Bloomberg dismisses NRA's power as 'overrated'
Source: Politico
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Sunday that it was a "myth" that the National Rifle Association could destroy political careers.
"One of the things I decided to do in this last election was to support some candidates that were running against those that had great records with the NRA. Where the NRA was putting their money into one side, I decided to put my money into the other side," Bloomberg said on NBC's "Meet the Press."
"We won four out of seven," he said. "And we won with a small amount of money. There is this myth that the NRA is so powerful."
Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/politico-live/2012/12/bloomberg-nras-power-is-overrated-152086.html
yellerpup
(12,263 posts)It all comes down to money and Bloomberg has enough to fight back. It is inexcusable that we have so many in Congress who are bought and paid for by the arms and ammunitions makers. It's the money in politics that makes the NRA so powerful. The NRA writes the gun laws for this country. It isn't as if our representatives think about, study, and prepare bills to benefit the NRA because they are worried about what might happen if people aren't allowed to have guns in bars, and churches, and daycare. Was any politician EVER elected by putting this initiative forward? No, all they have to do is sign whatever the master puts before them and take the check. Bloomberg is all about making money work.
Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)But thank you for stating it so much better.
valerief
(53,235 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Obama is probably not part of the 1% but he's rich. Words should matter. Information matters. Money? Only when there is a direct link between it and an issue. In this case, I don't see one.
valerief
(53,235 posts)what does PRESIDENT Obama have to do with this?
axetogrind
(118 posts)Why would anyone trust this 1% after what he did to the Occupy movement in NY. His NYPD were brutal and out of control and that was at his orders.
Just shameful.
underpants
(196,349 posts)Thank you Mayor Bloomberg
Danmel
(5,767 posts)But this is not one of them. He has consistently taken on the gun lobby. At least he has the cojones to do that.
FreeBC
(403 posts)They can keep saying that, whether it's about the Tea Partyiers, Anti-abortionists, Evangelical Christians, whatever... it doesn't make it true.
bucolic_frolic
(54,998 posts)Mayor Bloomberg must have old-style, upper crust Republican progressive
roots. Nelson Rockefeller, Ribicoff. Or maybe it's just NYC breeding.
I don't agree on him with everything, but at least he will act in the long
term best interest on issues.
The Republican Party could do worse than to turn to him if they ever
try to regain the mainstream.
Blasphemer
(3,620 posts)His party-switch was political maneuvering.
silhouete2
(80 posts)The NRA isn't all powerful as it used to be. They inflate their importance--kind of like Norquist does. The only ones afraid of the NRA are the politicians who have taken their money and now have to kowtow to them.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)the same. We need Dorothy and that little dog of hers
hughee99
(16,113 posts)I'm sure they don't have nearly as much power in New York City as they do in other regions.
VPStoltz
(1,295 posts)4.3 million!!!!!!!!!!!
60+ million voted for PrezO TWICE.
Who should have the pull?
Those people in Washington are beholden to US, not a little blip of an organization like the NRA.
yellerpup
(12,263 posts)The lobby for the armament and ammunition manufacturers should be separate from the membership. Not all the membership wholeheartedly supports all the NRA's lobbying efforts. Yes, our representatives have been voting for the lobby that funds their campaign and provides other personal benefits.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)We the People are stronger than a single Industry. Also, remember how powerful was the Tobacco Industry? And look at them now.
malibea
(179 posts)You're absolutely correct. It is typical of bully behavior. All it takes is ONE PERSON or THING to initiate action against them and they foldup like a cheap suit! I speak from experience from high school-and I am now over 66 years old. The highschool "bully" wanted to be my best friend after I confronted and stood up to her. Nothing has changed; my grand daughter went through the same thing recently because she was small and cute. The would-be high school bully is now her protector and best friend and my grand daughter can't get rid of her!
It is time that the NRA are confronted and this, hopefully, is that time.
Why did it take the death of these innocent "babies" to arouse the resentment and resistance that is apparent now against the NRA? These cowards, the NRA, show nothing but cowardice and FEAR! Again, typical bully behavior.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)Sgent
(5,858 posts)because a pro gun control New Yorker has any idea what a southern democrat like Mary Landreu will go through in two years. If she votes for anything opposed by the NRA, she loses.