California governor vetoes bill requiring speeding alerts in new cars
Source: Associated Press
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill Saturday that would have required new cars to beep at drivers if they exceed the speed limit.
California would have become the first to require such systems for all new cars, trucks and buses sold in the state starting in 2030. The bill, aimed at reducing traffic deaths, would have mandated that vehicles beep at drivers when they exceed the speed limit by at least 10 mph (16kph).
The European Union has passed similar legislation to encourage drivers to slow down. Californias proposal would have provided exceptions for emergency vehicles, motorcycles and motorized scooters.
In explaining his veto, Newsom said federal law already dictates vehicle safety standards and adding California-specific requirements would create a patchwork of regulations.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/we-need-a-national-divorce-rep-marjorie-taylor-greene-calls-for-republican-states-to-secede-from-the-union/ar-AA17Islf?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=5c8edc94cdd3439b89c18122dc0b6ea3
moniss
(9,056 posts)on the Riviera back in the early '60's. I don't know if it was an option or standard but the Riviera was pretty loaded already. I don't know if any other cars had it.
patphil
(9,068 posts)You could set it wherever you wanted, and it would beep if you exceeded the set speed. It was pretty annoying, so it usually was set at about 100 mph.
It was essentially worthless.
moniss
(9,056 posts)when I reflect back because we ran around on bias ply tires usually half wore out or worse doing 80mph on a regular basis on roads that would be considered 3rd tier today. But I will say we sure had a more comfortable ride while we were speeding along.
JoseBalow
(9,489 posts)3Hotdogs
(15,368 posts)Highway speed limit is 65. Average speed is 75. Yeah, ya get the random Ford Crown Vic, with the invisible driver behind the wheel, going 52 in the left lane with the left turn blinker on. But that is unusual.
Ya know when you're speeding. So what would be the point of the buzzer?
Beartracks
(14,593 posts)But turn the radio on, and you're good to go, go, go!
Yeah, it does seem like it wouldn't produce the desired result. I wonder if it has done so in Europe?
================
NowsTheTime
(1,314 posts)petronius
(26,696 posts)at which it beeped.
GoneOffShore
(18,021 posts)The settings can be the exact limit, 5%, 10%, or no warning at all.
And the GPS is more accurate than the speedometer in your car.
Old Crank
(7,078 posts)That I have rented in Europe knows the speed limit, even in construction zones. Plus a display on the dash tells you the base speed limits when you cross a boarder.
Jk23
(455 posts)I do confess those school zones tend to throw it off. It can't tell if we're in the middle of a holiday or not.
Old Crank
(7,078 posts)And speed limits to keep cars from speeding.
All cruise control type devices should never allow setting over the speed limit.
Polybius
(21,902 posts)Imagine driving on a bridge and it starts too collapse in your rearview mirror, driving a woman in labor to the hospital, or whatever other emergency that may occur.
Old Crank
(7,078 posts)But the emergency use by regular drivers is not used as often as drivers speeding and justifying their criminality.
Polybius
(21,902 posts)For example, if the speed limit is 55, what would the car's maximum be able to do? 55? 60? 65?
Old Crank
(7,078 posts)Why would you have a grace speed?
The reason for speed limits is safety.
MichMan
(17,151 posts)Old Crank
(7,078 posts)MichMan
(17,151 posts)DiamondShark
(1,167 posts)sarisataka
(22,695 posts)Or had to rush a woman in labor to the hospital when speeding down the road was a better option than 911?
Now compare those extremely rare events to how many injuries/deaths are related to speeding... (NTHSA says about 1/3 of all fatalities and injuries involve speeding)
Polybius
(21,902 posts)Thankfully, saner heads would prevail. Extreme left legislation is almost as bas as extreme right legislation.
Jk23
(455 posts)And let the car drive itself. I mean usually the speed limits pretty low on these roads.
The driver Assist Technology really has made it easier and more pleasant to drive the car for long distances.
alarimer
(17,146 posts)Especially in cities.
We don't need more nanny nonsense.
radicalleft
(576 posts)Bet you are fun at parties...
4lbs
(7,395 posts)I wonder if this beeping may be confused with that.
Some drivers may be speeding down the highway, hear a beep, and think to themselves: "Wait, I'm going forward, not backward."
Also, sometimes speed limits change, so... unless it is tied to some sort of GPS and such, it might not work as intended. CA freeways used to have speed limits of 55 mph, now they are 65 mph, and in some places as high as 75 mph.
Also, it is 25 mph in most residential streets, but 35 mph, in most of the state and country. Also, 35 mph near schools, unless kids are walking, then it drops down to 25 mph (you know those 25 mph in a 'school zone' when children are present). Sometimes, you have to STOP at at school crosswalk, so the speed needs to be zero. How is all that going to be handled?
Another safety device that took decades to get right was the seat belt.
Seat belts were first widely used in cars in the 1950s, but it took another 30 years for the "kinks" and logistics to be fully worked out. Then they became 'mandatory' everywhere in the 1990s after some places made them compulsory in the 1980s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seat_belt
Subsequently, in 1966, Congress passed the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, requiring all automobiles to comply with certain safety standards.
The first compulsory seat belt law was put in place in 1970, in the state of Victoria, Australia, requiring their use by drivers and front-seat passengers. This legislation was enacted after trialing Hemco seat belts, designed by Desmond Hemphill (19262001), in the front seats of police vehicles, lowering the incidence of officer injury and death. Mandatory seat belt laws in the United States began to be introduced in the 1980s and faced opposition, with some consumers going to court to challenge the laws. Some cut seat belts out of their cars.
Some drivers may see the beeping as more of annoyance and ignore it. They may even try to 'disable' the beeping. Until insurance companies 'refuse' to pay if a car beeps or registers a high speed before an accident
Oopsie Daisy
(6,670 posts)* but it doesn't continue to nag me. It's just a "Ding! Pay attention!" chime. I like it, it's helpful.
kimbutgar
(27,248 posts)I go. I was driving down highway 5 recently and didnt realize I was going 90 mph but the car kept reminding me and I slowed down. The top speed is 70 mph in some areas on this highway.
republianmushroom
(22,326 posts)Sanity prevailed here, this time.
ecstatic
(35,075 posts)I regret signing up for monitoring with my insurance company. Constantly monitoring speed and having to slow down (against the flow of traffic) is a huge, dangerous distraction. In my opinion, it's always better to go with the flow of traffic.
I have been trying to get my Garmin to warn me when I'm over the limit. Then I remember I live in Houston where everybody seems to think the posted speed limits are "suggestions" and not anything legal.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)I've never heard of needing a seperate device to tell what speed I'm going. It's right there on the dashboard.
marble falls
(71,932 posts)AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)Rules to live by.
FakeNoose
(41,634 posts)Even though I live in an urban area, where excessive speeds almost never occur. I also spend time in the suburbs where speeding might occur occasionally. But this country isn't made up of urban and suburban areas, we're mostly rural. Look on a map of the United States, and the vast majority west of Philadelphia, and east of Sacramento, is wide-open space. Our speeding laws are for congested metro areas, not wide-open roads.
Drivers need to demonstrate an understanding of how to operate their vehicle and how to obey traffic laws. That's what happens when they take their state's driver license test. The vehicle doesn't take the test - it's up to each driver to pass.
maxsolomon
(38,729 posts)Where most arterials are limited to 25 mph. Excessive speeds REGULARLY occur.
25 mph is so slow that I sometimes set my cruise control at 33 mph so I don't go 15 mph or more over. And I get honked at and passed!
FakeNoose
(41,634 posts)Accidents and pedestrian incidents happen regularly. How would a nanny-beeper on the dashboard prevent that?
maxsolomon
(38,729 posts)It doesn't help that the Seattle DOT has turned the streets into a maze of BRT and bicycle lanes. Yesterday I honked at a gal starting to drive her car up a separated 2-way bike lane on a 1-way arterial. She ignored me and continued on her merry way.
CelticCrow
(78 posts)Imagine speed traps setup along major highways and the police yanking people out of their cars and beating speeders with their batons on the side of the road as an example to all other drivers. I'm sure it will reduce speeding deaths...
maxsolomon
(38,729 posts)New cars already show you the speed limit. We know we're speeding - even those of us with cars from olden times.
0 to 10 mph > the limit is NORMAL. For decades. State troopers don't even care. They care about >10 mph.
Polybius
(21,902 posts)Just look at all of the veto's that Gavin has done, and he's far from a conservative. Check this one out:
Gavin Newsom vetoes bill to help Black families reclaim land for being 'impossible to implement'
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)People suddenly become very defensive that their unsafe actions are safe because...