Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(167,106 posts)
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 05:11 AM Feb 2024

Alabama Supreme Court Rules That Frozen Embryos Are 'Children'

Source: Huff Post

Feb 18, 2024, 11:01 PM EST


The Alabama Supreme Court ruled Friday that frozen embryos are children, which pro-choice rights groups have warned could have dangerous implications for fertility treatments such as in vitro fertilization.

The Alabama Supreme Court on Friday reversed Mobile County Circuit Court Judge Jill Parrish Phillips’ decision to dismiss a lawsuit in which a couple sued an Alabama fertility clinic and hospital for the “wrongful death” of their frozen embryos in a ruling that was riddled with theology. The couple’s frozen embryos were destroyed after a hospital patient who accessed the freezer that held the embryos dropped them on the floor. The ruling means that the couple can sue for wrongful death.

“[T]he Wrongful Death of a Minor Act is sweeping and unqualified. It applies to all children, born and unborn, without limitation,” the ruling said. “It is not the role of this Court to craft a new limitation based on our own view of what is or is not wise public policy. That is especially true where, as here, the People of this State have adopted a Constitutional amendment directly aimed at stopping courts from excluding ‘unborn life’ from legal protection.”

The ruling pointed to the Alabama Constitution Section 36.06, which argues that each person was made in God’s image, meaning each life has an incalculable value that “cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God.”

Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/alabama-ruling-frozen-embryos-children_n_65d29a77e4b043f1c0aba2b9?nmq

52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alabama Supreme Court Rules That Frozen Embryos Are 'Children' (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Feb 2024 OP
So, then by the "logic" of the AL Supreme Court, if a freezer holding frozen embryos no_hypocrisy Feb 2024 #1
That's a big ramification of this. BumRushDaShow Feb 2024 #2
The entire Gulf Coast is clusterfuck sponsored by the Republican clowns of the apocalypse. Magoo48 Feb 2024 #34
Just fly into Disney, give them your money, then GTFO wolfie001 Feb 2024 #36
Should spawn an embryo tax-deduction Trust Fund, IRA, Social Security, Stim Check scheme bucolic_frolic Feb 2024 #3
Deductions for college savings accounts - perhaps the state will kick in some matching funds EYESORE 9001 Feb 2024 #4
Every "child/embryo" should count in the census for the state they are located BumRushDaShow Feb 2024 #5
"But officer, I'm not violating the carpool lane laws. MurrayDelph Feb 2024 #43
"Hey, Honey? Let's freeze some tax deductions." vanlassie Feb 2024 #6
No shit. progressoid Feb 2024 #9
If they were alive, freezing them would be child abuse. raging moderate Feb 2024 #13
so if they place that keeps them frozen loses power and the embryos are not longer viable... Javaman Feb 2024 #7
Not so much murder EmmaLee E Feb 2024 #39
I'm ready to get flak for this... Trueblue Texan Feb 2024 #8
I've got 2 1st cousins that used in vitro fertilization. maxsolomon Feb 2024 #20
belief in illogical things can be a virtue in Catholicism DBoon Feb 2024 #27
Next up from AL, women accused of 'wrongful death' in every period cycle. apnu Feb 2024 #10
And The State Hasn't Earned The Nickname... GB_RN Feb 2024 #31
Wouldn't that also be considered manslaughter? Squaredeal Feb 2024 #11
"After a divorce, does an ex-spouse have the right to the embryos and collect child support" BumRushDaShow Feb 2024 #12
God's image? What the fuckin' fuck is that? twodogsbarking Feb 2024 #14
Torah FORBIDS images of God. Grins Feb 2024 #19
Embryos are frozen until needed... CCExile Feb 2024 #15
freezers aren't built to last that long DBoon Feb 2024 #28
For the purpose of this discussion is the embryo and egg or a fertilized egg in the true biological sense? usaf-vet Feb 2024 #29
Small towns could now afford zoos of their own. Or have a traveling zoo in a box! Wonder Why Feb 2024 #32
So, will someone now be challenging AL's death penalty? area51 Feb 2024 #16
Hell naw! Rethuglicans only care about people BEFORE they're born. OMGWTF Feb 2024 #22
Yup! NowsTheTime Feb 2024 #41
Monty said it 50 yrs ago... k55f5r Feb 2024 #17
"...a hospital patient who...dropped them on the floor" Grins Feb 2024 #18
An accident. They thought it was where the staff kept the ice cream containers and they wanted some butter pecan. Wonder Why Feb 2024 #33
Really? You can't put a baby in the freezer. OMGWTF Feb 2024 #21
Tax deductions ! republianmushroom Feb 2024 #23
My thoughts as well. SergeStorms Feb 2024 #24
What about the millions of sperm spilled daily by each man in AL? I could go much further on "wasted" sperm. keopeli Feb 2024 #25
My thoughts exactly. I mean it is half a baby, right? Chainfire Feb 2024 #26
This is perfect for those white nationalists BaronChocula Feb 2024 #30
Elle Woods put it best in "Legally Blonde" LastLiberal in PalmSprings Feb 2024 #35
Could an embryo get a license to carry a gun Marthe48 Feb 2024 #37
So the buildings on fire, you can only save one. Live little baby lying in a crib or a box holding a hundred embryos. OverBurn Feb 2024 #38
I read the title incorrectly... Layzeebeaver Feb 2024 #40
Alabama Constitution Section 36.06, which argues that each person was made in God's image pfitz59 Feb 2024 #42
So based on that. Old Crank Feb 2024 #45
I checked and ... SomewhereInTheMiddle Feb 2024 #49
Yeah; the judge implied the "image of God" stuff from one use of "Almighty God" in the preamble muriel_volestrangler Feb 2024 #52
So when the companies in AL which do this shut down Old Crank Feb 2024 #44
Truly idiotic, stupid and moronic SouthernDem4ever Feb 2024 #46
now texas is arguing a fetus isn't a baby and doesn't have rights republianmushroom Feb 2024 #47
The reliance on types of Christianity in the ruling is worse than the Huff Post report says muriel_volestrangler Feb 2024 #48
Their Chief Justice: dalton99a Feb 2024 #50
Al Abama. Yoga was not allowed in public schools for 30 years. underpants Feb 2024 #51

no_hypocrisy

(54,559 posts)
1. So, then by the "logic" of the AL Supreme Court, if a freezer holding frozen embryos
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 05:38 AM
Feb 2024

goes on the fritz, that's mass murder, correct?

BumRushDaShow

(167,106 posts)
2. That's a big ramification of this.
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 05:47 AM
Feb 2024

There is a whole zealot wing of the christo-fascist far right who want to get rid of IVF (I expect instead favoring selective "rape", Gilead-style, for reproduction).

wolfie001

(7,358 posts)
36. Just fly into Disney, give them your money, then GTFO
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 04:23 PM
Feb 2024

The rest of the region can work on changing their voting patterns.

bucolic_frolic

(54,481 posts)
3. Should spawn an embryo tax-deduction Trust Fund, IRA, Social Security, Stim Check scheme
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 05:58 AM
Feb 2024

Heck, a billionaire could use 500 Embryo-Children in the Umbrella Financial Asvisory Fund, no?

EYESORE 9001

(29,522 posts)
4. Deductions for college savings accounts - perhaps the state will kick in some matching funds
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 06:18 AM
Feb 2024

I’m sure some tax accountant to the rich is working all the angles.

BumRushDaShow

(167,106 posts)
5. Every "child/embryo" should count in the census for the state they are located
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 06:47 AM
Feb 2024

and since red state loons don't want IVF, guess who gets the population?


raging moderate

(4,608 posts)
13. If they were alive, freezing them would be child abuse.
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 09:38 AM
Feb 2024

Last edited Fri Feb 23, 2024, 07:44 AM - Edit history (1)

The worker who flipped them out of the freezer would actually be their rescuer.

Javaman

(65,409 posts)
7. so if they place that keeps them frozen loses power and the embryos are not longer viable...
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 07:51 AM
Feb 2024

will the business or facility be charges with murder?

fucking repukes are nuts.

Trueblue Texan

(4,259 posts)
8. I'm ready to get flak for this...
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 07:52 AM
Feb 2024

...But HA! HA! HA! Serves abortion foes right! I said this was going to happen! A lot of anti-abortion folks are pissed that women end their pregnancies when they themselves can't carry a child! They are all for in vitro fertilization with little regard for the frozen embryos. Now they're gonna have to live with the legalized "reality" that they are responsible for untold number of abortions in the form of dead or abandoned frozen embryos. Serves. Them. Right.

But it's still f*cked up.

maxsolomon

(38,393 posts)
20. I've got 2 1st cousins that used in vitro fertilization.
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 11:47 AM
Feb 2024

Both are rabidly anti-choice Catholics.

When I learned how they'd conceived, I noted that they'd likely "pruned" some embryos, selecting over others, or left some frozen in the lab - effectively aborting them. I still don't know how they square that circle.

DBoon

(24,822 posts)
27. belief in illogical things can be a virtue in Catholicism
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 12:56 PM
Feb 2024

If you can believe in transubstantiation, you can believe IVF is OK despite church teachings to the contrary

apnu

(8,790 posts)
10. Next up from AL, women accused of 'wrongful death' in every period cycle.
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 08:14 AM
Feb 2024

Calling it now. There is no bottom for the American Taliban.

GB_RN

(3,531 posts)
31. And The State Hasn't Earned The Nickname...
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 01:58 PM
Feb 2024

Talibama for no reason.

No offense to those in the state who don’t hold to the Talibama doctrines…

Squaredeal

(711 posts)
11. Wouldn't that also be considered manslaughter?
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 08:23 AM
Feb 2024

A criminal charge, which the patient who dropped the embryos could face in state court.
What about someone who transports the embryos out of state if they’re not the parents? Is that a criminal Federal kidnapping offense?
After a divorce, does an ex-spouse have the right to the embryos and collect child support if one of them brings them to full term? Need some more money from your ex, just give birth to another embryo. You could even hire another female to carry it to birth. This could be a way to get back at an ex, who might have gone on with his or her life, by repeatedly have more of their embryos birthed long after the divorce.

usaf-vet

(7,768 posts)
29. For the purpose of this discussion is the embryo and egg or a fertilized egg in the true biological sense?
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 12:59 PM
Feb 2024

For example, you could capture and freeze an egg from any mammal (to simplify, excluding reptiles, amphibians, etc.).

Would that frozen egg, aka embryo, be a viable "baby"?

area51

(12,589 posts)
16. So, will someone now be challenging AL's death penalty?
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 10:26 AM
Feb 2024


“... which argues that each person was made in God’s image, meaning each life has an incalculable value that 'cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God.'”

OMGWTF

(5,043 posts)
22. Hell naw! Rethuglicans only care about people BEFORE they're born.
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 11:51 AM
Feb 2024

Once you're born it's a hearty "fuck you" especially if you're not part of the lucky sperm club.

Grins

(9,333 posts)
18. "...a hospital patient who...dropped them on the floor"
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 11:32 AM
Feb 2024

The state's argument is pure crackpottery. But who gives A PATIENT access to the freezer that held the embryos?

Wonder Why

(6,637 posts)
33. An accident. They thought it was where the staff kept the ice cream containers and they wanted some butter pecan.
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 02:20 PM
Feb 2024

SergeStorms

(20,200 posts)
24. My thoughts as well.
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 12:23 PM
Feb 2024

On a good afternoon I could rub out millions of tax deductions. Do I have to name each individual sperm? Get birth certificates for each?

They're opening up Pandora's box here.

BaronChocula

(4,180 posts)
30. This is perfect for those white nationalists
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 01:14 PM
Feb 2024

Embryos don't have developed genitals. Given Club Vitriol's yen for shunning the nonbinary, this gives them more "people" to hate on.

35. Elle Woods put it best in "Legally Blonde"
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 03:28 PM
Feb 2024

"For that matter, all masturbatory emissions, where his sperm was clearly not seeking an egg, could be termed reckless abandonment."

Marthe48

(22,855 posts)
37. Could an embryo get a license to carry a gun
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 05:12 PM
Feb 2024

And shoot someone on 5th Ave. and get away with it?
Could the embryo get a driver's license?
Vote?
So wish the maniacs would stop running the rw nut house

OverBurn

(1,289 posts)
38. So the buildings on fire, you can only save one. Live little baby lying in a crib or a box holding a hundred embryos.
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 05:23 PM
Feb 2024

Only one. Which do you choose asshole conservatives?

There's a difference, isn't there.

Layzeebeaver

(2,205 posts)
40. I read the title incorrectly...
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 06:20 PM
Feb 2024

Thought it said, Alabama Supreme Court Rules That Frozen Embryos Are 'Chicken'

Then again, it is Alabama.

pfitz59

(12,515 posts)
42. Alabama Constitution Section 36.06, which argues that each person was made in God's image
Mon Feb 19, 2024, 08:00 PM
Feb 2024

how can this be constitutional?

49. I checked and ...
Wed Feb 21, 2024, 09:42 AM
Feb 2024

The "image of God" language is not in the constitutional amendment.

I assume that is a quote from the court decision.

I would strongly argue that explicit references to any deity as a basis for public policy has no place in any official US or state government writing, with the Declaration of Independence being grandfathered in because it predates the US Constitution.

muriel_volestrangler

(105,821 posts)
52. Yeah; the judge implied the "image of God" stuff from one use of "Almighty God" in the preamble
Wed Feb 21, 2024, 12:17 PM
Feb 2024

of the Alabama constitution:

We, the people of the State of Alabama, in order to establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God, do ordain and establish the following Constitution and form of government for the State of Alabama

Hmm, wonder where they picked up that wording from? Why, from the treasonous, slave-holding Confederate States, of course:

Document: Constitution of the Confederate States of America Preamble

We, the people of the Confederate States, each State acting in its sovereign and independent character, in order to form a permanent federal government, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity — invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God — do ordain and establish this Constitution for the Confederate States of America.

https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=3&psid=3968

"God" then appears in the constitution only to say people have the right to worship God, and in a wording of an oath - nowhere else. So his argument is built on a hypocritical invocation of God by slave-owners.

The fundamentalist judge quotes endless Christians from centuries ago to justify his claim that blastocysts are "the image of God" (many from the time when no one had even seen an egg, sperm or newly-fertilized blastocyst, and had no idea of genes, chromosomes or anything else that conception involves). He's got Calvin and Thomas Aquinas on his side, guys! He quotes Blackstone, a British judge favoured by conservatives in love with the 18th century, and though he gives Blackstone's view that life "begins in contemplation of law as soon as an infant is able to stir in the mother's womb", he then contradicts that by saying "Similarly, Alabama law has recognized that human life begins at conception" - when, of course, that is not "similar", but "quite different".

If this opinion were given by a lower court, and a non-fundamentalist superior judge got a chance to review it, they'd rip it to shreds as completely un-American, and an attempt to establish a state religion.

Old Crank

(6,765 posts)
44. So when the companies in AL which do this shut down
Tue Feb 20, 2024, 06:07 AM
Feb 2024

because it will no longer be posible to stay in business when an accident sets you up for law suits do all the existing children get shipped to their parents or become wards of the state?

republianmushroom

(22,136 posts)
47. now texas is arguing a fetus isn't a baby and doesn't have rights
Tue Feb 20, 2024, 12:13 PM
Feb 2024

female prison guard 7 month pregnant
has labor pains on the job
prison doesn't let her leave for hours
baby is still born
hospital says if she got there earlier they could have saved the fetus

shes suing and the state is arguing “Just because several statutes define an individual to include an unborn child does not mean that the Fourteenth Amendment does the same,”

fuck this state. her supervisors should be charged with manslaughter at the least since the state has spend years claiming a fetus is a person. they contributed to its death.

https://www.texastribune.org/2023/08/11/texas-prison-lawsuit-fetal-rights/

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218171839

muriel_volestrangler

(105,821 posts)
48. The reliance on types of Christianity in the ruling is worse than the Huff Post report says
Wed Feb 21, 2024, 04:38 AM
Feb 2024
Alabama Supreme Court rules frozen embryos are children, cites the Bible in opinion

“When the People of Alabama adopted (the ‘sanctity of life’ provision of the state constitution), they did not use the term ‘inviolability,’ with its secular connotations, but rather they chose the term ‘sanctity,’ with all of its connotations,” Parker wrote. “This kind of acceptance is not foreign to our Constitution, which in its preamble ‘invok[es] the favor and guidance of Almighty God,’ … and which declares that ‘all men … are endowed [with life] by their Creator.’ The Alabama Constitution’s recognition that human life is an endowment from God emphasizes a foundational principle of English common law, which has been expressly incorporated as part of the law of Alabama.”

Parker then went on to cite two overtly Christian texts – “Theology Today” and “Manhattan Declaration: The Call of Christian Conscience” – to help define the phrase “sanctity of life” and argue that life begins at conception because, “all human beings bear God’s image from the moment of conception.”

From there, Parker went on to quote the Bible and another theological text that explained, in his words, “the significance of man’s creation in God’s image.”

Justice Greg Cook, the court’s lone dissenter, avoided the biblical arguments and instead focused on the laws as written, noting that nothing in the “wrongful death act” or Alabama law has defined an embryo as a “child.” Such a definition would be necessary to reach the court’s opinion, and it would need to be reached with legal arguments, not biblical ones.

https://www.alreporter.com/2024/02/19/alabama-supreme-court-rules-frozen-embryos-are-children-cites-the-bible-in-opinion/

"The Manhattan Declaration" is an infamous right-wing "declaration" that was done to oppose LGBT rights, abortion, stem cell research and so on. This is like citing a Republican manifesto in a decision.

Some religious leaders have criticized and protested the Manhattan Declaration, calling its principles in general, and its opposition to same-sex marriage in particular, contrary to the teachings of Jesus.[15][16][17] Catholic scholar Anthony Stevens-Arroyo wrote, "While two wars are being waged, with unemployment in double digits, the financial system of the world in suspense, these religious leaders declare that abortion, stem-cell use and same sex marriage override any other Gospel value. (You won't find Jesus saying anything about abortion or stem cells in the Gospel, but the Savior said a great deal about the homeless, the sick, and the hungry.) It's cheating to speak pious platitudes about Christianity and ignore Jesus' words."[18]

Some discussed the document as a political strategy, regarding it as the religious right's effort to re-establish its relevance in the public square,[19][20] but others noted that younger generations of evangelicals and Catholics were less likely to oppose same-sex marriage and more likely to prioritize economic issues over social, and that the document was thus unlikely to win them over.[20][21] Stevens-Arroyo criticized fellow Catholics who signed the declaration for aligning themselves with evangelicals in what he described as opposition to the separation of church and state.[22]

The declaration's invocation of Martin Luther King and of the principles of civil disobedience has also been questioned.[23][24] An editorial in the Los Angeles Times characterized the invocation of King as "specious" and criticized the document, belittling the "anecdotes" regarding restrictions on Christians' religious freedom as "of the sort radio talk-show hosts purvey" or from outside the United States, and noting that federal law already exempts "believers in some cases from having to comply with applicable laws."[25]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Declaration:_A_Call_of_Christian_Conscience#Criticism

dalton99a

(92,821 posts)
50. Their Chief Justice:
Wed Feb 21, 2024, 11:00 AM
Feb 2024
“Even before birth, all human beings have the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory,” Chief Justice Tom Parker wrote in a concurring opinion, citing scripture.


-------------------------------

This asshole went to Darmouth and Vanderbilt

underpants

(195,550 posts)
51. Al Abama. Yoga was not allowed in public schools for 30 years.
Wed Feb 21, 2024, 11:35 AM
Feb 2024

Yes this article is from 2021.

Alabama Will Now Allow Yoga In Its Public Schools (But Students Can't Say 'Namaste')


Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey has signed a bill to allow public schools to offer yoga, ending a ban that stood for nearly 30 years. Christian conservatives who back the ban said yoga would open the door for people to be converted to Hinduism.

The new law allows yoga to be offered as an elective for grades K-12. While it erases a ban that, over the years, some schools had not realized existed, it also imposes restrictions on how yoga should be taught. Students won't be allowed to say, "Namaste," for instance. Meditation is not allowed.

"Chanting, mantras, mudras, use of mandalas, induction of hypnotic states, guided imagery, and namaste greetings shall be expressly prohibited," the bill states. It also requires English names be used for all poses and exercises. And before any students try a tree pose, they'll need a parent's permission slip.
https://www.npr.org/2021/05/21/999020140/its-now-legal-to-practice-yoga-in-alabamas-public-schools

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Alabama Supreme Court Rul...