Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorro

(15,778 posts)
Mon Apr 29, 2024, 08:57 PM Apr 29

Regulator Investigates Ford's Hands-Free Driving System After Fatal Crashes

Source: Wall Street Journal

U.S. auto-safety regulators have launched an investigation into the safety of Ford Motor’s hands-free driving system, following a pair of recent crashes that left three people dead.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the auto industry’s top regulator, said in a filing made public Monday that it had received notice of two recent incidents involving BlueCruise, Ford’s driver-assistance system.

In both cases, Ford Mustang Mach-E SUVs collided with stationary vehicles on highways during nighttime lighting conditions, each resulting in a fatality, NHTSA said.

NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation confirmed that BlueCruise was engaged in each of the vehicles in question immediately before the collisions, according to an initial review by the agency.

Read more: https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/nhtsa-receives-notice-of-two-incidents-involving-fords-driver-assistance-system-510fc6e9?st=rfb1l10vzwi8uyq&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Regulator Investigates Ford's Hands-Free Driving System After Fatal Crashes (Original Post) Zorro Apr 29 OP
GOOD! elleng Apr 29 #1
Cars don't drive them selves. Arne Apr 29 #2
so bizarre -- how many people get to die in these weird -ass crashes orleans Apr 30 #3
What is more stressful? Aussie105 Apr 30 #4
How many have to die? Aussie105 Apr 30 #5
I have and use this feature...ask me anything radicalleft Apr 30 #6

orleans

(34,147 posts)
3. so bizarre -- how many people get to die in these weird -ass crashes
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 02:42 AM
Apr 30

because people didn't want to "drive" while driving their fucking cars??

Aussie105

(5,584 posts)
4. What is more stressful?
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 02:57 AM
Apr 30

Driving a dumb car knowing you need to concentrate, turn the steering wheel and work the pedals?

Or driving some smart car, expecting it to do things for you, but needing to be super alert just in case it gets it wrong?

Don't want to drive? Get a Taxi, an Uber, public transport for crying out loud! Sit back, chill out, read a book or something.
Or tell Jeeves to tell the driver to bring the Rolls around the front, so you can sit in the back and raid the cocktail bar.

I like cars. I like computers.

Mating them together in a thing on wheels, not so much.

Aussie105

(5,584 posts)
5. How many have to die?
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 03:50 AM
Apr 30

I remember a few decades ago a certain make and model of small car (*) was known to catch fire in a rear end crash.
Something about the fuel tank rupturing in a crash.

That car was taken off the market, never to return.

How many people need to die before the self-drive aspect of some modern cars is legislated out of existence?
Or manufacturers stop offering the feature?

(*) "The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigated rear-end collisions involving 1970-’76 Ford Pintos and Mercury Bobcats resulting in fuel spillage and fire. NHTSA concluded that 27 Pinto occupants had died in these crashes and a further 24 Pinto occupants sustained non-fatal burn injuries."

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Regulator Investigates Fo...