Scott Brown backs assault gun ban
Source: Politico
Outgoing Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown has become the first GOP senator to endorse a renewed assault weapons ban.
What happened in Newtown where those children were subject to that level of violence is beyond my comprehension, Brown told the Springfield Republican on Wednesday. As a state legislator in Massachusetts I supported an assault weapons ban thinking other states would follow suit. But unfortunately, they have not and innocent people are being killed. As a result, I support a federal assault weapons ban, perhaps like the legislation we have in Massachusetts.
Previously, Brown had long opposed new federal restrictions on guns, arguing the issue should be left to the states. But Brown earned the endorsement of New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg in Novembers election in part by opposing legislation that wouldve allowed concealed weapon permit holders to carry guns across state lines.
Brown may also be preparing himself to run in a special election should Sen. John Kerry be named Secretary of State. Brown is perhaps the most likely GOP nominee in the special election, which would probably take place sometime this summer.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/scott-brown-backs-assault-gun-ban-85348.html
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)But trust me if this asshole gets elected he'll vote with the rest of the GOP
alp227
(33,359 posts)Unless he becomes an independent.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)and Brown isn't going to lose them by supporting gun control.
LaPera
(6,486 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)He won by appealing to the unenrolled (those registered to vote, but with no party affiliation). Supporting gun control won't hurt him in MA with the 11% and will help him with that group.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)Scotty the male-model / GOP 'escort' (willing to perform a variety of positions in exchange for votes).
canoeist52
(2,282 posts)nolabear
(43,850 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)In fact, I'd imagine Republicans would absolutely love to have an assault weapons ban pass soon.
1) It lets their few remaining moderates say "see, I voted for bipartisan gun control legislation"
2) It lets them rile up gun owners who know what it does and see it as a pointless culture war "fuck you" to them
3) It doesn't affect, for instance, the gun the shooter in Newtown used, so no actual access to firearms are lost
If I were a Republican I'd be all for this. If it goes down like in 1994, people (hell, even some legislators) will think that it's banning semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines (which is what is actually important if you're trying to stop mass shootings), gun makers will remove the bayonet lugs from their rifles and sell them legally (at sky-high prices to the rubes), and gun control as an issue will be dead for another two decades.
But we're not supposed to talk about that. Apparently demanding gun control that actually gets rid of the guns used in mass murders makes you a wild-eyed NRA loving gun nut.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)He won't have to vote on it.
Caeser67
(156 posts)YOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
BELIEEEEEEEVVVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEE
IIIITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!
bobclark86
(1,415 posts)just like I believe Mitt the Twit Romney signing an assault weapons ban and then getting an NRA endorsement against someone who has only talked about it...
chelsea0011
(10,245 posts)This guy is incapapble of taking a position until the s%#t hits the fan and a decision is made for him. He still hasn't had any opinion on the budget discussions. He wants to wait to see an actual bill before he decides anything. In other words he will stick his finger in the air and come down which ever way the popular wind is blowing. I'm hoping my home state Dems change the rule once again so the next appointment is to fill out the term with no special election.
meegbear
(25,438 posts)you're a pussy Brown. Glad you're gone.
beac
(9,992 posts)Enjoy your last days of mild relevance.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)If this jag-off gets back into the Senate, I'll be major pissed off.
Fearless
(18,458 posts)Rinse and repeat. He's posturing to run for Senate again.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)He knows it will never make it through the House.
Skittles
(172,895 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)He's getting ready to run for Kerry's seat when Kerry is confirmed as SOS. We know Brown will be voting yes for that.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.