Trump administration orders federal agencies to provide lists of underperforming employees
Source: AP
Updated 2:28 PM EST, February 7, 2025
President Donald Trump’s administration has ordered all federal departments and agencies to provide lists of employees who are underperforming, as it seeks to shrink the workforce and awaits a court ruling related to its deferred resignation offers.
A memo sent by the Office of Personnel Management on Thursday directs the agencies to submit names of every employee who has received less than a “fully successful” performance rating in the past three years and to note whether the workers have been on performance plans.
The memo, which was viewed by The Associated Press, also emphasized that the agencies report any obstacles to making sure they have “the ability to swiftly terminate poor performing employees who cannot or will not improve.”
The memo seeks the employee’s name, job title, pay plan and other details, as well as whether that employee is “under or successfully completed a performance improvement plan within the last 12 months.” The office also is asking if an agency has proposed or issued a decision in such cases, and whether any action is being appealed or challenged, as well as any outcome.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/trump-federal-employees-lists-underperforming-layoffs-80755cea03a93c2b6d00e21fb1716e39
= new reply since forum marked as read
I know that different agencies do their performance appraisals differently and I even remember when GPRA was "the thing" in the '90s, when my agency tried what some other agencies were using at the time - "pass/fail". We eventually went back to grading on different levels but I wouldn't be surprised if there are agencies that do "pass/fail" appraisals.
This just shows the idiocy of 45's people not even considering how varied these performance assessments are done from agency to agency. 
And it kept giving them piles of MAGAts, Trump appointees, capped off by Trump and Musk.
Oh, I would pay a pretty penny to see that list.
in some cases, as a result of Union negotiations. We ended up ranging from "pass/fail" to up to 5 performance levels. The scoring would determine if someone got a cash award (if there was an awards budget) or a QSI (Quality Step Increase).
It was head-spinning at times. But then the one thing that the 45 admin is neglecting to realize/understand, is that when you have a poor-performing employee, they usually get put on a PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) and I have found that most times, you do get improvement after that because you get them focused. There tends to be a tiny few who are just unmanageable.
SUMMARY
Federal Workforce Restructuring Act of 1994 - Amends Federal civil service law to eliminate various restrictions on employee training.
(Sec. 3) Authorizes temporary "buy-out" programs for encouraging selected groups of employees in the executive and judicial branches (except employees of the Department of Defense, Central Intelligence Agency, or the General Accounting Office) to separate from Government service, generally by April 1, 1995, by offering them lump-sum payments in order to avoid or minimize reductions in force (RIFs).
Requires: (1) such payments (the lesser of $25,000 or the amount of the employee's severance pay) to be paid from amounts available for the employee's pay, and, generally, to be fully repaid if the employee rejoins the Federal Government within five years of separation; (2) the elimination of one full-time equivalent position for each one vacated by reason of a lump-sum payment; (3) that there be no increase in service contract procurement by reason of this Act except where it is financially advantageous to the Federal Government; and (4) participating Federal agencies to make specified contributions to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund based on the final rate of basic pay of each employee who retires early and receives the lump-sum payment for FY 1994 and 1995, as well as on the number of agency employees subject to the Civil Service or Federal Employees' Retirement System for FY 1995 through 1998.
Authorizes the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to establish a program for judicial employees consistent with this Act.
(Sec. 5) Sets annual limitations on the total number of full-time equivalent executive agency positions each year through FY 1999, subject to waiver under certain conditions, such as war or national emergency. Suspends further agency hiring in cases of noncompliance with such limitations.
(Sec. 6) Requires the Office of Personnel Management to submit annual reports on such "buy-out" programs to the Congress.
(Sec. 7) Provides for severance payments for certain employees under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration who worked in Yellow Creek, Mississippi, and whose separation resulted from the termination of the Advanced Solid Rocket Motor Program.
(Sec. 8) Amends Federal civil service law and the Central Intelligence Agency Voluntary Separation Pay Act regarding optional forgiveness of the lump-sum repayment obligations of bought-out employees reemployed in positions for which there is exceptional difficulty in recruiting qualified employees.
(Sec. 9) Revises the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), with changes providing all separating TSP participants with the same options for withdrawal.
(Sec. 10) Amends the Alaska Railroad Transfer Act of 1982 to: (1) allow application to employees of a State-owned railroad under such Act of the buyout provisions of this Act; and (2) reduce the amount of service time required for such employees who remained covered under the Civil Service Retirement System to carry both Federal health and life insurance benefits into retirement.
By The Associated Press
March 31, 1994
President Clinton signed legislation today intended to help reduce the Federal work force by about 273,000 people over the next five years by offering buyouts of up to $25,000 to employees who leave Government. "After all the rhetoric about cutting the size and cost of Government, our Administration has done the hard work and made the tough choices," Mr. Clinton said in a statement released in Coronado, where he is vacationing.
The legislation aims to help cut the full-time Federal work force to 1.88 million by the end of the fiscal year 1999 in a more compassionate and cheaper way than involuntary layoffs. The buyouts are expected to reduce the work force by nearly 12 percent over five years.
Under the bill, a Federal employee who has completed 12 months of continuous service could take severance pay or a lump sum of $25,000, whichever is less, on leaving the Government.
The employee buyout plan gained wide bipartisan support after it became evident that the reduction goals would not be reached through attrition or involuntary dismissals. Congressional investigators concluded that involuntary dismissals would disproportionately affect minorities and women.
(snip)
Another article on that -
LAW RAISES DOWNSIZING MANDATE TO 272,900 GOVERNMENT JOBS
March 30, 1994
By Stephen Barr
President Clinton signed legislation yesterday designed to speed the downsizing of the government by offering buyouts of up to $25,000 to federal employees who resign or retire early. "With the buyout authority granted by this legislation, agencies can target employees in unnecessary high-level jobs and maximize savings," Clinton said in a statement.
The governmentwide buyout authority will allow each federal department and agency to decide when to offer the cash incentives and where they should be offered within the organizations. The authority expires on March 31, 1995.
Office of Personnel Management Director James B. King has set up an office at OPM to provide information to employees and agencies. "Buyouts build on successful private-sector experience, and they make good management sense," King said.
The legislation also mandates that the government reduce the federal work force by 272,900 employees between 1993 and 1999, eliminating about 20,000 more jobs than was recommended by Vice President Gore's National Performance Review. "We welcome this action," said Office of Management and Budget Director Leon E. Panetta. He said the mandatory work force reduction "will bring the size of the bureaucracy below 2 million for the first time since 1966 and to its lowest level since 1950."
(snip)
This is the level of detail that has NOT been done with any of the crap going on right now. What they are doing is basically attempting to implement the "Unitary Executive" school of thought and interestingly enough, I saw that ABC News had an article on that today -
ByAlexandra Hutzler
February 7, 2025, 11:57 AM
As President Donald Trump works at a breakneck speed to implement his second-term agenda , including wholesale firings and sweeping policy changes, he and his advisers assert his power over the executive branch is complete and can't be questioned. Still, his flurry of executive actions and orders spark a critical question: Does he have the power he claims to have? Multiple court challenges are underway trying to stop his attempts to end birthright citizenship and temporarily freeze federal loans and grants.
More legal pushback will unfold amid Trump's unprecedented purge of the executive workforce and reshaping of what Congress set up as independent agencies, the dismantling of which is largely being carried out by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency.
Trump quickly fired 17 independent watchdogs and the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Longtime Democratic Federal Election Commissioner Ellen Weintraub said Trump sent a letter removing her from the commission. His administration has directed all federal DEI staff be put on leave. The Justice Department fired more than a dozen of prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases. Millions of employees were offered buyouts, with tens of thousands of people accepting them.
His administration has touted the moves as long-overdue cutting of waste in favor of a merit-based system. His critics slam them as a radical restructuring of the federal government aimed at consolidating presidential power -- and placing loyalty to Trump over regulatory agency expertise designed to be insulated from political influence.
(snip)
This is the kind of shit that John Yoo promoted.
