Alaska Airlines plane had warnings days before mid-air blowout
Source: BBC
Alaska Airlines placed restrictions on the Boeing plane involved in a dramatic mid-air blowout after pressurisation warnings in the days before Friday's incident, investigators say.
The jet had been prevented from making long-haul flights over water, said Jennifer Homendy of the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).
snip
Before Saturday's intervention by the FAA, Alaska Airlines briefly returned some of its Max 9s to service, saying it had made "no concerning findings".
Speaking at a news conference, Ms Homendy said pilots reported pressurisation warning lights on three previous flights made by the specific Alaska Airlines Max 9 involved in the incident.
Read more: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67909417.amp
Lawsuits aplenty coming up.
Ocelot II
(130,533 posts)Although there might be a few cases like this one: https://casetext.com/case/quill-v-trans-world-airlines-inc
maxsolomon
(38,727 posts)Kid will sue for losing his shirt.
Wonder Why
(7,025 posts)I'm sure you would not get PTSD from something like this.
Ocelot II
(130,533 posts)cstanleytech
(28,471 posts)Stargazer99
(3,517 posts)took the engineer off the project and proceeded...they need to be sued
Ocelot II
(130,533 posts)EX500rider
(12,583 posts)They have 17,000 engineers.
Stargazer99
(3,517 posts)and he was right!
EX500rider
(12,583 posts)They don't seem to be falling out of the sky.
Boeing's 737 Max has been described as "the most scrutinized transport aircraft in history"
Stargazer99
(3,517 posts)EX500rider
(12,583 posts)And aviation news travels worldwide, not just to the NW
Stargazer99
(3,517 posts)EX500rider
(12,583 posts)See the Airbus in Air France's flight 447 for example.
Stargazer99
(3,517 posts)The problem with business seems to be what little value they place on human life...taking time and expense to investigate why the engineer said it wasn't safe might have saved human lives.
EX500rider
(12,583 posts)lostnfound
(17,520 posts)In the mid-2000s. Before that, Phil Condit was president an CEO and he was a Boeing-grown aerodynamics engineer who got his pilot license at age 18. The engineering-led culture was stellar. I used to walk through their factory and think this is a national pride.
A couple years of Harry Stonecipher from Douglas, who irritated Boeing people, then the GE guys took over. McNerney and Calhoun are smart guys but came from business / finance orientation and their aviation experience is in engines, not aircraft design / manufacturing. Muilenburg had aerospace background but from Boeing military side, much different focus and culture. Boeing people had their doubts about all of these cultural shifts I heard them regularly. Even from those selling airplanes.
Todays chairman is an honest, great person he has integrity and is brilliant. But to rebuild the old safety culture may be difficult. In my opinion, they should be elevating the geeky airplane engineers from within more than they have been.
As far as MCAS..
A separate Boeing document about MCAS from June 2018, four months before Lion Air Flight 610 crashed in Indonesia, warned that slow reaction times to runaway trim, which can push the nose of the plane down, could be catastrophic if pilots take more than 10 seconds to react and said it found a typical reaction time was four seconds.
https://www.aviationtoday.com/2019/11/02/boeing-ceo-outlines-mcas-updates-congressional-hearings/
Prairie Gates
(8,156 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(27,461 posts)They could advertise them as fresh air flights.
Swede
(39,492 posts)nt