Texas city to vote on banning patients from traveling through it for abortion
Source: The Guardian
Fri 19 Jul 2024 09.00 EDT
A city nestled in the northern tip of Texas, which was at the heart of a major US supreme court case over abortion rights this year, has found itself at the forefront of the abortion wars once again.
Come November, residents of Amarillo, Texas, will vote on an ordinance that would declare Amarillo a sanctuary city for the unborn and ban people from helping patients travel through Amarillo to access abortions what the ordinance calls abortion trafficking. It would also ban people from possessing or distributing abortion pills within Amarillo city limits.
Over the last several months, a string of Texas localities have passed similar ordinances. Amarillos city council spent months arguing over whether to pass its own sanctuary city ordinance, but in June, the council officially rejected it. However, while the ordinance languished before the council, a separate group gathered enough signatures for the ordinance to appear on Amarillos November ballot.
Although the city council is still deliberating the language to describe the ordinance on the ballot, activists in the city are already gearing up to campaign against it. We are ready, said Lindsay London, an activist with the Amarillo Reproductive Freedom Alliance. Travel bans harm communities. They harm the privacy of medical relationships. They do not help our communities to be strong and safe and supported.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/19/texas-abortion-travel-ban
pfitz59
(12,704 posts)Pregnancy test drive throughs at the city limits? Beyond absurd..
BumRushDaShow
(169,761 posts)when you had to have "traveling papers".
BigDemVoter
(4,700 posts)"Internal Passports"?
Warpy
(114,615 posts)but they'll soon find out they have no jurisdiction over any US highway that runs through the area.
Setting up roadblocks on state roads will be as popular as cancer.
It's just feel good crap to protect the fee-fees of panicky mediocre men.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,752 posts)carrying any woman or women believed to be of childbearing years. No way this will be abused. Also, a great opportunity for the usual crop of bad cops to demand bribes or extort sex from women.
Zilli
(286 posts)So, I picture every car traveling on the roads of any of these cities, being stopped and every woman being subjected to a roadside GYN exam and just to be clearer maybe incarceration until all of the lab work and pregenacy testing is completed...... amirite?
the new amerikkkan way.
DBoon
(24,988 posts)Midnight Writer
(25,410 posts)TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)Just ask Brett Kavanaugh.
"In a concurring opinion last month, Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh said the Constitution did not allow states to stop women from traveling to get abortions."
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/11/us/politics/the-right-to-travel-in-a-post-roe-world.html
moniss
(9,056 posts)decisions the court has made over the many years. If you allowed this to happen you could end up with cities blocking travel for any reason they wanted to. Imagine a city saying we don't want people with brown hair or are Democrats or who are renters rather than homeowners.
NutmegYankee
(16,478 posts)And the Right to Travel is an un-enumerated right under the 9th Amendment, so per the SCOTUS decision on abortion, it doesn't exist.
moniss
(9,056 posts)anything it wants when it wants the analysis of whether it would violate precedent is just a thing on it's face. Like anything in the legal realm if nobody is going to comply or uphold it will lose meaning other than being factually correct. As far as the right to travel goes this particular activity also involves commerce as opposed to simply being "moving from one location to another". The commerce component is very important because there is also lots of case law regarding states and municipalities trying to hamstring other jurisdictions/people/businesses with prohibitions, taxes, fees etc. This goes all the way back to our earliest days when things used to go on with the canal system and plank roads.
The state of NY specifically because of it's eastern border was in a position to hamstring commerce from New England states and did so. There are plenty of other examples but the fact is you cannot have a situation where one state, let's say Illinois, says we don't like what people in Indiana believe politically and so if any Hoosier wants to travel through Illinois they have to pay us $100 first. By law the states/municipalities are restrained from interfering with interstate commerce that travels through their jurisdiction and also by law they can only pass fees, taxes in certain instances and they cannot come up with a byzantine scheme of laws that have the effect of prohibition of passage. That was all tried in the early days and shot down because you end up with each little jurisdiction being out of whack with the next. Movement of commerce requires a certain amount of uniformity so goods and services can flow.
In the case of someone traveling for an abortion in another state/jurisdiction the person is traveling to purchase a service provided in that other state/jurisdiction. Commerce. Imagine what it would be like if Wisconsin passed a law saying it's residents can't travel through any border town with Illinois to buy a car in Illinois. So then Illinois retaliates and says no Illinois resident can travel through their border towns to go buy cheese in Wisconsin. It could be never ending. That's why the commerce aspect is so important to this matter. So if a certain type of commerce/service is legal in one jurisdiction a state/municipality may not say "It's not legal here and you can't go there." That proposed travel ban obviously would also apply to anybody living in Amarillo. What the council is proposing is to imprison their own citizens with respect to leaving to take part in legal commerce/services in another jurisdiction. Rockford, Illinois for example cannot restrict it's citizens leaving to vacation in Nevada and use the brothels just because they are illegal in Illinois.
Attilatheblond
(8,880 posts)Well, except in regards to any sane gun safety laws, I reckon. They're all in favor of 'unconstitutional' if anybody tries to put any limit on any firearms.
Women should find work, homes, lives in other states. I know, not possible for all, but a girl can dream: Leave 'em with no sammwiches and no nookie until they sober up there.
Moostache
(11,179 posts)SupportSanity
(1,582 posts)Guards at checkpoints at the city limits "Can I see your papers, please?"
They should wear Nazi uniforms.
Grins
(9,459 posts)Wasting their time on shit like this?
ck4829
(37,761 posts)21st Century when it happens: No driving through this road on your way to get an abortion
liberalgunwilltravel
(1,213 posts)Flying cars will be even more important then! Sorry for trying to bring some humor to a terribly dark time.
AllaN01Bear
(29,497 posts)
liberalgunwilltravel
(1,213 posts)The incredible lightness of stupidity. And the incredible burden the stupid people have laid upon us.
Marthe48
(23,175 posts)Such intense scrutiny directed at other people's lives. The people behind this are like kids aiming a magnifying glass on an ant. Deliberately cruel and destructive.
LastDemocratInSC
(4,242 posts)I was fully aware of the practice because my brothers and their friends were considerably older than me. Our daughter wasn't interested in barbaric behavior so I didn't worry about her. But when it came to her 2 sons I made certain to never to mention anything about it to them. And, to my knowledge they never abused the little creatures with solar power experiments.
Marthe48
(23,175 posts)I have never shared the idea with my grand kids.
Moostache
(11,179 posts)Let's bring so much traffic through Armarillo that they would have to stop transportation just to inspect every vehicle coming through...run it in waves and keep at it as long as it takes to grind them to a complete stand still.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes fascists.
3825-87867
(1,939 posts)If a woman, possibly republican, is driving to OK to visit friends and is simply pregnant and wanted to be, what then? Do the new "Red Shirts" test her and do they REALLY know if she's telling them the truth about WANTING to have a baby? Can they detain her until they no longer THINK she's going for an abortion? COuld they lock her up until delivery? Or if they decide she's going for an abortion, do they remand her to Texass Authorities for incarceration and re-education?
LeftInTX
(34,297 posts)ArkansasDemocrat1
(3,213 posts)If you gotta drive thru it, the panhandle is short enough that you can fill up in Tucumcari and refill over the border in Oklahoma. Pack a meal. Don't give them a dime of our filthy socialist money. They don't want it anyway as per the picture.
?v=1529517644&w=1600&h=900
Prof. Toru Tanaka
(2,926 posts)so yes, one could avoid stopping anywhere until reaching New Mexico or Oklahoma.
Ive traveled cross country on I-40 a few times over the years and the only thing of interest to me in Amarillo was the Big Texan Steakhouse. I didnt try to eat the 72 ounce steak; I just had a steak sandwich for lunch. It was also (hopefully) the only time I ever encounter a rattlesnake up close as they had one on display in a large glass case. This was over 20 years ago so I dont know if they have one today.
With the political climate in Texas these days, this progressive with the Bernie Sanders bumper sticker would be quite happy to blissfully sail through the Northern Panhandle at the posted speed limit without stopping and giving the Lone Braincell State any of my money.
While I like George Straits music, the only thing Amarillo by Morning means to me is Albuquerque or Oklahoma City by noon
.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)sakabatou
(46,149 posts)Vinca
(53,994 posts)jmowreader
(53,194 posts)As to the second part, where they ban abortion pills, I can just imagine...Karen walks into a police officer station with a sandwich bag.
"Officer Obie, there's a serious situation here that demands your complete attention, and I insist on an arrest. I broke into my commie liberal neighbor's house because I know she's fixin' to abort her pregnancy and took these two abortion pills, and I want you to arrest her right now and throw her in jail until she delivers her innocent baby which is to be immediately taken away and given to a loving Republican family."
"Ma'am...this one here's a Pez and that one's a Tic Tac. You say you broke into her house? Yeah, we can definitely do an arrest for you."
Freethinker65
(11,203 posts)But, how TF would they ever know if you passed by to/from getting legal healthcare?
Response to Freethinker65 (Reply #26)
ArkansasDemocrat1 This message was self-deleted by its author.
SpankMe
(3,720 posts)gay texan
(3,218 posts)Prof. Toru Tanaka
(2,926 posts)that the worlds largest cross (195 ft. tall) is along the eastbound side of I-40 in Texas.
I guess its the God Squads way of letting travelers know theyve got their eye on you even if you cant see them.
The nearest town to the cross (I am not kidding here) is named Groom.
ArkansasDemocrat1
(3,213 posts)Paintball Drone Artwork. Imagine drones which can switch colours. Might be fun if I ever found a reason to do it
Magoo48
(6,721 posts)Scalded Nun
(1,691 posts)Talitha
(7,988 posts)Dave Bowman
(7,162 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,761 posts)and they were able to block that crap in their City Council. And that is why this latest effort came to fruition to get around the city's block and force the issue onto the ballot. I would expect the ballot question will lose anyway but the cost to the city for dealing with this RW nonsense, could have been used for things more beneficial for the city.
Zoomie1986
(1,213 posts)Amarillo sits across two counties. These are a sample of the results in 2020:
President of the United States
- DONALD J. TRUMP/MICHAEL R. PENCE (REP)
Potter County: 68.35% - 22,732 votes
Randall County: 78.54% - 50,597 votes
- JOSEPH R. BIDEN/KAMALA D. HARRIS (DEM)
Potter County: 29.67% - 9,867 votes
Randall County: 19.79% - 12,750 votes
United States Senator
- JOHN CORNYN (REP)
Potter County: 69.08% - 22,593 votes
Randall County: 79.48% - 50,926 votes
- MARY "MJ" HEGAR (DEM)
Potter County: 27.89% - 9,120 votes
Randall County: 18.05% - 11,567 votes
United States Representative for District 13
- RONNY JACKSON (REP)
Potter County: 68.44% - 22,366 votes
Randall County: 78.76% - 50,326 votes
- GUS TRUJILLO (DEM)
Potter County: 29.09% - 9,506 votes
Randall County: 18.99% - 12,133 votes
State Representative for District 87 (Potter County)
- Four Price (REP): 100% - 44,257 votes
State Representative for District 86 (Randall County)
- John Smithee (REP): 100% - 67,767 votes
https://www.amarillo.com/story/news/2020/11/03/2020-general-election-results/6150540002/
The Panhandle may actually have more racists and meaner ones than even East Texas. Which is saying something, since East Texas is pretty much Western Mississippi.
https://www.gainesville.com/story/news/2005/11/20/author-uncovers-a-tale-of-treachery/31467019007/
ck4829
(37,761 posts)mcar
(46,058 posts)Idiots.
Mysterian
(6,486 posts)They want the USA to be exactly like Iran.