Kari Lake Suggests Trump Should Defy Courts: I'd Rather 'Follow The Constitution Than a Judge Who's Got an Agenda'
Source: MEDIAite
Apr 27th, 2025, 2:43 pm
Kari Lake, the Trump administration Senior Advisor for the US Agency for Global Media, suggested Sunday that President Donald Trump should defy court orders he views as politically motivated.
Appearing on Fox News Sunday Morning Futures, Lake criticized federal judges who have issued rulings blocking Trumps executive actions on immigration, tariffs, and agency reforms.
She also accused the judiciary of attempting to subvert the will of the people through those rulings. Theyre completely out of control, Lake told host Maria Bartiromo. They are basically usurping the power of the president.
Judges have issued temporary injunctions on immigration enforcement policies, halted tariff measures, and blocked efforts to slash jobs and funding for federal agencies, including the US Agency for Global Media. Several of these disputes are expected to advance to the Supreme Court. Lake, who oversees media entities such as Voice of America and the Office of Cuba Broadcasting, said court rulings had delayed efforts to reshape her operation.
Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/tv/kari-lake-suggests-trump-should-defy-courts-id-rather-follow-the-constitution-than-a-judge-whos-got-an-agenda/
Lovie777
(23,261 posts)CurtEastPoint
(20,063 posts)DENVERPOPS
(13,003 posts)is STILL trying to get herself a place in Trump's CABAL.............
bluestarone
(22,325 posts)They will NOT listen to any judges orders folks. It's coming.
Mrsfiddlegirl
(51 posts)You just go ahead and do that girl. Can't wait to see you in that orange jumpsuit.
Jacson6
(2,081 posts)She has bachelor in communication degree and no training in the US laws & Constitution. She is just a well spoken person that reads a teleprompter on TV written by other people. IMHO.
dchill
(42,660 posts)...reading a weather report from a teleprompter.
AZJonnie
(3,810 posts)
Ellipsis
(9,469 posts)NoMoreRepugs
(12,168 posts)Traildogbob
(13,075 posts)Cleveland browns win more often. And are much smarter.
lonely bird
(2,984 posts)That is bad. I can speak as a Browns fan.
liberalgunwilltravel
(1,231 posts)Stupid witch needs a lesson.
Blue Dotty
(184 posts)none of you losers would be in office after Jan 6th, not to mention all the fake elector schemes.
erronis
(24,138 posts)Free for all! Those with the most AR-15s win!
twodogsbarking
(19,020 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(180,730 posts)
JohnnyRingo
(20,933 posts)Even though he's shopping judges in different aisles, they all agree.
patphil
(9,144 posts)They are the ones who interpret the laws of the land. They don't usurp the power of the president, they see to it that the president's power is limited by the rule of law.
Someone's out of control here, but it isn't the Judicial Branch.
struggle4progress
(126,458 posts)struggle4progress
(126,458 posts)Updated December 12, 20244:26 PM ET
By Rachel Treisman
David Folkenflik
https://www.npr.org/2024/12/12/nx-s1-5226920/voice-of-america-kari-lake-voa
struggle4progress
(126,458 posts)March 29, 202512:05 AM ET
David Folkenflik
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/04/09/kari-lake-voa-doge/
keroro gunsou
(2,306 posts)the rule of law is merely the product of activist judges? good to know, i'll try that defense if i am ever brought before a judge. i'll let y'all know how that goes...
jesus in the crackhouse, these people are bloody effing STUPID, with a capital dumb.
struggle4progress
(126,458 posts)March 29, 202512:05 AM ET
David Folkenflik
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/29/nx-s1-5343953/voice-of-america-trump-judge-lawsuit
electric_blue68
(27,014 posts)🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
DallasNE
(8,018 posts)Avoid making a fool of yourself. The Executive does not determine the rule of law. The Courts are there for that. Also, the Judicary does not subvert the will of the people. It is for the Congress to pass the laws that the people have asked for, not the Executive by penning Executive Orders. It is all right there in the Constitution. Just do as it demands. Right now you look like some kind of fool Lake. It is how the rule of law works. Get with it.
bucolic_frolic
(55,459 posts)ProudMNDemocrat
(20,959 posts)Damn, that woman is DUMB!!!
vapor2
(4,682 posts)Norrrm
(5,278 posts)Or is that..... different?
58Sunliner
(6,366 posts)Hassler
(4,934 posts)no_hypocrisy
(55,102 posts)Her premise falls apart.
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
LetMyPeopleVote This message was self-deleted by its author.
LetMyPeopleVote
(180,730 posts)
republianmushroom
(22,449 posts)Zambero
(10,015 posts)The Constitution enshrined separation of powers, establishing three separate but equal branches of government. Lake would categorically discard the Judicial branch. With an enabling Congress content to forego its oversight and legislative responsibilities, that enables a rogue imperial presidency ruling by decree. So much for the Constitution and representative democracy. Yet again, Lake's remarks reveal her to be a clueless idiot.