A Supreme Court decision could come Monday in a case about barring Trump from the 2024 ballot
Source: AP
Updated 1:16 PM EST, March 3, 2024
WASHINGTON (AP) A Supreme Court decision could come as soon as Monday in the case about whether former President Donald Trump can be kicked off the ballot over his efforts to undo his defeat in the 2020 election. Trump is challenging a groundbreaking decision by the Colorado Supreme Court that said he is disqualified from being president again and ineligible for the states primary, which is Tuesday.
The resolution of the case on Monday, a day before Super Tuesday contests in 16 states, would remove uncertainty about whether votes for Trump, the leading Republican candidate for president, will ultimately count. Both sides had requested fast work by the court, which heard arguments less than a month ago, on Feb. 8.
The Colorado court was the first to invoke a post-Civil War constitutional provision aimed at preventing those who engaged in insurrection from holding office. Trump also has since been barred from primary ballot in Illinois and Maine, though both decisions, along with Colorados, are on hold pending the outcome of the Supreme Court case.
The Supreme Court has until now never ruled on the provision, Section 3 of the 14th amendment. The court indicated Sunday there will be at least one case decided Monday, adhering to its custom of not saying which one. But it also departed from its usual practice in some respects, heightening the expectation that its the Trump ballot case that will be handed down.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-trump-capitol-riot-colorado-maine-d784759ab9376d4c3a6e3ae72465f448
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,004 posts)jimfields33
(15,808 posts)case. At least a month.
onenote
(42,704 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(10,004 posts)barbaraann
(9,151 posts)Last edited Sun Mar 3, 2024, 04:02 PM - Edit history (1)
Last refuge of scoundrels works, too.
CousinIT
(9,245 posts)Regardless, Trump will be on the ballot. I don't give a rat about this (because we all know they will not do what the Constitution says and keep him off of it) except to note that they will decide to get their asses in gear to help their sociopath dictator.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,010 posts)Orrex
(63,213 posts)Strict originalists, this lot.
mysteryowl
(7,390 posts)it will be in turmps favor. They won't remove him from the ballot, which is why they are speedy on this one.
Corrupt court!
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,291 posts)Tomorrow may be interesting. I want to see if there are dissents
Link to tweet
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-release-decisions-monday-trump-colorado-ruling-strong-po-rcna141567
The court noted on its website on Sunday afternoon that rulings are expected.
Trump is currently set to appear on the state primary ballot on Tuesday after a hold was placed on the Colorado Supreme Court ruling that deemed him ineligible due to his efforts to defy the 2020 election results.
The U.S. Supreme Court held oral arguments on Feb. 8 on whether Trump can be barred from the ballot because of his role leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Section 3 of the Constitutions 14th Amendment says people are not eligible to serve in government if they engaged in insurrection. It appeared from the oral argument that Trump would win the case.
EndlessWire
(6,536 posts)The primary is on Tuesday, so they have to get the results in there about whether they have to count votes for Donald. So, I think it's still 50/50. This will indicate whether they think that Donald is a traitor. Excuse me, an insurrectionist.
bdamomma
(63,868 posts)but didn't the Colorado Judges also mention that he was insurrectionist, but the SC did not mention if he was or was not.?
Zeitghost
(3,862 posts)The Supreme Court has not and will not determine if Trump or anyone else engaged in insurrection. They are not a trial court.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,291 posts)bluestarone
(16,959 posts)Kinda like DUH! Why would they decide to remove him from the ballots, when one corner of their mouth they say we,ll decide immunity in APRIL?? They WILL alow his name on the ballots. No doubt in my mind.
johnnyfins
(823 posts)Case for April, because they ARE barring him from running and the trial timeline is meaningless?
SomewhereInTheMiddle
(285 posts)I could see the court deciding that Trump is ineligible for office and then ruling that he - and ONLY he - had immunity for crimes committed in (and after) office.
That would mean Trump will never be president again but would not go to jail.
Probably the end state Trump most wants. And one that the rest of us would grudgingly accept.
I don't think any of that would be legal (except keeping him out of office), but it would solve a lot of problems.
Which means it is unlikely to happen.
SomewhereInTheMiddle
(285 posts)Court ruling just came out. He can run in Colorado.
wolfie001
(2,240 posts)Is there any effing doubt?
Polybius
(15,423 posts)The decision will be at minimum 7-2. Probably 9-0.
Novara
(5,842 posts)There's no way he should be involved. No fucking way.
bluestarone
(16,959 posts)Never thought i would see THIS SC so OWNED!! RELIGION and MONEY!! TFG along with the help of Mitch McConnell, DESTROYED Democracy as we knew it! I don't know the end game here for our country, BUT all we can do at the moment is VOTE LIKE HELL!!
c-rational
(2,593 posts)bdamomma
(63,868 posts)do they think we are that stupid. Senator Whitehouse has been a fighter on this right along regarding dark money and Leonard Leo, Opus Dei influences. Crap that jerk McConnell that bastard, he did this too.
Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)It cant survive crooked courts. They will distort destroy the intent of the constitution.
kimbutgar
(21,155 posts)He owns those 6 justices with help from Putin.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,349 posts)It has proven that it ignores the Consitution, law, logic, precedent, and consequences in its quest to advance its extreme ideology. We are a nation under attack so long as this court legislates for RW extremists.
Bluethroughu
(5,172 posts)Pack the court.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,291 posts)Bluethroughu
(5,172 posts)What it does not state.
Will they wipe their butt with the Constitution or stand strong for the rule of law?
I do not trust judgement, because their bought and paid for RVs, real estate, tuition, trips, parental lifestyles, and significant others' jobs , from their billionaire benefactors making money from cases they will not recuse from.
William Seger
(10,778 posts)... then they damn well better explain how the 14th can be enforced. Just ignoring it is not an option.
Silent Type
(2,906 posts)subject to a firing squad for insurrection.
AncientOfDays
(163 posts)1 - they declare him ineligible
2 - they say doesn't apply to him
or (this is what I think will happen)
3 - they will kick the can down the road - say something else has to be adjudicated/etc.
C Moon
(12,213 posts)Kablooie
(18,634 posts)Ill bet the immunity decision wont come until a day after the election.
Thats if the decision is that hes not immune.
But they might decide he IS immune from prosecution, yes they might.
Then it will be released much earlier and if Trump wins, he will be totally free from any consequences no matter what he does.
He could even throw Biden in jail, in defiance of this decision, and no one could do anything to him.
onetexan
(13,041 posts)You forget any decision on presidential immunity will apply to current POTUS as well.
The Grand Illuminist
(1,332 posts)He threatened the same to Hillary. But he never followed through.
Bucky
(54,014 posts)But the Supreme Court is effectively nullifying the 14th Amendment's insurrection clause. That's not within their power. Tactically, it's better for us to have Trump to run against. But chucking the law for convenience's sake is almost as bad as the SCOTUS chucking the Constitution for the sake of loyalty to a fascist cult of personality.
his ass!!!!! but you never know we have now to November, anything can happen. I leave it at that.
msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)Kid Berwyn
(14,907 posts)Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
republianmushroom
(13,597 posts)SWBTATTReg
(22,130 posts)stupid insurrection clause ever take effect? This is WRONG.
Zeitghost
(3,862 posts)Or possibly some other act of Congress.
SWBTATTReg
(22,130 posts)any of these require at least a standing of good morals?
Zeitghost
(3,862 posts)A criminal conviction for a relevant federal crime under a congressionally established law (like the Insurrection Act) would be one way to make that determination. An act of Congress or impeachment conviction would likely be others.
The decision of a state court in a civil trial is not. The Supreme Court, including three outstanding liberal justices made that very clear.