UK judge refuses Trump's appeal in suit related to Steele dossier
Source: CNN Politics
Published 8:03 PM EDT, Fri March 29, 2024
CNN A London appellate justice refused former President Donald Trumps request to appeal the dismissal of his case against retired British spy Christopher Steeles company over his controversial 2016 dossier.
The former president had sought permission to appeal Judge Karen Steyns February judgement that Trumps data privacy case which argued that Steele harmed his reputation by peddling egregiously inaccurate claims about his Russian ties lacked merit and should be thrown out. Steyn also ordered Trump to pay £300,000 in legal fees to Steeles company, Orbis Business Intelligence, which Trump requested to be stayed.
In his order Wednesday, Lord Justice Mark Warby said Trumps appeal would have no real prospect of success, finding that some of the presumptive Republican presidential nominees arguments were contradictory and his appeal attempted to offer new points that he didnt present before Steyn.
The ruling comes as a loss for Trump, who has already been hit with more than a half a billion dollars in legal penalties this year. The former president faces a deadline to post a $175 million bond next week following a New York civil fraud trial, and he has been ordered to pay E. Jean Carroll $83.3 million dollars in her civil defamation case. Trump also faces his own legal fees in four separate criminal cases. Steele celebrated the ruling, telling CNN in a statement Friday that he is grateful.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/29/politics/donald-trump-steele-dossier-appeal/index.html
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,064 posts)wolfie001
(2,297 posts)His cult always gives him a free pass while being grifted 24/7. Over and over again.
UpInArms
(51,290 posts)Is $323,794.73
Looks like TFG is headed for the billionaire debtor club
KS Toronado
(17,434 posts)mwooldri
(10,303 posts)...which he can apply for permission to appeal. However if the appeals court says they won't hear the appeal, it's quite unlikely the Supreme Court will give permission.
Cough up, Brokeahontas.
Talitha
(6,635 posts)That's brilliant!
NoMoreRepugs
(9,503 posts)3Hotdogs
(12,456 posts)He's a billionaire. He can afford it.
NanaCat
(1,452 posts)When it comes to defamation. Unlike in the US, they do not require proving malice aforethought to rule in a plaintiff's favour. If the crap people say about you damages you, malice intended or not, the courts can be quite sympathetic.
Given that leniency, I was really surprised that TSF lost this lawsuit. That he couldn't get a defamation case to stick in the UK, of all places, shows how utterly divorced his claims are from reality.
Or maybe it's that the court decided they wouldn't put up with rot from a perpetually whinging titty baby Yank against a British citizen. Unspoken tribal loyalty isn't unheard of among the lords and ladies of the High Court.
PatSeg
(47,717 posts)They're not going to put up with this crass, vulgar American. Christopher Steele has far more credibility than Donald Trump. Plus the whole world knows what a corrupt con artist Trump is and they've grown tired of his bullshit.
FakeNoose
(32,864 posts)The UK courts would probably welcome it.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,405 posts)I think they knew that, since Orbis and Steele didn't publish it, they couldn't be taken to court for libel.
PatSeg
(47,717 posts)I wonder if he's broken any records as to how much money he's spent on lawyers just since leaving the White House.
Botany
(70,635 posts)So far not one thing in the Steele Dossier has been disproven. As a matter of fact Trump proved
a major part of true as President with all the money he took from China, Saudi Arabia, and Russia.
*. Alfa Bank (Putins operation) 2,500 contacts with the Trump Campaigns server in Lititiz, PA
Talitha
(6,635 posts)According to onlineconversion.com that's $378,663.
Jimvanhise
(304 posts)The Mueller report states that people in the Trump campaign had more than 100 contacts with people later identified as Russian operatives. When those campaign people were asked about what was discussed at those meetings, they all said that they "don't remember."