 posts)niyad
(132,440 posts)MLAA
(19,745 posts)keopeli
(3,582 posts)Escurumbele
(4,094 posts)opens her lawsuit against the SOB once again, I hope that once trump is found guilty of more crimes that all the women he abused come forward and sue the SOB.
RockRaven
(19,373 posts)a broad brush... I guess I'm about to commit that sin here.
Anyone who is part of that church is complicit in this abuse because it was enabled by the church's policies and its people choosing to keep vile secrets while children were violated in the most abhorrent way. For years.
stopdiggin
(15,463 posts)religious practice and belief - or you don't. (or conversely, don't see it as valid or applicable)
But the court's ruling absolutely follows in the precepts of that tradition and belief. (and presumably state law backing such?)
(atheist here by the way)
Then the law clearly needs to be changed! Religious belief should never excuse child abuse!
cstanleytech
(28,471 posts)orleans
(36,918 posts)SIX WEEK OLD BABY?
YES!
cstanleytech
(28,471 posts)someone is accused of commiting such a crime as the attorney according to you would be required to report it.
orleans
(36,918 posts)and this makes me wonder how often, when someone is charged for sexually abusing a child, do they actually confess/admit this crime to their attorney.
cstanleytech
(28,471 posts)in a criminal case or civil one regarding divorce.
Either way it would be privileged information among the client and the attorney which is what you are advocating doing away with.
BWdem4life
(3,003 posts)stopdiggin
(15,463 posts)while clearly making no 'endorsement' of either. I don't understand the offense.
Although child welfare advocates in some states have backed legislation to eliminate the privilege, lobbying by the Catholic Church, the Mormon church, and the Jehovahs Witnesses has successfully persuaded lawmakers to maintain the exemption.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)We are all granted freedom of religion (or freedom from religion) with this caveat: one does not get to break secular law by claiming their religion endorses illegal behavior.
Or, it used to be that way for most of my life. Theres been a steady erosion of the separation of church and state over the past 20 or 30 years
The father in this particular case went right on molesting his little girl for another 7 years, and started sexually abusing her baby sister at 6 weeks. The Mormon church got off the hook by excommunicating him but imo youre either a mandatory reporter or youre not.
stopdiggin
(15,463 posts)the 'offense' I spoke to was for the response to my initial post.
And if you think I disagree in any fundamental way with what you have said above - that would be another misunderstanding. But I think your argument has to be with the religious institutions - and the laws and elected officials that are clearly intent on shielding them. My own part in all of this is only to call a spade a spade.
(and I walked away from all the posturing and pretense, somewhere shy of a 15th birthday .. )
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Really
Duppers
(28,469 posts)24601
(4,142 posts)did sell pot to his roommate, the attorney can just report everything to the prosecutors and testify against his client. The resulting guilty plea will save a lot of money that otherwise would be spent on ensuring a fair trial.
angrychair
(12,284 posts)This is completely fucking insane.
These people knowingly let that person molest a child and did nothing and the courts are like "oh well, nothing to see here"
Seriously, what fucking world am I living in.
3Hotdogs
(15,368 posts)Phoenix61
(18,828 posts)ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)I can't imagine being so full of rage, hate and cruelty to torture someone for five minutes, never mind forever. It takes real evil to do it forever. Even Hitler and Ted Bundy weren't that evil.
ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)Cover for each other, whenever they think they can get away with it. When they can't, they take great delight in blaming not-christians for the bad behavior of their wrongdoers, one way or another. And if even that doesn't work, they'll trot out their typical and well-worn persecution fantasies.
cstanleytech
(28,471 posts)Bristlecone
(11,111 posts)It is more about the fundamentalist sect(s) of LDS, but it really is an indictment of the whole org.
Jon Krakauer author
not fooled
(6,680 posts)LDS extremely influential in AZ to this day.
I looked up this judge's bio but couldn't find any reference to religious affiliation. Wouldn't surprise me if he's either LDS or Catholic.
Oh, and from this article https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/court-cites-clergy-penitent-privilege-in-18478790.php]:
Mysterian
(6,484 posts)Let's see how that plays out.
This is why religion gets a bad name. This is utterly insane.
PufPuf23
(9,852 posts)Would solve lots of chronic sexual and other abuse problems,
cstanleytech
(28,471 posts)Its kinda like the gun problem where if we want to really change things we need to amend that and make it more clear.
ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)Have squirmed free of sexual abuse allegations.
The first happened more than three years ago:
https://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/news/crime/2020/03/02/mormon-church-seeks-dismissal-lawsuit-over-reporting-sexual-abuse/4881888002/
You can bet that courts wouldn't give non-christians the same get-out-of-trouble card.
But, yeah, we're the immoral ones, because only "real" christians are moral. Just ask all the people who claim that criminal christians are actual "fake" christians, ergo, not christians.
Farmer-Rick
(12,667 posts)A little girl was sexually abused for 7 extra years.
A 6 week old baby was sexually abused and it continued for years.
How can these people who call themselves Christian let that happen? And then the court turns around and blessed it.
All I can say is I am glad I'm an atheist. I know, I wouldn't have let those babies be sex toys for a grown man. I know that would be wrong. As an atheist I know it would be immoral to do nothing.
Why couldn't one of them just anonymously reported the abuser? Why couldn't one of them done the merest thing to call in an anonymous tip?
And the courts said Mormons and Christians can continue to ignore child and baby sexual abuse. It's A OK with the law. Ignore all the horrors your religion creates because it's legal. There is some seriously bad law.
bringthePaine
(1,806 posts)sarisataka
(22,695 posts)To be forgiven for such a sin would include surrendering oneself to the authorities. Spiritual forgiveness does not absolve one from temporal consequences.
Freethinker65
(11,203 posts)However, if the confession was about an ongoing crime it should be reported to LE.
melm00se
(5,161 posts)that discusses clergy as mandatory reporters.
https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/clergymandated.pdf
For laws to be changed:
This is not as simple as just saying "change the laws". In the US, the legal basis for the priest-penitent privilege is in the 1st Amendment.
The argument goes thusly:
- Religious belief says that this privacy of this relationship is absolute.
- Legislation to bypass this is passed.
- Lawsuit is filed referencing the 1st Amendment text: "Congress shall make no law...prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
- Court looks at this and says "Nope. Legislation cannot alter a religious belief".
Any ruling to the contrary sets the precedent that Congress can alter a religion and its beliefs. This can then be taken further to limit: speech, affiliation, press and assembly.
I would like to point out that historically messing with a person's religion is a very dangerous and foolish action.
When people start messing around with fundamental rights because of a micro-event, the macro big picture and the worst case implications of the change must be considered (actually assumed the worst case will come to fruition).
cstanleytech
(28,471 posts)Though I personally think the way around that would be to pass legislation requiring states to form and operate a well run militia along with details over what qualifies as well run.
melm00se
(5,161 posts)priest-penitent immunity fates back much farther than the Court's current opinion on the 2nd Amendment so the 2 are not anywhere near comparable.
sakabatou
(46,148 posts)ificandream
(11,837 posts)According to Google, priests are forbidden to disclose any crimes they hear. They can only tell the penitent to go to authorities and reveal the crime.
republianmushroom
(22,325 posts)Vinca
(53,994 posts)The Roux Comes First
(2,278 posts)Now we have some sort of church custodian-pedophile exemption for child abuse reporting? My impression is that the rules are pretty damn strict for anyone working in educational institutions in particular when it comes to reporting ANY evidence of child abuse. Why is this not the case when a donation plate or fanciful spiritual claims come into the picture?
Where does this originate?
pfitz59
(12,704 posts)So how can a penitent rule apply? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priesthood_(LDS_Church)
grandpamike1
(218 posts)Bullshit.