Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jose Garcia

(3,400 posts)
Thu Jun 13, 2024, 09:48 AM Jun 2024

Supreme Court Ruling in Starbucks Case Curbs Labor Regulation

Source: New York Times

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Starbucks on Thursday in a challenge against a labor ruling by a federal judge, making it more difficult for a key federal agency to intervene when a company is accused of illegally suppressing labor organizing.

Eight justices backed the majority opinion, which was written by Justice Clarence Thomas. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote a separate opinion concurring with parts of the majority opinion, dissenting from other portions and agreeing with the overall judgment.

The ruling came in a case brought by Starbucks over the firing of seven workers in Memphis who were trying to unionize a store in 2022. The company said it had fired them for allowing a television crew into a closed store, while the workers said that they were fired for their unionization efforts and that the company didn’t typically enforce the rules they were accused of violating.

After the firings, the National Labor Relations Board issued a complaint saying that Starbucks had acted because the workers had “joined or assisted the union and engaged in concerted activities, and to discourage employees from engaging in these activities.” Separately, lawyers for the board asked a federal judge in Tennessee for an injunction reinstating the workers, and the judge issued the order in August 2022.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/13/business/economy/supreme-court-starbucks-nlrb.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court Ruling in Starbucks Case Curbs Labor Regulation (Original Post) Jose Garcia Jun 2024 OP
🤔 ColinC Jun 2024 #1
As close to unanimous as you can get. jimfields33 Jun 2024 #2
If it were an evenly divided court I imagine there would be at least one full dissenting opinion ColinC Jun 2024 #3
Definitely for sure. jimfields33 Jun 2024 #4
As far as I am concerned a company should not have the right to interfere LiberalFighter Jun 2024 #5
Written by Clarence the Clown orangecrush Jun 2024 #6
And endorsed by the other eight. former9thward Jun 2024 #7
 

jimfields33

(19,382 posts)
2. As close to unanimous as you can get.
Thu Jun 13, 2024, 09:59 AM
Jun 2024

I like 9-0 decisions. Yes justice brown didn’t like a few parts, but overall the justices were happy with it.

ColinC

(11,098 posts)
3. If it were an evenly divided court I imagine there would be at least one full dissenting opinion
Thu Jun 13, 2024, 10:02 AM
Jun 2024

LiberalFighter

(53,544 posts)
5. As far as I am concerned a company should not have the right to interfere
Thu Jun 13, 2024, 12:05 PM
Jun 2024

It is not a company employee organization.

If so then employees should have the right to be part of the Chamber of Commerce.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court Ruling in S...