Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,060 posts)
Fri Mar 15, 2024, 04:45 PM Mar 15

Judge delays Trump's hush-money criminal trial until mid-April, citing last-minute evidence dump

Last edited Fri Mar 15, 2024, 08:23 PM - Edit history (2)

Source: AP

Updated 6:26 PM EDT, March 15, 2024


NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump’s New York hush-money criminal trial was delayed Friday until at least mid-April as the judge seeks answers about a last-minute evidence dump that the former president’s lawyers said has hampered their ability to prepare their defense.

Manhattan Judge Juan Manuel Merchan agreed to a 30-day delay starting Friday and scheduled a hearing for March 25 after Trump’s lawyers complained that they only recently started receiving more than 100,000 pages of documents from a previous federal investigation into the matter.

The trial had been scheduled to start on March 25. The delay means the trial would start no earlier than April 15. Prosecutors had said they wouldn’t object to a short delay. Trump’s lawyers have requested a three-month delay as well as asking for the case to be thrown out.

In a statement Friday, the Trump campaign continued to argue that the case “has no basis in law or fact, and should be dismissed.”
In a letter Friday, Merchan told Manhattan prosecutors and Trump’s defense team that he wanted to assess “who, if anyone, is at fault for the late production of the documents,” whether it hurt either side and whether any sanctions are warranted

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/trump-hush-money-criminal-trial-delay-8e41f4be00f0420056433d2381189df8



Article updated.

Previous article -

Updated 5:14 PM EDT, March 15, 2024


NEW YORK (AP) -- Donald Trump's hush-money criminal trial was delayed Friday until at least mid-April as the judge seeks answers about a last-minute evidence dump that the former president's lawyers said has hampered their ability to prepare their defense.

Manhattan Judge Juan Manuel Merchan agreed to a 30-day delay starting Friday and set a hearing for March 25 to decide whether prosecutors should face sanctions or the case should be dismissed after Trump's lawyers complained that they only recently started receiving more than 100,000 pages of documents from a previous federal investigation into the matter.

The New York trial had been scheduled to start on March 25. The delay means the trial would start no earlier than April 15. In a letter Friday, Merchan told Manhattan prosecutors and Trump's defense team that he wanted to assess "who, if anyone, is at fault for the late production of the documents," whether it hurt either side and whether any sanctions are warranted.

The judge demanded a timeline of events detailing when the documents were requested and when they were turned over. He said he also want all correspondence between the Manhattan district attorney's office, which is prosecuting Trump, and the U.S. attorney's office, which previously investigated the matter in 2018.



Original article/headline -

Judge delays Trump's hush-money criminal trial 30 days, citing last-minute evidence dump

Updated 4:42 PM EDT, March 15, 2024


NEW YORK (AP) -- A judge on Friday delayed former President Donald Trump's hush-money criminal trial until at least mid-April after his lawyers said they needed more time to sift through a profusion of evidence they only recently obtained from a previous federal investigation into the matter.

Judge Juan Manuel Merchan agreed to a 30-day postponement and scheduled a hearing for March 25 to address questions about the evidence dump. The trial had been slated to start on March 25. It is among four criminal indictments against Trump, the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee.

Trump's lawyers wanted a 90-day delay, which would've pushed the start of the trial into the early summer. Prosecutors said they were OK with a 30-day adjournment "in an abundance of caution and to ensure that defendant has sufficient time to review the new materials."

Trump's lawyers said they have received tens of thousands of pages of evidence in the last two weeks from the U.S. attorney's office in Manhattan, which investigated the hush money arrangement while Trump was president.


16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

getagrip_already

(14,757 posts)
2. 10's of thousands of pages.... oooh, so scary (not)
Fri Mar 15, 2024, 05:06 PM
Mar 15

Let's get real. Most are emails. A couple of lines long. Some are phone logs, with one call listed on a particular day between two phone numbers.

With legal software, they could sort through the dump in a few days and find anything of interest.

It's not a daunting task. 30 days is very generous.

PortTack

(32,771 posts)
3. All the same, imagine if they had not given them time....could've meant even longer delays and stupid filings
Fri Mar 15, 2024, 05:49 PM
Mar 15

About the unfairness!

One chance to get it all right.

Also, it’s just further along in the election cycle, so worse for orange man

getagrip_already

(14,757 posts)
5. Not complaining about giving them time to review
Fri Mar 15, 2024, 05:57 PM
Mar 15

Every defendent, even this disgusting pig, deserves that.

I do blame the doj for intentionally screwing this c as se up, imho.

onenote

(42,704 posts)
10. Bragg's filing points a finger at Trump's team, not DOJ.
Fri Mar 15, 2024, 07:06 PM
Mar 15

Here's Bragg's filing. https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24481288/20240314-peoples-notice.pdf

Moreover, to the extent a finger can be pointed at the US Attorney's Office, folks like Joyce Vance and Andrew Weissman do not see this as being Garland's fault.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218778793

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218778793#post2

getagrip_already

(14,757 posts)
13. I didnt say garland, except by neglect
Fri Mar 15, 2024, 07:20 PM
Mar 15

I said it was doj's fault. That is undeniable.

It isn't Braggs fault.

Sure, trumps team was complicit, but they didn't stop the doj from fulfilling Braggs request last year. They didn't stop the doj from fulfilling their own request months ago

That was all on the doj's own decision and timeline..

Garland should have taken control of this office years ago.

He should have issued a simple set of directives to all field offices. Any decisions that could possibly impact prosecutions, either state or federal, of anything dealing with with trump or his aides must be reported to his office. Period.

He just didn't care. He would rather not know.

CanonRay

(14,103 posts)
4. I would really, really like to know who at DOJ/NY pulled this last minute bullshit
Fri Mar 15, 2024, 05:57 PM
Mar 15

Whoever it is should be indicted for obstructing justice.

getagrip_already

(14,757 posts)
6. Unfortunately, the inspector general is a trump apointee
Fri Mar 15, 2024, 06:01 PM
Mar 15

The fucker had barr fire the previous ig and then appointed this one.

Garland left him in place.

He hasn't followed up on a single doj misdeed under barr.

onenote

(42,704 posts)
9. Where do you get this information? The DOJ Inspector General is an Obama appointee.
Fri Mar 15, 2024, 06:57 PM
Mar 15

Michael E. Horowitz was sworn in on April 16, 2012 -- during Obama's administration.
https://oig.justice.gov/about/meet-ig

GB_RN

(2,355 posts)
12. I Think I Know What's Happened Here...
Fri Mar 15, 2024, 07:19 PM
Mar 15

I think the person you were replying to possibly conflated/confused the IG with the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The original US Atty was running the investigation into tRump and Barr tried firing him, but the guy was pretty savvy about it and managed to keep Barr from putting a flunky in. Still, the investigation was basically dropped.

dickthegrouch

(3,174 posts)
7. If it's all pertaining to a previous case
Fri Mar 15, 2024, 06:24 PM
Mar 15

Doesn’t the defendant already have it. Id hope it was TSF’s problem if he didn’t make it available to his defense team.

BumRushDaShow

(129,060 posts)
8. That "previous (federal) case"
Fri Mar 15, 2024, 06:35 PM
Mar 15

was one that he was never a defendant in - only his lawyer (Cohen) and some of his other employees (I think maybe Weisselberg), as well as Stormy Daniels, were involved. I even think I recall one of those "payments" might have been signed by Eric (but that is fuzzy memory - I remember seeing an image of the paperwork (I think maybe invoices) that was signed off approving the monthly payments to Cohen).

Botany

(70,510 posts)
15. This last minute document dump was in large part because of Trump's attorneys who just asked ..
Sat Mar 16, 2024, 12:50 PM
Mar 16

… for them even though they were well aware of them last summer. It is just a delaying action,

Once again Trump and his attorneys have found a way to delay justice. I am starting to think
TFG will never see the inside of a prison cell.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge delays Trump's hush...