Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ificandream

(11,851 posts)
Thu Nov 16, 2023, 11:27 AM Nov 2023

House Ethics Committee releases scathing report on George Santos

Last edited Thu Nov 16, 2023, 02:12 PM - Edit history (2)

Source: The Hill

11/16/23 10:05 AM ET

The House Ethics Committee in a report released Thursday said there is clear evidence that Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) committed serious crimes, though it stopped short of recommending formal sanctions, as some had hoped it would do.

The panel referred its findings of "potential violations of federal criminal law" to the Department of Justice, and its report will raise questions about whether the House will expel Santos, who has been a subject of controversy since before he formally became a member of Congress -- and has publicly admitted to fabricating aspects of his backstory and resume.

"[T]he evidence uncovered by the Investigative Subcommittee (ISC) revealed that Representative George Santos cannot be trusted," the report reads. "At nearly every opportunity, he placed his desire for private gain above his duty to uphold the Constitution, federal law, and ethical principles."

The report found that Santos "blatantly stole from his campaign" and "deceived donors into providing what they thought were contributions to his campaign but were in fact payments for his personal benefit."

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4312814-house-ethics-committee-releases-scathing-report-into-george-santos/



Link to House report: https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/16/politics/read-santos-ethics-report/index.html

(Second version)

The House Ethics Committee in a report released Thursday said there is clear evidence that Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) committed serious crimes, though it stopped short of recommending formal sanctions, as some had hoped it would do.

The panel referred its findings of "potential violations of federal criminal law" to the Department of Justice, and its report will raise questions about whether the House will expel Santos, who has been a subject of controversy since before he formally became a member of Congress.

"[T]he evidence uncovered by the Investigative Subcommittee (ISC) revealed that Representative George Santos cannot be trusted," the report reads. "At nearly every opportunity, he placed his desire for private gain above his duty to uphold the Constitution, federal law, and ethical principles."

While the committee did not make a formal recommendation on expulsion, as Chair Michael Guest (R-Miss.) told previously reporters would be the case, the top lawmakers on the panel said "Santos' conduct warrants public condemnation, is beneath the dignity of the office, and has brought severe discredit to the House."

First version:

The House Ethics Committee released its highly anticipated report on Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) on Thursday, referring its findings of "potential violations of federal criminal law" to the Department of Justice.

In a statement accompanying the report, the chairman and ranking member of the panel said there is "substantial evidence" to show that Santos "knowingly caused his campaign committee to file false or incomplete reports with the Federal Election Commission; used campaign funds for personal purposes; engaged in fraudulent conduct in connection with RedStone Strategies LLC; and engaged in knowing and willful violations of the Ethics in Government Act as it relates to his Financial Disclosure (FD) Statements filed with the House."

The final product is sure to exacerbate the controversy surrounding Santos, who is facing 23 federal criminal counts and has already endured two expulsion efforts -- with a third likely on the horizon.



13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House Ethics Committee releases scathing report on George Santos (Original Post) ificandream Nov 2023 OP
Hmmm.... Possible VP pick for tRump? 70sEraVet Nov 2023 #1
Ha! PJMcK Nov 2023 #11
Well well well! Now we'll see if the new Speaker has the balls to remove him. I'll say no and he'll.... machoneman Nov 2023 #2
Harsh words only. After all, he ain't no Hunter Biden. keithbvadu2 Nov 2023 #3
Let's talk about the ethics of the ENTIRE Republican Party while we're at it FakeNoose Nov 2023 #4
But no mention of asking him to resign? Freethinker65 Nov 2023 #5
STOP LAUGHING AT PRESIDENT SANTOS!! HE'S A WAR HERO!!! AZ8theist Nov 2023 #6
Will not sanction this criminal clown Bayard Nov 2023 #7
Amen!! Duppers Nov 2023 #13
And it means "nothing". republianmushroom Nov 2023 #8
Referral to the DOJ is not acceptable and is not sufficient LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2023 #9
Committee on Ethics U. S. House Committee Members riversedge Nov 2023 #10
They didn't bother subpoenaing Santos, because he'd only lie to them muriel_volestrangler Nov 2023 #12

PJMcK

(25,126 posts)
11. Ha!
Thu Nov 16, 2023, 01:29 PM
Nov 2023

Good one.

If Trump ends up the GOP nominee, which I doubt, I think he'll pick a woman like Kari Lake or MTG.

machoneman

(4,128 posts)
2. Well well well! Now we'll see if the new Speaker has the balls to remove him. I'll say no and he'll....
Thu Nov 16, 2023, 11:39 AM
Nov 2023

...say let's wait until he's tried, found guilty and executed....oh, I mean jailed!

FakeNoose

(42,409 posts)
4. Let's talk about the ethics of the ENTIRE Republican Party while we're at it
Thu Nov 16, 2023, 12:08 PM
Nov 2023

Who accepted the credentials of George Santos in the first place? Who vetted him? Who allowed him to continue as a U.S. Representative even after it became obvious to everyone that he was unqualified and probably tainted? Who voted not to sanction or remove him from the House?

Yes the person who calls himself "George Santos" is definitely a chaos agent of the highest order. But I'm looking at a lot of failures here, not just one.

LetMyPeopleVote

(182,047 posts)
9. Referral to the DOJ is not acceptable and is not sufficient
Thu Nov 16, 2023, 01:22 PM
Nov 2023

Santos should be expelled. Santos is already under indictment and additional charges are somewhat meaningless. Santos not running is also meaningless in that there is no way that Santos could win a GOP primary


riversedge

(81,541 posts)
10. Committee on Ethics U. S. House Committee Members
Thu Nov 16, 2023, 01:23 PM
Nov 2023


Committee on Ethics U. S. House

https://ethics.house.gov/about/committee-members


Committee Members



Republicans


Chairman Michael Guest, Mississippi

David P. Joyce, Ohio

John H. Rutherford, Florida

Andrew R. Garbarino, New York

Michelle Fischbach, Minnesota


Democrats

Ranking Member Susan Wild, Pennsylvania

Veronica Escobar, Texas

Mark DeSaulnier, California

Deborah K. Ross, North Carolina

Glenn F. Ivey, Maryland




About

Committee Members
Committee Staff
Committee Events
Committee Jurisdiction
Committee History
Committee Advice
Committee Rules
Committee Jobs
Committee Statements

Committee on Ethics

1015 Longworth House Office Building (LHOB), Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-7103 - Fax: 202-225-7392
Office Hours:
Mon. – Thurs – 9:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m.
Fri. – 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.

Email Update Signup

muriel_volestrangler

(106,599 posts)
12. They didn't bother subpoenaing Santos, because he'd only lie to them
Thu Nov 16, 2023, 01:53 PM
Nov 2023
Ethics investigators said they opted not to subpoena Santos, determining that doing so could have delayed their probe and that Santos' testimony would have "low evidentiary value given his admitted practice of embellishment.”

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/substantial-evidence-rep-george-santos-broke-law-ethics-panel-finds-rcna125335

Sounds right.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Ethics Committee re...