Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(69,888 posts)
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 09:46 AM Nov 2024

Judges deny requests to block DOJ from monitoring polls

Source: The Hill

Court Battles
Judges deny requests to block DOJ from monitoring polls

by Ella Lee - 11/05/24 8:31 AM ET

Federal judges denied two states’ requests to bar the Justice Department (DOJ) from dispatching lawyers to monitor adherence to federal voting rights laws on Election Day.

Both Missouri and Texas asked federal courts to keep DOJ lawyers away from their polls. Missouri’s attorney general and secretary of state said any monitoring would “displace state election authorities,” and Texas’s attorney general contended that “Texas law alone determines who can monitor voting in Texas.”

{snip}

Read more: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4972091-judge-wont-block-doj-election-poll-monitors/



Hat tip, Joe.My.God.

Judges: Texas And Missouri Can’t Ban DOJ Monitors
November 5, 2024

https://www.joemygod.com/2024/11/judges-texas-and-missouri-cant-ban-doj-monitors/
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judges deny requests to block DOJ from monitoring polls (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2024 OP
Tells you that Running Hawley and Cancun Crux were scared EOM JT45242 Nov 2024 #1
Go Kunce and Allred Clouds Passing Nov 2024 #19
Woot! BumRushDaShow Nov 2024 #2
Emergency Motion to Quash Monitoring from DOJ to the 6 assholes at the US SC.................. Lovie777 Nov 2024 #3
Then that's where I would go, gab13by13 Nov 2024 #4
In Arkansas, a spokesperson for Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders told ABC News that the office will not permit DOJ LiberalArkie Nov 2024 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author ArkansasDemocrat1 Nov 2024 #13
I personally think that Biden should pull an Eisenhower LiberalArkie Nov 2024 #16
please explain for those of us who might not know the history.... FirstLight Nov 2024 #25
Aw, you kids... dpibel Nov 2024 #26
And if memory serves me correctly Eisenhower raised Faubus NG with the 101st Airborne LiberalArkie Nov 2024 #36
Back when Republicans supported rule of law dpibel Nov 2024 #37
In the south the Democrats were the bad guys (Conservatives) and the Republicans were the Liberals like Win LiberalArkie Nov 2024 #38
Look up "Little Rock Central High" and our first Faubus LiberalArkie Nov 2024 #35
The DOJ does not intend to "improperly intimidate or unduly influence Arkansas voters" maxsolomon Nov 2024 #27
DeSantis also said this obamanut2012 Nov 2024 #32
How are Trumpublicans going to cheat..... SergeStorms Nov 2024 #40
Dubke's statement is redundant, at best Seinan Sensei Nov 2024 #33
I especially hope they have DOJ monitors in Houston since Republicans kicked out the Democratic elections officials. Lonestarblue Nov 2024 #6
According to Reuters, yes. DOJ's poll monitors will be beyond the 100 foot line, not inside. summer_in_TX Nov 2024 #29
"...monitoring would displace state election authorities," Grins Nov 2024 #7
Texas AG... GB_RN Nov 2024 #8
The goddamned supreme court gutted the VRA. CousinIT Nov 2024 #9
Yes, and roberts has his hands all over that garbage. JohnSJ Nov 2024 #12
And he and two other "just us es" gave W the victory, defending him. GreenWave Nov 2024 #30
Just like these states are ignoring the law, the DOJ needs to ignore the illegal rulings of the SC6 Clouds Passing Nov 2024 #20
This is what I'm thinking, too. BComplex Nov 2024 #31
That these bums, (racist assholes), would even want to block DOJ monitors tells you they are up to no good. JohnSJ Nov 2024 #10
Better send protection for DOJ monitors -- 70sEraVet Nov 2024 #11
WTF?? onetexan Nov 2024 #14
Andrew Bailey is such a shit bag. nt Gore1FL Nov 2024 #15
Always remember DownriverDem Nov 2024 #17
This isn't much of a victory. One suit was settled by agreement (TX); one relied on a previous settlement (St. Louis) Ramsey Barner Nov 2024 #18
What's the saying? If you've got nothing to hide...? Beartracks Nov 2024 #21
Suck on it MAGAs Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2024 #22
Just looking for fascists, don't be alarmed. Nt BootinUp Nov 2024 #23
Great! Go suck an egg maga...you're done. Madam President will be taking the stage for an acceptance speech PortTack Nov 2024 #24
I'm glad the decision to uphold the integrity of the voting system was made swiftly. Martin68 Nov 2024 #28
I voted Linda ladeewolf Nov 2024 #34
However, it does appear the DOJ has agreed to keep the monitors outside the polling stations!? LauraInLA Nov 2024 #39

LiberalArkie

(19,820 posts)
5. In Arkansas, a spokesperson for Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders told ABC News that the office will not permit DOJ
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 09:51 AM
Nov 2024

"Gov. Sanders will not permit the Department of Justice to improperly intimidate or unduly influence Arkansas voters which would be a violation of state law," spokesperson Sam Dubke said.

And in Missouri, where Republicans banned federal monitors in 2022, a spokesperson for Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft said the secretary will "again reject any push by the DOJ to interfere in Missouri elections."

https://abcnews.go.com/US/gop-led-states-federal-poll-monitors-voting-locations/story?id=115356555#:~:text=In%20Arkansas%2C%20a%20spokesperson%20for%20Republican%20Gov.%20Sarah,not%20permit%20DOJ%20poll%20monitors%20in%20the%20state.

Response to LiberalArkie (Reply #5)

FirstLight

(15,771 posts)
25. please explain for those of us who might not know the history....
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 12:17 PM
Nov 2024

I'm a little younger (Gen X) and don't know what this means?

dpibel

(3,955 posts)
26. Aw, you kids...
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 12:22 PM
Nov 2024
Orval Eugene Faubus (/ˈfɔːbəs/ FAW-bəs; January 7, 1910 – December 14, 1994) was an American politician who served as the 36th Governor of Arkansas from 1955 to 1967, as a member of the Democratic Party. In 1957, he refused to comply with a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1954 case Brown v. Board of Education, and ordered the Arkansas National Guard to prevent black students from attending Little Rock Central High School. This event became known as the Little Rock Crisis. He was elected to six two-year terms as governor.

LiberalArkie

(19,820 posts)
36. And if memory serves me correctly Eisenhower raised Faubus NG with the 101st Airborne
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 01:08 PM
Nov 2024

Woodrow Wilson Mann, the mayor of Little Rock, asked President Eisenhower to send federal troops to enforce integration and protect the nine students. On September 24, Eisenhower invoked the Insurrection Act of 1807 to enable troops to perform domestic law enforcement. The president ordered the 101st Airborne Division of the United States Army to Little Rock—initially without its black soldiers at the request of the Department of Justice—and federalized the entire 10,000-member Arkansas National Guard, taking it out of Faubus's control.[

dpibel

(3,955 posts)
37. Back when Republicans supported rule of law
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 01:11 PM
Nov 2024

At least the president did.

Them was the days.

LiberalArkie

(19,820 posts)
38. In the south the Democrats were the bad guys (Conservatives) and the Republicans were the Liberals like Win
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 01:17 PM
Nov 2024

Win Rockefeller. A great man. Defeated Faubus and started Arkansas down a liberal path including Dale Bumpers, Rob Riley, David Pryor, Joe Percell and a little known back water guy named Clinton, then Jim Guy Tucker. Followed by the death of Arkansas Liberal era the original Huckster.

maxsolomon

(38,749 posts)
27. The DOJ does not intend to "improperly intimidate or unduly influence Arkansas voters"
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 12:22 PM
Nov 2024

so they've got nothing to worry about.

MONITORING is not intimidating or influencing, FFS.

SergeStorms

(20,599 posts)
40. How are Trumpublicans going to cheat.....
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 05:42 PM
Nov 2024

when there are DOJ monitors in place? The southern Trumpublicans can't have any of that!

Lonestarblue

(13,487 posts)
6. I especially hope they have DOJ monitors in Houston since Republicans kicked out the Democratic elections officials.
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 09:55 AM
Nov 2024

The legislature passed a partisan law that applies only to Harris County allowing them to administer the election. Republican cheating by refusing to allow people to vote or cancelling their mail ballots for minor reasons will be rampant to protect Cruz.

summer_in_TX

(4,169 posts)
29. According to Reuters, yes. DOJ's poll monitors will be beyond the 100 foot line, not inside.
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 12:25 PM
Nov 2024

They can easily note problems with access for people with disabilities and any efforts to intimidate and suppress the vote from outside. Plus those who are prevented from voting can report any problems directly to them.

Harris County was one of the original 7 counties on the list – as is my county, Hays.



Grins

(9,460 posts)
7. "...monitoring would displace state election authorities,"
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 09:55 AM
Nov 2024

Evidence? Point to any state where that has happened since the Voting Rights Act?

GB_RN

(3,561 posts)
8. Texas AG...
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 10:19 AM
Nov 2024

Ken Fuckin’ Paxton. What a corrupt douchebag. If there’s a lawsuit against the federal government when Democrats are in control, 99.99% of the time, this asshole is behind it.

Why isn’t he in jail, yet? Under indictment for about a decade (for securities fraud, IIRC).

Paxton can fuck off. When he gets there, he can keep right on fucking off.

CousinIT

(12,545 posts)
9. The goddamned supreme court gutted the VRA.
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 10:21 AM
Nov 2024

The part that allowed DoJ monitors to monitor federal elections in states. Now, if the states refuse to allow it, DoJ has to get a court order.

This is part of the VRA USSC gutted.

Clouds Passing

(7,947 posts)
20. Just like these states are ignoring the law, the DOJ needs to ignore the illegal rulings of the SC6
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 12:00 PM
Nov 2024

BComplex

(9,917 posts)
31. This is what I'm thinking, too.
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 12:28 PM
Nov 2024

The rw supremes are ignoring stare decisis, so they should be ignored.

 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
10. That these bums, (racist assholes), would even want to block DOJ monitors tells you they are up to no good.
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 10:48 AM
Nov 2024

Very relieved that the Judges didn't let them get away with this.


DownriverDem

(7,014 posts)
17. Always remember
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 11:46 AM
Nov 2024

repubs will do anything to win. That means lie, cheat and use the courts. repubs are mostly white, They are just full of hate. (I'm white)

Ramsey Barner

(669 posts)
18. This isn't much of a victory. One suit was settled by agreement (TX); one relied on a previous settlement (St. Louis)
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 11:56 AM
Nov 2024

It looks like states can still exclude federal election monitors unless there's an agreement or a court order.

PortTack

(35,820 posts)
24. Great! Go suck an egg maga...you're done. Madam President will be taking the stage for an acceptance speech
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 12:16 PM
Nov 2024

Tonight!

Martin68

(27,758 posts)
28. I'm glad the decision to uphold the integrity of the voting system was made swiftly.
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 12:23 PM
Nov 2024

Rogues states cannot be allowed to derail our democracy.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judges deny requests to b...