Trump admin tells agencies to start firing DEI staffers
Source: Axios
11 hours ago
The Trump administration is directing the heads of federal agencies to "take action to terminate" staffers of DEI offices, according to a memo from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management issued Friday night.
Why it matters: The White House purge of diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility (DEIA) programs and workers, begun Monday, is happening at lightning speed.
State of play: "[E]ach agency, department, or commission head shall take action to terminate, to the maximum extent allowed by law, all DEI, DEIA, and 'environmental justice' offices and positions within sixty days," the memo reads.
The memo updates a directive sent earlier this week that told agencies to submit written plans for executing a "reduction-in-force," i.e., layoffs, no later than January 31. But the new memo says agencies should start issuing these reduction-in-force notices now. It's not clear how many DEI staffers there are within the federal government, which employs millions of workers. In many cases it may not be possible to simply fire these workers; processes for doing so will vary.
Zoom in: The memo Friday night follows a directive issued earlier this week that ordered department and agency heads to close DEI offices some of which are tasked with addressing accessibility issues for disabled people.
Agencies were ordered to put staff on paid leave, as well as take down all DEI websites, social accounts, and "outward facing media." They were also told to withdraw any plans in the equity and inclusion space and cancel all trainings and contracts. The directive included an email template that called on government employees to snitch on colleagues that were continuing these practices.
Read more: https://www.axios.com/2025/01/25/trump-dei-workers-fired
Irish_Dem
(81,189 posts)Only white christian males will be employed.
Mike 03
(18,690 posts)This is sure to increase the levels of already sky-high tension, anxiety, distrust and paranoia.
mahatmakanejeeves
(69,760 posts)electric_blue68
(26,856 posts)lanlady
(7,229 posts)--I hope the people about to get fired without cause are able to join together and sue the pants off Orange Anti-Christ.
bronxiteforever
(11,212 posts)bucolic_frolic
(55,094 posts)the world survives post-Trump.
COL Mustard
(8,199 posts)I could retire any time I choose, but would rather not have to do four more years (it does sound like a prison term dunnit?)....
Lovie777
(22,947 posts)what say you.
Lovie777
(22,947 posts)rainin
(3,246 posts)kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)you believe this action is unconstitutional?
Prairie_Seagull
(4,682 posts)Short or long?
M80 or ...
purr-rat beauty
(1,248 posts)Its ironic that this "meritocracy" trump is trying to push is eclipsed by the sheer incompetence of his appointees.
HarryM
(464 posts)We see signs saying, Blacks need not apply?
OldBaldy1701E
(11,114 posts)I keep coming across stories about people and businesses who are basically implementing that policy. Oh, they don't call it that, of course. But, the end result is the same.
electric_blue68
(26,856 posts)twodogsbarking
(18,751 posts)Initech
(108,719 posts)Fuck Trump, to the hottest circle of hell.
OhioBack2Blue
(102 posts)Are we just rolling over?
The ADA and 504 are laws. Accommodations for students, veterans and others are not educational awareness raising exercises. They are necessary for people to be able to gain employment, live, and participate in society.
Again, where are the lawsuits?
BumRushDaShow
(169,537 posts)so there will be things going on "behind the scenes" that neither we nor the media would know about unless it directly impacts us in some way (i.e., through a family member, coworker, friend, neighbor, etc).
Also from the OP -
There are only a few circumstances where someone in the federal government can be "terminated" on the spot if they are not in one of the "appointee" Schedules (and even then, there is a whole convoluted process required), and this is not one of them.
COL Mustard
(8,199 posts)Followed by testing positive on a drug test.
BumRushDaShow
(169,537 posts)at least one who made threats against a supervisor and harassed/stalked them after being put on Administrative leave. He was never "all there" but it eventually came to a head and he had to go (and he even continued the stalking after he was terminated).
The most common infractions (although the eventual punishment varied) was misuse of a government credit card and misuse of a government vehicle. Those government credit cards are just too addictive for some and they seem to ignore the fact that the Administrative Officer gets a copy of the bills for every credit card in that office.
COL Mustard
(8,199 posts)At how many people use them at strip clubs and other places like that. Just dumb.
BumRushDaShow
(169,537 posts)was for lodging (and rail or airfare if I had to travel that way when not using a GOV or POV). I didn't even use it for meals or incidentals or gas for the car or tolls or anything else (I used my own $$$ and just put in for reimbursement).
And when we first got those GSA cards, they were Diner's Club ones that very few places took.
They later contracted with American Express and when that contract was up, they moved to JPMorgan (as a Mastercard I think).
And I remember the days BEFORE the government credit card when they would give us the cash as a cash advance upfront!
FBaggins
(28,705 posts)Far too many were created by executive orders from the Obama and/or Biden administrations.
There will certainly be lawsuits - and they may preserve some salaries - but there's no way to preserve the department if its existence relies on the consent of the guy in the room without corners.
Dan
(5,164 posts)By eliminating DEI Offices and Staff - who do you complain to?
Even if youre in the private sector - you either submit an EEO complaint to your HR and they refer those complaints to their DEI departments, if they still have one. Then if your case has merit they can then recommend you go to the local government or federal government. But those offices no longer exist.
So, yes they are getting rid of the minorities now - but the White men arent seeing the Forest because of the Trees. So, let me help you - once DEI Offices and staff are gone, then as they deploy more AI & automation, they are coming for you too. And to whom are you going to complain?
White women - who generally aligned with White men and benefitted from EEO programs will also be targeted. Sexual discrimination etc., theres no Offices or Staff to complain too.
Also applies to the Disabled, Age Discrimination, etc., lots of people benefitted from the security of EEO.
IMHO.
Hugin
(37,840 posts)The IGs are ultimately where whistle blower cases end up. It would appear the Retrumplicans are trying to barricade against the tsunami of litigation and investigation which occurred during the first Imposition. Like Vindman and thousands of others we never even heard about.
COL Mustard
(8,199 posts)But they can't just be let go, right? Don't they have rights to another position? This could trickle down through the ranks and end up letting some poor slob go who had nothing to do with any of this. Am I right, or way off base here?
BumRushDaShow
(169,537 posts)they got to about 60% of their own agency's positions before Biden came in and torpedoed the whole thing. However when they had done it, I think they included a 60 day "review period" before anything would go into effect and that gave enough time for Biden to repeal the classification EO.
But that effort was just for OPM. Most other agencies had never gotten that far and some hadn't even gotten started... and as it is, reclassifications (and I had been through a couple during my career before retiring) takes time because they have to write up job descriptions and duties, etc. and then that has to get translated into Performance Review standards, etc.
Hugin
(37,840 posts)They think their dream is a so-called Right-to-Work (notice the double entendre there RIGHT-to-work? I did immediately. They think they are clever.) scheme.
Even though this has been going on since at least the Civil War, I was there for one of the first attempts of the modern era. Shepherded by Gingrich.
What thwarted it that time was in order to reclassify a position, it had to be re-advertised for at least 60 days. Meaning that anyone on the street who met the qualifications (or not) could apply. This was true of all of the positions that they were attempting to purge including those of their cronies, who were part of the scheme. As they were generally the would be supervisors of these reclassified departments and directorates.
That attempt did eliminate over 90% of the WG (blue collar type slots) Where I was they went from over a hundred down to one. Who was soon gone.
Over the years, this horseshit has cost the taxpayers billions of dollars in needless churning and lost productivity. Simply because someone is a bigot and cant stand the thought of working with or under a female or other minority.
BumRushDaShow
(169,537 posts)and remember the initial efforts from Gingrich in the '90s with GPRA and other idiocy. But that was the last time (outside of all the base closures) when there were large numbers of RIFs going on. But the RIFs happened AFTER the budgets were decided not BEFORE.
I think this may have also been when they got rid of (for the most part - at least in my agency) the GM classifications for managers and they ended up either under GS or SES.
And agree about the WGs - we still had a few but only a few. I think most of that type of job ended up being contracted out, which is something the current GOP doesn't want to talk about - their initial assault on Civil Service was to contract it all out to private contractors and people don't realize that probably half of those who get paid by the federal government as government employees, ARE contractors. The biggest example being contracting out much of the IT work, leaving a few technician-type staff, SMEs and COTRs, with little or no "in house" programming, etc.
Hugin
(37,840 posts)U.S. Army Materiel Command, also known as, A Million Civilians. When the RiF happened, I was on my way out the gate because he had literally four more days time-in-service. He felt really bad about that. Luckily, (or maybe not) I got pulled back in because I had a dual classification that afforded me some additional earned time-in-service. I somehow made it through four months working without pay. I did end up under an entirely different command, though. Which in those days was a really big deal and I had to re-start everything in my tenure from square one. I existed in HR purgatory for the next four or five years. I cringed every time I had mail with the Army letterhead.
The AMC guy lasted for six months and was gone.
BumRushDaShow
(169,537 posts)here in Philly, with their functions eventually getting broken up and parceled out during the alignment period, across other entities.
Man... I know that had to be a nightmare for you.
BumRushDaShow
(169,537 posts)Javaman
(65,699 posts)think that's an accident?