Biden Backs Bill That Could Ban TikTok: 'If They Pass It, I'll Sign It'
Source: Rolling Stone
CONGRESS WAS FLOODED with phone calls this week from angry teens opposing a bill that could potentially ban TikTok. President Joe Biden isnt worried about the controversy. On Friday, he told reporters he plans to sign the legislation if it passes.
The statement comes as Bidens likely 2024 opponent Donald Trump has started backing away from his past efforts to ban TikTok, and is now publicly defending the popular platform a decision that some observers speculate could be related to a Republican megadonors financial interests in TikToks parent company.
Biden said Friday he would sign the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, should it pass through Congress. The bill would require TikToks parent company ByteDance to sell the viral video app within six months, or be blocked from being accessed in the United States.
If they pass it, Ill sign it, Biden stated, according to CBS News. The legislation will move to the House floor for a vote next week, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) revealed on X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday. The bill swiftly made it through the House Energy and Commerce Committee with unanimous support this week after being introduced on Tuesday.
Read more: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/joe-biden-tiktok-ban-bill-1234984110/
Jaime Harrison told me Tik Tok was an important tool to reach young voters.
I_UndergroundPanther
(13,369 posts)Facebook, and X are hemorrhaging money and cant compete.
I hope Biden does not sign it.
I like the openness of tik tok and like it isnt a total right wing cesspool.
getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)I created an account just play around and ended up with several hundred followers in a couple of weeks, all bots. They all w a need me to send them gift cards.
Unbelievable.
It was addictive though, until it became obnoxiously repetitive.
RubyRose
(318 posts)SoFlaBro
(3,777 posts)samnsara
(18,767 posts)Autumn
(48,950 posts)PortTack
(35,820 posts)VeryProgressive
(77 posts)He really shouldn't support this legislation. I am surprised. He could lose some younger voters.
womanofthehills
(10,988 posts)55% of Americans view TicToc.
AZLD4Candidate
(6,766 posts)that reports on its crap. The CCP is the biggest hypocrite in this area.
Personally, after living there as long as I did, I believe all CCP things should be blocked, banned, or heavily restricted and regulated as security risks.
CTyankee
(68,152 posts)good speech...don't censor." The government should not be telling us which speech is bad and should be censored and which is OK and can be published." It's an old, old argument and I thought that here, of all places, we would not see all this crying for censorship of ideas we don't like and are offensive.
AZLD4Candidate
(6,766 posts)Tik Tok is a threat to national security as a foreign propaganda tool owned by an entity that has ties to a foreign government.
CCP doesn't want to do IPOs in the US because they know it would be subject to American regulators with means all books would be opened. Tik Tok is the same.
Free speech can be restricted on foreign entities with ties to foreign governments.
CTyankee
(68,152 posts)I happen to agree with much of what you are presenting here. It is very serious. I once worked for the national ACLU (I was Aryeh Neier's executive assistant when he was national director). I attended all of the organization's national board meetings where policy was debated. I'd be very interested in knowing what they have to say!
Just found it here: https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-raises-concerns-about-senate-bill-aimed-at-banning-tiktok
AZLD4Candidate
(6,766 posts)to either sell to an American company so it can be regulated by American auditors (which the Chinese government refuses to allow if they want to bring one of their companies to the US) or the foreign company loses the privilege of doing business in the US. Its the same as saying "follow the laws we have or we revoke your business license."
Saying banning tik tok is Communist party propaganda. It's all over my wife's Chinese version of Tik Tok, douyin, with them saying "see, Americans hate us."
The ACLU should say nothing since it's an interstate commerce issue which the Constitution says Congress can regulate. Byte Dance is a foreign company being allowed to do business here.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,901 posts)MichMan
(17,105 posts)progressoid
(53,125 posts)getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)Its a sale.
From foreign oligarchs to domestic.
But it isn't a shutdown or ban.
progressoid
(53,125 posts)It's literally in this OP and most stories. That's all they'll see. That's what this whole thing is going to be perceived by the public.
Regardless, I've asked this elsewhere, "why Tiktok and not other China based apps?"
For instance, CapCut is also owned by ByteDance, the same company that started TikTok. They are the 4th most popular Chinese app in the US (Tiktok is #2) Why does this law ignore them?
IMHO, its because the right wing has made TikTok their boogey man for a while now. They need a political win. This ban/sale/whatever you want to call it is a win for them and a kick in the crotch for Dems.
People, especially young people, like Tiktok. Half of their users are under 34. Pew Research said roughly 60% of the apps news consumers are Democrats or Democrat-leaning. Fuck with it and you fuck with our re-election success.
Of course, let's not mention the irony of the President's campaign recently opening a Tiktok account.
The ByteDance-owned CapCut video editing app gathers significant amounts of private data, including facial scans, from its 200 million active users, generating huge profits and potentially allowing the Chinese government to access that data, according to a proposed class action lawsuit filed in an Illinois federal court.
...https://therecord.media/capcut-privacy-lawsuit-illinois-bipa-bytedance-china
ificandream
(11,836 posts)He'll make it into a Twitter/Musk clone. It's bad enough Twitter has been ruined.