Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
Tue Jan 9, 2024, 01:27 AM Jan 2024

Alaska Airlines plane had warnings days before mid-air blowout

Source: BBC

Alaska Airlines placed restrictions on the Boeing plane involved in a dramatic mid-air blowout after pressurisation warnings in the days before Friday's incident, investigators say.

The jet had been prevented from making long-haul flights over water, said Jennifer Homendy of the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).

…snip…

Before Saturday's intervention by the FAA, Alaska Airlines briefly returned some of its Max 9s to service, saying it had made "no concerning findings".

Speaking at a news conference, Ms Homendy said pilots reported pressurisation warning lights on three previous flights made by the specific Alaska Airlines Max 9 involved in the incident.

Read more: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67909417.amp



Lawsuits aplenty coming up.
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alaska Airlines plane had warnings days before mid-air blowout (Original Post) brooklynite Jan 2024 OP
Lawsuits for what? There were no significant injuries. Ocelot II Jan 2024 #1
It's America. They'll sue for trauma, lost phones, time lost. maxsolomon Jan 2024 #5
Tell that to this woman and others traumatized by the event Wonder Why Jan 2024 #7
That's possible, depending on the severity. See this case: Ocelot II Jan 2024 #8
Only if someone suffered more than a bloody nose. cstanleytech Jan 2024 #2
Many of you don't know Boeing's engineer told them 737 was not safe so what did they do? Stargazer99 Jan 2024 #3
Alaska Airlines might have a claim; they were sold a defective airplane. Ocelot II Jan 2024 #6
"Boeing's engineer" EX500rider Jan 2024 #9
It was one working on the 737 that they took off the project when he told them it was not safe Stargazer99 Jan 2024 #10
And yet over 1,200 737-Max's have been delivered with 7,000 ordered EX500rider Jan 2024 #11
It killed 400 people initally-I live in the NW so I heard about this before many of you Stargazer99 Jan 2024 #12
Yes it did and the software was fixed EX500rider Jan 2024 #13
I am sure the software fix didn't comfort the relatives of the dead passengers or do they count? Stargazer99 Jan 2024 #15
Not the first plane to have flaws that cause crashes EX500rider Jan 2024 #16
Maybe paying attention to your engineers might have prevented 400 deaths Stargazer99 Jan 2024 #17
Unless he was specifically objecting to the MCAS it wasn't saving anybody EX500rider Jan 2024 #18
There were specific warnings about MCAS.. Boeing's exemplary culture shifted lostnfound Jan 2024 #19
And nobody sitting in the most dangerous seats...what a miracle Prairie Gates Jan 2024 #4
Well gee, at least they didn't let the planes go over water. Makes it easier to find the phones, tshirts and bodies. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2024 #14
Only good thing from this story is that no one died. Swede Jan 2024 #20

maxsolomon

(38,727 posts)
5. It's America. They'll sue for trauma, lost phones, time lost.
Tue Jan 9, 2024, 02:25 PM
Jan 2024

Kid will sue for losing his shirt.

Stargazer99

(3,517 posts)
3. Many of you don't know Boeing's engineer told them 737 was not safe so what did they do?
Tue Jan 9, 2024, 11:07 AM
Jan 2024

took the engineer off the project and proceeded...they need to be sued

Stargazer99

(3,517 posts)
10. It was one working on the 737 that they took off the project when he told them it was not safe
Tue Jan 9, 2024, 03:34 PM
Jan 2024

and he was right!

EX500rider

(12,583 posts)
11. And yet over 1,200 737-Max's have been delivered with 7,000 ordered
Tue Jan 9, 2024, 03:42 PM
Jan 2024

They don't seem to be falling out of the sky.

Boeing's 737 Max has been described as "the most scrutinized transport aircraft in history"

EX500rider

(12,583 posts)
13. Yes it did and the software was fixed
Tue Jan 9, 2024, 03:59 PM
Jan 2024

And aviation news travels worldwide, not just to the NW

Stargazer99

(3,517 posts)
15. I am sure the software fix didn't comfort the relatives of the dead passengers or do they count?
Wed Jan 10, 2024, 09:41 AM
Jan 2024

EX500rider

(12,583 posts)
16. Not the first plane to have flaws that cause crashes
Wed Jan 10, 2024, 10:43 AM
Jan 2024

See the Airbus in Air France's flight 447 for example.

Stargazer99

(3,517 posts)
17. Maybe paying attention to your engineers might have prevented 400 deaths
Wed Jan 10, 2024, 03:27 PM
Jan 2024

The problem with business seems to be what little value they place on human life...taking time and expense to investigate why the engineer said it wasn't safe might have saved human lives.

lostnfound

(17,520 posts)
19. There were specific warnings about MCAS.. Boeing's exemplary culture shifted
Thu Jan 11, 2024, 06:24 AM
Jan 2024

In the mid-2000s. Before that, Phil Condit was president an CEO and he was a Boeing-grown aerodynamics engineer who got his pilot license at age 18. The engineering-led culture was stellar. I used to walk through their factory and think “this is a national pride”.

A couple years of Harry Stonecipher from Douglas, who irritated Boeing people, then the GE guys took over. McNerney and Calhoun are smart guys but came from business / finance orientation and their aviation experience is in engines, not aircraft design / manufacturing. Muilenburg had aerospace background but from Boeing military side, much different focus and culture. Boeing people had their doubts about all of these cultural shifts — I heard them regularly. Even from those selling airplanes.

Today’s chairman is an honest, great person — he has integrity and is brilliant. But to rebuild the old safety culture may be difficult. In my opinion, they should be elevating the geeky airplane engineers from within more than they have been.

As far as MCAS..

”Are we vulnerable to single AOA sensor failures with the MCAS implementation or is there some checking that occurs?” - December 2015 memo.

”Frankly right now all my internal warning bells are going off,” said the email. “And for the first time in my life, I’m sorry to say that I’m hesitant about putting my family on a Boeing airplane.”…

A separate Boeing document about MCAS from June 2018, four months before Lion Air Flight 610 crashed in Indonesia, warned that slow reaction times to runaway trim, which can push the nose of the plane down, could be “catastrophic” if pilots take more than 10 seconds to react and said it found a typical reaction time was four seconds.
https://www.aviationtoday.com/2019/11/02/boeing-ceo-outlines-mcas-updates-congressional-hearings/

Hassin Bin Sober

(27,461 posts)
14. Well gee, at least they didn't let the planes go over water. Makes it easier to find the phones, tshirts and bodies.
Tue Jan 9, 2024, 04:48 PM
Jan 2024

They could advertise them as fresh air flights.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Alaska Airlines plane had...