Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NJCher

(43,165 posts)
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 06:45 PM Feb 2025

White House and Ukraine Close In on Deal For Mineral Rights

Source: Wall Street Journal

Agreement could help resolve tensions that flared up between Zelensky and Trump

snip

The U.S. and Ukraine are nearing a deal that would hand valuable mineral rights to the U.S., an agreement that the Trump administration has sought as compensation for military aid to fight off Russia's invasion, people familiar with the matter said.

Ukraine had refused to sign such a deal earlier this week, sparking a war of words between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and fears of a break in relations between Washington and Kyiv.

In an apparent nod to an impending deal, Zelensky said in a nightly video address Friday that teams of U.S. and Ukrainian negotiators were working on a draft agreement.

"This is an agreement that can strengthen our relations, and the key is to work out the details to ensure its effectiveness," he said. "I look forward to the outcome--a just result."

snip

Note: this story published at 5:36. Another one, for background, is posted below and was published at 5 p.m.
Stories are close together; obviously something is happening.

Read more: https://www.wsj.com/world/white-house-and-ukraine-close-in-on-deal-for-mineral-rights-e924c672?mod=latest_headlines



WSJ claiming this is an exclusive.
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House and Ukraine Close In on Deal For Mineral Rights (Original Post) NJCher Feb 2025 OP
And Russia? Lovie777 Feb 2025 #1
I will paraphrase the rest of the story NJCher Feb 2025 #5
No they are not. Ukraine is not so stupid as to comply with the Orange King NotHardly Feb 2025 #34
Mineral Rights bromeando Feb 2025 #2
That and fair market value as well as U.S. support to help them join NATO. cstanleytech Feb 2025 #4
where are you getting this? NJCher Feb 2025 #6
Providing they are getting fair market value and a further agreement to repel the Russian invaders I'm ok with it. cstanleytech Feb 2025 #3
A previous draft had clauses effectively giving the US control over who could make use of the resources, Emrys Feb 2025 #29
Does Ukraine recoup their lands? Lovie777 Feb 2025 #7
TSF"s words are meaningless. I will await bronxiteforever Feb 2025 #8
AGREE! Why would anybody trust these traitors? bluestarone Feb 2025 #10
The update to the story makes this very unclear bronxiteforever Feb 2025 #15
Here's from a story published by WSJ an hour ago, around 5 p.m. NJCher Feb 2025 #9
"The key is to work out the details." BeyondGeography Feb 2025 #11
ahhh NJCher Feb 2025 #12
Because ManBaby needs a win BeyondGeography Feb 2025 #16
He's still a loser no matter what he gets from Ukraine Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2025 #33
That timing is weird and concerning with a Putin bronxiteforever Feb 2025 #17
So contracts can be given to Trump connected people JI7 Feb 2025 #20
NATO and EU support.... Lovie777 Feb 2025 #13
First demands were worse than the Treaty of Versailles CNYHarris Feb 2025 #14
"I told you to investigate Biden. Now you have to pay." Marcuse Feb 2025 #18
update NJCher Feb 2025 #19
We've given a total of $69.2B in aid to Ukraine since 2014 William Seger Feb 2025 #21
This is a travesty. (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Feb 2025 #22
Blackmail is still blackmail............ turbinetree Feb 2025 #23
just checked for updates NJCher Feb 2025 #24
I know Ukraine is sick to death of this war, Bayard Feb 2025 #25
Interesting .... from the article: Diamond_Dog Feb 2025 #26
Have Ukraine admitted in NATO and then sign, if they must, but not until the ink is dry Deuxcents Feb 2025 #27
It would seem those rights would end if Russia were to take the country over. surfered Feb 2025 #28
If Trump walks away with Ukraine's resources, all that's going to do is embolden him. Karasu Feb 2025 #30
Bad Deal? FB47243 Feb 2025 #31
Missed your post and just posted the full NYT article here ... cliffside Feb 2025 #32
DON'T DO THIS ZELENSKY 4catsmom Feb 2025 #35
I hope they know whatever agreement dump gives them mdbl Feb 2025 #36
That's why they should agree to it and balk at it when it is convenient for Ukraine. Ray Bruns Feb 2025 #37

NJCher

(43,165 posts)
5. I will paraphrase the rest of the story
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 06:54 PM
Feb 2025

Ukraine was given the deal last week by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in Kyiv last week. They refused to sign at the time because they needed to study it and also wanted security guarantees. Ukrainians said they were only given a few hours to study it.

They're saying the exact terms could not be learned. Ukraine might sign it by Saturday, even though the proposal itself is not yet complete.

Trump's reaction today was: “I think they want it. They feel good about it.”

-----------

That's it for the story. I am checking a few things out about this and its relationship to the peace deal. I will post back if I find anything.

NJCher

(43,165 posts)
6. where are you getting this?
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 06:57 PM
Feb 2025

Because the first paragraph says: "compensation for military aid to fight off Russia’s invasion, people familiar with the matter said."

Doesn't sound to me like there would be any compensation, just cancellation of the debt.

cstanleytech

(28,471 posts)
3. Providing they are getting fair market value and a further agreement to repel the Russian invaders I'm ok with it.
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 06:50 PM
Feb 2025

Emrys

(9,100 posts)
29. A previous draft had clauses effectively giving the US control over who could make use of the resources,
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 10:47 PM
Feb 2025

basically for ever. I don't know whether that would be adjusted in a later draft, but it would make it far less than a good deal whatever the quid pro quo is. And the idea that Trump would grant "fair market value" when he thinks he holds all the cards in any deal would be a novelty. Trump still insists the US has given a lot more aid than it actually has, and claimed today that the EU's aid was in the form of loans, which is, predictably, a lie.

We don't even know the scope of the resources being haggled over, let alone any monetary value. I doubt very much that Trump knows anything about strategic minerals, other than his having been told by Lindsey Graham they could be quite lucrative.

Ukraine does have not insignificant amounts of strategic minerals under its territory, not to mention the territory Russia's tried to grab in the east, where some of the heaviest lodes are believed to be for some of the minerals. But the economic feasibility of extracting them is another matter. That could have been a lever to get Trump to make some effort to get Russia out of the east, but with his hoped-for relationship with Putin, he's probably seek to do a deal with them as well.

At the moment, I could see Zelensky weighing this all up saying "fuck it" and going for a deal, but it has to guarantee the Ukrainians something meaningful in terms of future security. What's that saying about "Fool me once ..."? One problem is, if the Trumpians win that concession, what more are they going to start asking for?

Meanwhile, it makes the Trump administration look unspeakably tawdry and moneygrubbing. Trump may not care, but it may come back and bite him and them in ass one day.

bronxiteforever

(11,212 posts)
8. TSF"s words are meaningless. I will await
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 07:01 PM
Feb 2025

the fine print and see what actions the US will take and will these be bargained away with Putin.. Putin is grabbing as much territory as possible in his latest offensive ( claiming the Russians took 4 more villages yesterday).

bluestarone

(22,179 posts)
10. AGREE! Why would anybody trust these traitors?
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 07:04 PM
Feb 2025

This will just give Ammo to the RETHUGS in our congress to speak out against Ukraine.

bronxiteforever

(11,212 posts)
15. The update to the story makes this very unclear
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 07:18 PM
Feb 2025

Which makes me more concerned that he will just sell out Ukraine.

NJCher

(43,165 posts)
9. Here's from a story published by WSJ an hour ago, around 5 p.m.
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 07:02 PM
Feb 2025

snip

Ukraine also has deposits of rare earths, essential in certain high-tech industries, including defense and renewable energy. While potentially plentiful, the reserves would require massive investment to develop, even in peacetime, and many are located in areas occupied by Russia.

Zelensky on Wednesday told reporters that the deal shown to him by Bessent had been “unclear,” apart from demanding 50% of a list of Ukrainian natural resources. The Ukrainian leader said he rejected that document but was ready to discuss a deal that also included U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine.

Zelensky said he was grateful for U.S. aid to Ukraine, which he put at around $100 billion in military and financial support. But he said Trump’s demand for $500 billion worth of minerals in return was excessive.

Still, he has said he is open to working on the proposal and striking a security-and-economic agreement.

snip

https://www.wsj.com/world/trump-ukraine-mineral-deal-sign-e2ff7d3f?mod=article_inline

NJCher

(43,165 posts)
12. ahhh
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 07:10 PM
Feb 2025

you may have something there.

Enormous pressure is being placed on Zelensky by the U.S. In two additional paragraphs at the 5:00 p.m. story, it was said that the U.S. pushed the paperwork at Zelensky and demanded he sign it.

So what you say makes sense and that Zelensky just needs to get the pressure off for a time.

Also, what I can't figure out is why is trump demanding a $500 billion when we have only spent $100 billion on their defense? And why is it so imperative that this be settled now? Would that be so trump can tell Putin he can transfer these assets to him, since he badly needs cash?

I don't really understand the way this mineral rights agreement has an impact on the peace talks.

BeyondGeography

(41,101 posts)
16. Because ManBaby needs a win
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 07:18 PM
Feb 2025

And to satiate his greed fetish.

The deal as proposed is an embarrassment to our country. These are terms you impose on a defeated aggressor, not a friendly ally who has been invaded. It should go nowhere in the end.

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(135,713 posts)
33. He's still a loser no matter what he gets from Ukraine
Sat Feb 22, 2025, 01:19 AM
Feb 2025

People at home are pissed off over the whole DOGE BS.

bronxiteforever

(11,212 posts)
17. That timing is weird and concerning with a Putin
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 07:20 PM
Feb 2025

I agree it looks as if Ukraine is buying time.

JI7

(93,616 posts)
20. So contracts can be given to Trump connected people
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 08:17 PM
Feb 2025

which most likely means Russian and Putin aligned businesses.

CNYHarris

(143 posts)
14. First demands were worse than the Treaty of Versailles
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 07:17 PM
Feb 2025

These were the first demands by Trump:

Marcuse

(9,010 posts)
18. "I told you to investigate Biden. Now you have to pay."
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 07:49 PM
Feb 2025
"You were always going to betray us to Putin anyway."

NJCher

(43,165 posts)
19. update
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 08:14 PM
Feb 2025

Story was updated at 6:36 with this:


snip

In an apparent nod to an impending deal, Zelensky said in a nightly video address Friday that teams of U.S. and Ukrainian negotiators were working on a draft agreement.

“This is an agreement that can strengthen our relations, and the key is to work out the details to ensure its effectiveness,” he said. “I look forward to the outcome—a just result.”

snip

William Seger

(12,443 posts)
21. We've given a total of $69.2B in aid to Ukraine since 2014
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 08:53 PM
Feb 2025

... and His MAGAsty was demanding $500B repayment while "negotiating" with Russia, without Ukraine or NATO, to end Putin's invasion by giving him everything he wanted — for now? I do believe the gaslighting must be getting to me; I must be going nuts or soon will.

turbinetree

(27,551 posts)
23. Blackmail is still blackmail............
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 09:20 PM
Feb 2025

and he still a 34 count traitor or fraud ...........Zelensky really should tell him to go pound sand lots of it.............

Bayard

(29,693 posts)
25. I know Ukraine is sick to death of this war,
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 10:01 PM
Feb 2025

But this would plainly be giving in to extortion, and encourage Russia to keep going. Don't do it, President Zelensky! There has to be another way.

Diamond_Dog

(40,578 posts)
26. Interesting .... from the article:
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 10:15 PM
Feb 2025

”Zelensky’s administration had itself floated the idea of Ukraine granting preferential access to its mineral resources last year, hoping that it would entice Trump to continue military support for Kyiv by offering the U.S. some economic benefit.”

Deuxcents

(26,915 posts)
27. Have Ukraine admitted in NATO and then sign, if they must, but not until the ink is dry
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 10:15 PM
Feb 2025

surfered

(13,465 posts)
28. It would seem those rights would end if Russia were to take the country over.
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 10:15 PM
Feb 2025

That would seem to mean Trump would defend the country against a Russian takeover.

Of course, Trump has lied once or twice before.

Europe must step up and do it now!

Karasu

(2,003 posts)
30. If Trump walks away with Ukraine's resources, all that's going to do is embolden him.
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 11:21 PM
Feb 2025

Last edited Sat Feb 22, 2025, 02:37 AM - Edit history (1)

The stupid fucking Greenland shit will become so much worse.

FB47243

(67 posts)
31. Bad Deal?
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 11:48 PM
Feb 2025

Perhaps not a bad deal. Fifty percent of the desired minerals are in occupied ukrain territory such as Crimea etc. this may not be a bad deal depends on how it’s structured. US gets mineral rights to that half and uS supplies needed military equipment to drive Putin completely out and ukrain gets territory back.

Ray Bruns

(6,362 posts)
37. That's why they should agree to it and balk at it when it is convenient for Ukraine.
Sat Feb 22, 2025, 05:37 PM
Feb 2025

Take a lesson fromt the Stinky playbook

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House and Ukraine C...