Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,736 posts)
Sat Dec 23, 2023, 06:14 AM Dec 2023

Twitter violated contract by failing to pay millions in bonuses, US judge rules

Source: Reuters

December 22, 2023 10:41 PM EST


WASHINGTON, Dec 22 (Reuters) - Twitter violated contracts by failing to pay millions of dollars in bonuses that the social media company, now called X Corp, had promised its employees, a federal judge ruled on Friday.

Mark Schobinger, who was Twitter's senior director of compensation before leaving Elon Musk's company in May, sued Twitter in June, claiming breach of contract. Schobinger's suit alleged that before and after billionaire Musk bought Twitter last year, it promised employees 50% of their 2022 target bonuses but never made those payments.

In denying Twitter's motion to dismiss the case, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria ruled that Schobinger plausibly stated a breach of contract claim under California law and he was covered by a bonus plan. "Once Schobinger did what Twitter asked, Twitter's offer to pay him a bonus in return became a binding contract under California law. And by allegedly refusing to pay Schobinger his promised bonus, Twitter violated that contract," the judge wrote.

X no longer has a media relations office. The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment to its X account outside business hours.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/legal/twitter-violated-contract-by-failing-pay-millions-bonuses-us-judge-rules-2023-12-23/

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Twitter violated contract by failing to pay millions in bonuses, US judge rules (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Dec 2023 OP
Transparency, Nazi-Style Roy Rolling Dec 2023 #1
Millions is nothing to Musk, live love laugh Dec 2023 #2
Youre right, of course. But the wealthiest people always seem .... 70sEraVet Dec 2023 #7
true SouthernDem4ever Dec 2023 #9
It's how they got wealthy. n/t Mr.Bill Dec 2023 #15
And that makes his failing to pay pomised bonuses to his employees all the more egregious. ShazzieB Dec 2023 #19
emo strikes again samnsara Dec 2023 #3
NumbNutz has everything running on auto-pilot bucolic_frolic Dec 2023 #4
Libertarians claim that we only need contract law Voltaire2 Dec 2023 #5
Ah, libertarianism American-style lonely bird Dec 2023 #14
Merry Xmas moniss Dec 2023 #6
Being a bad Nazi, again! Zambero Dec 2023 #8
Dead is good. Historic NY Dec 2023 #11
There have never been "good" Nazis, but there have been many competent and effective ones. ShazzieB Dec 2023 #20
Scrooge in charge is going to enroll them in the jelly of the month club. Sheesh Historic NY Dec 2023 #10
What is it about these billionaires not paying the obligations ? republianmushroom Dec 2023 #12
How do you think they became billionaires? keopeli Dec 2023 #13
Destroy X LiberalFighter Dec 2023 #16
Musk does not believe in honoring contracts LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #17
Of course not. ShazzieB Dec 2023 #21
Elon needs to GO BACK TO HIS COUNTRY Obvious85 Dec 2023 #18
"The lawsuits make a range of claims, including that X discriminated against older employees, women and workers with dis riversedge Dec 2023 #22
Taylor Swift gave her touring crew a total 55 million in bonus. n/t spike jones Dec 2023 #23
Crappy reporting. Ms. Toad Dec 2023 #24

Roy Rolling

(7,632 posts)
1. Transparency, Nazi-Style
Sat Dec 23, 2023, 07:07 AM
Dec 2023

X no longer has a media relations office. The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment

Lecture me some more, Elmo, about how to not restrict information from the public citizen or customer. Elmo doesn’t know how to do transparency right.

70sEraVet

(5,482 posts)
7. Youre right, of course. But the wealthiest people always seem ....
Sat Dec 23, 2023, 09:34 AM
Dec 2023

ready to screw over other people over even tiny amounts of money. Its in their nature.

ShazzieB

(22,582 posts)
19. And that makes his failing to pay pomised bonuses to his employees all the more egregious.
Sat Dec 23, 2023, 04:29 PM
Dec 2023

It's not like he couldn't afford it!

bucolic_frolic

(55,129 posts)
4. NumbNutz has everything running on auto-pilot
Sat Dec 23, 2023, 08:15 AM
Dec 2023

Mechanical money dripping hierarchies to make Elmo RICH!

Voltaire2

(15,377 posts)
5. Libertarians claim that we only need contract law
Sat Dec 23, 2023, 08:45 AM
Dec 2023

to ‘regulate’ economic activity, and then proceed to ignore contracts and use their wealth to obstruct that legal process.

ShazzieB

(22,582 posts)
20. There have never been "good" Nazis, but there have been many competent and effective ones.
Sat Dec 23, 2023, 04:43 PM
Dec 2023

Eloon's not just evil. He's so incompetent that he can't even be evil effectively!

riversedge

(80,808 posts)
22. "The lawsuits make a range of claims, including that X discriminated against older employees, women and workers with dis
Sat Dec 23, 2023, 06:37 PM
Dec 2023



..........X has been hit with numerous lawsuits by former employees and executives since Musk bought the company and culled more than half of its workforce.

The lawsuits make a range of claims, including that X discriminated against older employees, women and workers with disabilities, and failed to give advance notice of mass layoffs. The company denies wrongdoing.


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/twitter-violated-contract-pay-millions-bonuses-us-judge-rules-rcna131034?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma&taid=6587434e4a445e0001592f9a&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

Ms. Toad

(38,635 posts)
24. Crappy reporting.
Sat Dec 23, 2023, 07:36 PM
Dec 2023

If the later part of the article is correct, what the judge ruled was that Schobinger gets a chance to prove his case in a full trial (the case survived a motion to end the trial early because the claims were too flimsy) - not that he had already proven it.

It is a step toward proving it - but Schobinger still has to make his case before it is over.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Twitter violated contract...