Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,352 posts)
Sun Apr 6, 2025, 05:35 PM Apr 2025

Experts say White House's rehoming of student loan program will put borrowers at risk

Source: The Guardian

Sun 6 Apr 2025 06.00 EDT
Last modified on Sun 6 Apr 2025 14.27 EDT


The Trump administration’s rehoming of the federal student loan program is putting student borrowers at a higher risk of defaulting on their loans and may not save the government the money that it is claiming it will, experts say. After the president vowed to dismantle the education department and make student loans a part of the Small Business Administration, student financial aid groups suggest that borrowers could find themselves in hot water because the SBA does not have experience with such loans and is on track to lose almost half its staff.

The move to put student loan debt under the SBA umbrella also comes on the heels of recent changes to and reversals of borrower repayment plans – most notably the Saving on a Valuable Education (Save) Plan. Additionally, it’s arriving in tandem with rising costs of living around the US. “This is a recipe for millions of borrowers getting poor service and having no one to protect them,” said Michael Negron, who worked on student debt for the National Economic Council during the Biden administration.

Some in Washington previously expected Donald Trump to move the federal student aid office to the treasury department, as that was the Heritage Foundation’s recommendation in its conservative policy blueprint Project 2025, which has shaped much of the administration’s agenda.

But Trump said on 21 March that the management of student loans would instead shift to the SBA “immediately” – just one day after the White House press secretary said the education department would continue to oversee the program.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/06/student-loans-trump-small-business-association

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Experts say White House's rehoming of student loan program will put borrowers at risk (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 OP
Ah, yes, more chaos, confusion, and so much more evil sakabatou Apr 2025 #1
Like they care ... dweller Apr 2025 #2
Student Loans wyn borkins Apr 2025 #3
Everything he has done and continues to do is illegal BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 #4
Thank You wyn borkins Apr 2025 #5
Most welcome! BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 #6
What they will do is tuck enabling language into the budget or other critical legislative vehicle such that it will be Ford_Prefect Apr 2025 #13
"What they will do is tuck enabling language into the budget" BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 #14
I think you intended to reply to me ? dweller Apr 2025 #7
Apologies Offered wyn borkins Apr 2025 #8
No problem dweller Apr 2025 #9
Downloaded and Will (try to) Review it (all) :: Thank You (n/t) wyn borkins Apr 2025 #10
Part two is subscription only IbogaProject Apr 2025 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author wyn borkins Apr 2025 #12

dweller

(28,712 posts)
2. Like they care ...
Sun Apr 6, 2025, 06:25 PM
Apr 2025

Biden worked hard to help students with programs like SAVE , and working to find forgiveness for those trapped in long loan repayment fiascos , and was stymied at every stage .
Now the malignant idiot and Fascism2025 is supposed to be better

Students will default on their loans , after all they had contracts with the Education Department not the SBA .


✌🏻

wyn borkins

(1,375 posts)
3. Student Loans
Sun Apr 6, 2025, 06:44 PM
Apr 2025
"Students will default on their loans; after all, the students had contracts with the Department of Education, not with the Small Business Administration (SBA)".

Perhaps the legal minds here on DU might address this anomaly...

BumRushDaShow

(172,352 posts)
4. Everything he has done and continues to do is illegal
Sun Apr 6, 2025, 06:50 PM
Apr 2025

There are already several suits filed against the administration for this nonsense with the Dept. of Education. They keep thinking they can just move stuff around as if the federal government is "private industry" and we unfortunately have to deal with the slow pace of the courts to set the record straight to them.

(and as a note, IANAL but have had to take all kinds of government "law-related" courses during my federal career before I retired)

BumRushDaShow

(172,352 posts)
6. Most welcome!
Sun Apr 6, 2025, 07:23 PM
Apr 2025


The below was the law that created the "Department of Education", which was signed into law by President Jimmy Carter in 1979.


S.210 - An act to establish a Department of Education, and for other purposes.

(the functions associated with "education" previous to that law, were originally under "HEW" - the Department of "Health, Education, and Welfare" )

When I had started at my HHS agency in the mid '80s, there was still a lot of stuff (forms, letterheads, guidance documents, etc.) around that referenced the old "HEW".

Ford_Prefect

(8,667 posts)
13. What they will do is tuck enabling language into the budget or other critical legislative vehicle such that it will be
Mon Apr 7, 2025, 05:49 AM
Apr 2025

enabled under the cover of the issues that bill addresses. They may have already done in the massive budget package the House is teeing up to vote on.

BumRushDaShow

(172,352 posts)
14. "What they will do is tuck enabling language into the budget"
Mon Apr 7, 2025, 06:18 AM
Apr 2025

That's what the GOP finally woke up and began to consider doing. I.e., to back-authorize all the illegal usurpation of THEIR role. But it's not there yet, and as long as they are fussing and fighting over the budget framework (let alone any details), the opposition to what is happening (which has actually become more bipartisan) will continue to build.

The House GOP now has its full compliment, and even with that, cannot lose more than 3 members to whatever they decide on.

dweller

(28,712 posts)
7. I think you intended to reply to me ?
Sun Apr 6, 2025, 07:29 PM
Apr 2025

This article came out 3/21 … it’s quite a long read , and some here on DU said it was wrong . But it’s still under discussion at the substack where I read it .
https://www.thelongmemo.com/p/every-student-loan-is-now-forgiven?utm_source=multiple-personal-recommendations-email&utm_medium=email&triedRedirect=true


✌🏻

wyn borkins

(1,375 posts)
8. Apologies Offered
Sun Apr 6, 2025, 07:34 PM
Apr 2025

Yes, you are correct; I did indeed intend to respond to you directly...

IbogaProject

(6,076 posts)
11. Part two is subscription only
Sun Apr 6, 2025, 11:58 PM
Apr 2025

Part two's introduction says probably not. Then says you have to pay up to read anymore.

Response to IbogaProject (Reply #11)

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Experts say White House's...