Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 01:32 PM Dec 2012

DOJ: No ‘Cyberstalking’ Charge For Paula Broadwell

Source: TPM



IGOR BOBIC 12:05 PM EST, TUESDAY DECEMBER 18, 2012

The U.S. Department of Justice has dropped its investigation into whether David Petraeus' mistress, Paula Broadwell, "cyberstalked" Jill Kelley, the AP reports:

Broadwell's lawyer, Robert Muse, gave The Associated Press a letter from U.S. Attorney Robert O'Neill that says no federal charges will be brought in Florida related to "alleged acts of cyberstalking."

A retired general, Petraeus resigned as CIA director in November after acknowledging the extramarital affair, which was exposed after Broadwell emailed Tampa socialite Jill Kelley, allegedly warning Kelley to stay away from Petraeus and Gen. John Allen, the U.S. commander in Afghanistan.

-30-

Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/doj-no-cyberstalking-charge-for-paula-broadwell

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DOJ: No ‘Cyberstalking’ Charge For Paula Broadwell (Original Post) DonViejo Dec 2012 OP
We have a DOJ ? Here, in the U.S. ? russspeakeasy Dec 2012 #1
Soooo the act that spawned the investigation that torpedoed the General wasn't a criminal act after AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #2
does not mean it was not criminal.... dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #4
Heh, good point. AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #5
Well, I for one am so glad that's settled... KansDem Dec 2012 #3

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
2. Soooo the act that spawned the investigation that torpedoed the General wasn't a criminal act after
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 01:53 PM
Dec 2012

all?

THAT is going to get some people to talking.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
4. does not mean it was not criminal....
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 02:33 PM
Dec 2012

just means DOJ does not pursue rich or high ranking or politically inconvenient criminals.

Light up a joint and see how fast DOJ will go after your ass.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
5. Heh, good point.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 02:41 PM
Dec 2012

Still, it's an outcome that can be spun pretty hard in a number of directions. Can't wait to see the snippets of Beck and the like, on the right sidebar here on DU, with the highlights of the nuttery spin machine.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
3. Well, I for one am so glad that's settled...
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 02:06 PM
Dec 2012

I was really worried there for awhile...
[p align="right"]

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»DOJ: No ‘Cyberstalking’ C...