Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,761 posts)
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 10:02 AM Jul 2024

Texas city to vote on banning patients from traveling through it for abortion

Source: The Guardian

Fri 19 Jul 2024 09.00 EDT


A city nestled in the northern tip of Texas, which was at the heart of a major US supreme court case over abortion rights this year, has found itself at the forefront of the abortion wars once again.

Come November, residents of Amarillo, Texas, will vote on an ordinance that would declare Amarillo a “sanctuary city for the unborn” and ban people from helping patients travel through Amarillo to access abortions – what the ordinance calls “abortion trafficking”. It would also ban people from possessing or distributing abortion pills within Amarillo city limits.

Over the last several months, a string of Texas localities have passed similar ordinances. Amarillo’s city council spent months arguing over whether to pass its own “sanctuary city” ordinance, but in June, the council officially rejected it. However, while the ordinance languished before the council, a separate group gathered enough signatures for the ordinance to appear on Amarillo’s November ballot.

Although the city council is still deliberating the language to describe the ordinance on the ballot, activists in the city are already gearing up to campaign against it. “We are ready,” said Lindsay London, an activist with the Amarillo Reproductive Freedom Alliance. “Travel bans harm communities. They harm the privacy of medical relationships. They do not help our communities to be strong and safe and supported.”

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/19/texas-abortion-travel-ban

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas city to vote on banning patients from traveling through it for abortion (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jul 2024 OP
And enforce this how? pfitz59 Jul 2024 #1
It'll be like slavery times BumRushDaShow Jul 2024 #4
Exactly what I was thinking. . . . BigDemVoter Jul 2024 #14
That's what they're aiming for, they don't want men to lose the last slaves they own Warpy Jul 2024 #37
It is a license for the police to stop any car Miguelito Loveless Jul 2024 #5
Wow! Bold ordinance Zilli Jul 2024 #11
I bet a reward for snitching DBoon Jul 2024 #27
The conservative GOP. Getting government off of our backs since 1981. Midnight Writer Jul 2024 #2
Can't be enforced and it's unconstitutional. TwilightZone Jul 2024 #3
In addition it would violate plenty of "freedom to travel" moniss Jul 2024 #6
Precedent doesn't matter with this court. NutmegYankee Jul 2024 #36
While the current SC does throw moniss Jul 2024 #40
Unconstitutional doesn't count in Texas Attilatheblond Jul 2024 #7
With the current disreputable gang of thieves and villains on SCOTUS, 'constitutional' is a fluid term. (n/t) Moostache Jul 2024 #17
Didn't they try this before? Or was it another Texas city? SupportSanity Jul 2024 #8
Don't these "Christian" eff-twitts have something better to do? Grins Jul 2024 #9
People in the past writing about the 21st Century: We're gonna have flying cars and day trips to the moon ck4829 Jul 2024 #10
Even more important then! liberalgunwilltravel Jul 2024 #13
am still waiting for one that folds into a briefcase when u reach your destination after landing AllaN01Bear Jul 2024 #23
Incredible liberalgunwilltravel Jul 2024 #12
This is nuts Marthe48 Jul 2024 #15
Magnifying glass and ants. LastDemocratInSC Jul 2024 #30
My older brother was the same Marthe48 Jul 2024 #35
Time for a convoy through Texas... Moostache Jul 2024 #16
The Thought Police have arrived! 3825-87867 Jul 2024 #18
Oh well, there goes their economy! LeftInTX Jul 2024 #19
Yep. I used to visit Texas for tourism, conventions and concerts. Not anymore. Texas is dead to me. Fuck Texas. ArkansasDemocrat1 Jul 2024 #21
I believe l-40 in the Northern Panhandle.covers about 170 miles Prof. Toru Tanaka Jul 2024 #31
Freedom to travel is in the Constitution, but it entrusts enforcement to the states. Tough luck, Texans. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #20
TMW repukes thought slave catching laws were a good idea sakabatou Jul 2024 #22
Idiots. What do they plan to do? Stop all cars with women and administer pregnancy tests? Vinca Jul 2024 #24
"Feel-good" but totally unenforceable law jmowreader Jul 2024 #25
Got stuff stolen out of our car in Amarillo. Never ever passing through again! Freethinker65 Jul 2024 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author ArkansasDemocrat1 Jul 2024 #33
Republican - the party of assholes. n/t SpankMe Jul 2024 #28
Thats going to go over real well on I-40 n/t gay texan Jul 2024 #29
I forgot to mention in my earlier post Prof. Toru Tanaka Jul 2024 #32
The future is Three Words ArkansasDemocrat1 Jul 2024 #34
MAGAt, handmaiden, christofascist Texas horseshit. Magoo48 Jul 2024 #38
I am so fucking sick of these assholes. Scalded Nun Jul 2024 #39
Hey Amarillo, go suck an egg. Talitha Jul 2024 #41
It would be interesting if people started boycotting corporations/organizations who are doing business in that town. Dave Bowman Jul 2024 #42
IIRC, Amarillo is blue BumRushDaShow Jul 2024 #43
LOL Amarillo. Blue. Pull the other one Zoomie1986 Aug 2024 #47
Oh really? ck4829 Aug 2024 #44
How will they know? mcar Aug 2024 #45
The kookery never ends with the christo-fascists Mysterian Aug 2024 #46

Warpy

(114,615 posts)
37. That's what they're aiming for, they don't want men to lose the last slaves they own
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 02:07 PM
Jul 2024

but they'll soon find out they have no jurisdiction over any US highway that runs through the area.

Setting up roadblocks on state roads will be as popular as cancer.

It's just feel good crap to protect the fee-fees of panicky mediocre men.

Miguelito Loveless

(5,752 posts)
5. It is a license for the police to stop any car
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 10:47 AM
Jul 2024

carrying any woman or women believed to be of childbearing years. No way this will be abused. Also, a great opportunity for the usual crop of bad cops to demand bribes or extort sex from women.

Zilli

(286 posts)
11. Wow! Bold ordinance
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 11:17 AM
Jul 2024

So, I picture every car traveling on the roads of any of these cities, being stopped and every woman being subjected to a roadside GYN exam and just to be clearer maybe incarceration until all of the lab work and pregenacy testing is completed...... amirite?
the new amerikkkan way.

TwilightZone

(28,836 posts)
3. Can't be enforced and it's unconstitutional.
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 10:28 AM
Jul 2024

Just ask Brett Kavanaugh.

"In a concurring opinion last month, Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh said the Constitution did not allow states to stop women from traveling to get abortions."

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/11/us/politics/the-right-to-travel-in-a-post-roe-world.html

moniss

(9,056 posts)
6. In addition it would violate plenty of "freedom to travel"
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 10:52 AM
Jul 2024

decisions the court has made over the many years. If you allowed this to happen you could end up with cities blocking travel for any reason they wanted to. Imagine a city saying we don't want people with brown hair or are Democrats or who are renters rather than homeowners.

NutmegYankee

(16,478 posts)
36. Precedent doesn't matter with this court.
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 01:59 PM
Jul 2024

And the Right to Travel is an un-enumerated right under the 9th Amendment, so per the SCOTUS decision on abortion, it doesn't exist.

moniss

(9,056 posts)
40. While the current SC does throw
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 03:02 PM
Jul 2024

anything it wants when it wants the analysis of whether it would violate precedent is just a thing on it's face. Like anything in the legal realm if nobody is going to comply or uphold it will lose meaning other than being factually correct. As far as the right to travel goes this particular activity also involves commerce as opposed to simply being "moving from one location to another". The commerce component is very important because there is also lots of case law regarding states and municipalities trying to hamstring other jurisdictions/people/businesses with prohibitions, taxes, fees etc. This goes all the way back to our earliest days when things used to go on with the canal system and plank roads.

The state of NY specifically because of it's eastern border was in a position to hamstring commerce from New England states and did so. There are plenty of other examples but the fact is you cannot have a situation where one state, let's say Illinois, says we don't like what people in Indiana believe politically and so if any Hoosier wants to travel through Illinois they have to pay us $100 first. By law the states/municipalities are restrained from interfering with interstate commerce that travels through their jurisdiction and also by law they can only pass fees, taxes in certain instances and they cannot come up with a byzantine scheme of laws that have the effect of prohibition of passage. That was all tried in the early days and shot down because you end up with each little jurisdiction being out of whack with the next. Movement of commerce requires a certain amount of uniformity so goods and services can flow.

In the case of someone traveling for an abortion in another state/jurisdiction the person is traveling to purchase a service provided in that other state/jurisdiction. Commerce. Imagine what it would be like if Wisconsin passed a law saying it's residents can't travel through any border town with Illinois to buy a car in Illinois. So then Illinois retaliates and says no Illinois resident can travel through their border towns to go buy cheese in Wisconsin. It could be never ending. That's why the commerce aspect is so important to this matter. So if a certain type of commerce/service is legal in one jurisdiction a state/municipality may not say "It's not legal here and you can't go there." That proposed travel ban obviously would also apply to anybody living in Amarillo. What the council is proposing is to imprison their own citizens with respect to leaving to take part in legal commerce/services in another jurisdiction. Rockford, Illinois for example cannot restrict it's citizens leaving to vacation in Nevada and use the brothels just because they are illegal in Illinois.

Attilatheblond

(8,880 posts)
7. Unconstitutional doesn't count in Texas
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 10:53 AM
Jul 2024

Well, except in regards to any sane gun safety laws, I reckon. They're all in favor of 'unconstitutional' if anybody tries to put any limit on any firearms.

Women should find work, homes, lives in other states. I know, not possible for all, but a girl can dream: Leave 'em with no sammwiches and no nookie until they sober up there.

Moostache

(11,179 posts)
17. With the current disreputable gang of thieves and villains on SCOTUS, 'constitutional' is a fluid term. (n/t)
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 11:32 AM
Jul 2024

SupportSanity

(1,582 posts)
8. Didn't they try this before? Or was it another Texas city?
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 10:58 AM
Jul 2024

Guards at checkpoints at the city limits "Can I see your papers, please?"

They should wear Nazi uniforms.

Grins

(9,459 posts)
9. Don't these "Christian" eff-twitts have something better to do?
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 11:04 AM
Jul 2024

Wasting their time on shit like this?

ck4829

(37,761 posts)
10. People in the past writing about the 21st Century: We're gonna have flying cars and day trips to the moon
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 11:16 AM
Jul 2024

21st Century when it happens: No driving through this road on your way to get an abortion

liberalgunwilltravel

(1,213 posts)
13. Even more important then!
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 11:23 AM
Jul 2024

Flying cars will be even more important then! Sorry for trying to bring some humor to a terribly dark time.

AllaN01Bear

(29,497 posts)
23. am still waiting for one that folds into a briefcase when u reach your destination after landing
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 12:14 PM
Jul 2024

liberalgunwilltravel

(1,213 posts)
12. Incredible
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 11:22 AM
Jul 2024

The incredible lightness of stupidity. And the incredible burden the stupid people have laid upon us.

Marthe48

(23,175 posts)
15. This is nuts
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 11:28 AM
Jul 2024

Such intense scrutiny directed at other people's lives. The people behind this are like kids aiming a magnifying glass on an ant. Deliberately cruel and destructive.

LastDemocratInSC

(4,242 posts)
30. Magnifying glass and ants.
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 01:07 PM
Jul 2024

I was fully aware of the practice because my brothers and their friends were considerably older than me. Our daughter wasn't interested in barbaric behavior so I didn't worry about her. But when it came to her 2 sons I made certain to never to mention anything about it to them. And, to my knowledge they never abused the little creatures with solar power experiments.

Moostache

(11,179 posts)
16. Time for a convoy through Texas...
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 11:31 AM
Jul 2024

Let's bring so much traffic through Armarillo that they would have to stop transportation just to inspect every vehicle coming through...run it in waves and keep at it as long as it takes to grind them to a complete stand still.

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes fascists.

3825-87867

(1,939 posts)
18. The Thought Police have arrived!
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 11:36 AM
Jul 2024

If a woman, possibly republican, is driving to OK to visit friends and is simply pregnant and wanted to be, what then? Do the new "Red Shirts" test her and do they REALLY know if she's telling them the truth about WANTING to have a baby? Can they detain her until they no longer THINK she's going for an abortion? COuld they lock her up until delivery? Or if they decide she's going for an abortion, do they remand her to Texass Authorities for incarceration and re-education?



ArkansasDemocrat1

(3,213 posts)
21. Yep. I used to visit Texas for tourism, conventions and concerts. Not anymore. Texas is dead to me. Fuck Texas.
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 11:56 AM
Jul 2024

If you gotta drive thru it, the panhandle is short enough that you can fill up in Tucumcari and refill over the border in Oklahoma. Pack a meal. Don't give them a dime of our filthy socialist money. They don't want it anyway as per the picture.

?v=1529517644&w=1600&h=900

Prof. Toru Tanaka

(2,926 posts)
31. I believe l-40 in the Northern Panhandle.covers about 170 miles
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 01:12 PM
Jul 2024

so yes, one could avoid stopping anywhere until reaching New Mexico or Oklahoma.

I’ve traveled cross country on I-40 a few times over the years and the only thing of interest to me in Amarillo was the Big Texan Steakhouse. I didn’t try to eat the 72 ounce steak; I just had a steak sandwich for lunch. It was also (hopefully) the only time I ever encounter a rattlesnake up close as they had one on display in a large glass case. This was over 20 years ago so I don’t know if they have one today.

With the political climate in Texas these days, this progressive with the Bernie Sanders bumper sticker would be quite happy to blissfully sail through the Northern Panhandle at the posted speed limit without stopping and giving the Lone Braincell State any of my money.

While I like George Strait’s music, the only thing “Amarillo by Morning” means to me is Albuquerque or Oklahoma City by noon

.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
20. Freedom to travel is in the Constitution, but it entrusts enforcement to the states. Tough luck, Texans. . . . nt
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 11:54 AM
Jul 2024

Vinca

(53,994 posts)
24. Idiots. What do they plan to do? Stop all cars with women and administer pregnancy tests?
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 12:19 PM
Jul 2024

jmowreader

(53,194 posts)
25. "Feel-good" but totally unenforceable law
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 12:29 PM
Jul 2024

As to the second part, where they ban abortion pills, I can just imagine...Karen walks into a police officer station with a sandwich bag.

"Officer Obie, there's a serious situation here that demands your complete attention, and I insist on an arrest. I broke into my commie liberal neighbor's house because I know she's fixin' to abort her pregnancy and took these two abortion pills, and I want you to arrest her right now and throw her in jail until she delivers her innocent baby which is to be immediately taken away and given to a loving Republican family."

"Ma'am...this one here's a Pez and that one's a Tic Tac. You say you broke into her house? Yeah, we can definitely do an arrest for you."

Freethinker65

(11,203 posts)
26. Got stuff stolen out of our car in Amarillo. Never ever passing through again!
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 12:32 PM
Jul 2024

But, how TF would they ever know if you passed by to/from getting legal healthcare?

Response to Freethinker65 (Reply #26)

Prof. Toru Tanaka

(2,926 posts)
32. I forgot to mention in my earlier post
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 01:29 PM
Jul 2024

that the world’s largest cross (195 ft. tall) is along the eastbound side of I-40 in Texas.

I guess it’s the God Squad’s way of letting travelers know they’ve got their eye on you even if you can’t see them.

The nearest town to the cross (I am not kidding here) is named Groom.

ArkansasDemocrat1

(3,213 posts)
34. The future is Three Words
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 01:44 PM
Jul 2024

Paintball Drone Artwork. Imagine drones which can switch colours. Might be fun if I ever found a reason to do it

Dave Bowman

(7,162 posts)
42. It would be interesting if people started boycotting corporations/organizations who are doing business in that town.
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 05:40 PM
Jul 2024

BumRushDaShow

(169,761 posts)
43. IIRC, Amarillo is blue
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 06:04 PM
Jul 2024

and they were able to block that crap in their City Council. And that is why this latest effort came to fruition to get around the city's block and force the issue onto the ballot. I would expect the ballot question will lose anyway but the cost to the city for dealing with this RW nonsense, could have been used for things more beneficial for the city.

 

Zoomie1986

(1,213 posts)
47. LOL Amarillo. Blue. Pull the other one
Mon Aug 5, 2024, 04:25 PM
Aug 2024

Amarillo sits across two counties. These are a sample of the results in 2020:

President of the United States

- DONALD J. TRUMP/MICHAEL R. PENCE (REP)
Potter County: 68.35% - 22,732 votes
Randall County: 78.54% - 50,597 votes

- JOSEPH R. BIDEN/KAMALA D. HARRIS (DEM)
Potter County: 29.67% - 9,867 votes
Randall County: 19.79% - 12,750 votes

United States Senator

- JOHN CORNYN (REP)
Potter County: 69.08% - 22,593 votes
Randall County: 79.48% - 50,926 votes

- MARY "MJ" HEGAR (DEM)
Potter County: 27.89% - 9,120 votes
Randall County: 18.05% - 11,567 votes

United States Representative for District 13

- RONNY JACKSON (REP)
Potter County: 68.44% - 22,366 votes
Randall County: 78.76% - 50,326 votes

- GUS TRUJILLO (DEM)
Potter County: 29.09% - 9,506 votes
Randall County: 18.99% - 12,133 votes

State Representative for District 87 (Potter County)
- Four Price (REP): 100% - 44,257 votes

State Representative for District 86 (Randall County)
- John Smithee (REP): 100% - 67,767 votes

https://www.amarillo.com/story/news/2020/11/03/2020-general-election-results/6150540002/

The Panhandle may actually have more racists and meaner ones than even East Texas. Which is saying something, since East Texas is pretty much Western Mississippi.

https://www.gainesville.com/story/news/2005/11/20/author-uncovers-a-tale-of-treachery/31467019007/

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Texas city to vote on ban...