Supreme Court lets DOGE access sensitive Social Security Administration information
Last edited Fri Jun 6, 2025, 06:24 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: CBS News
Updated on: June 6, 2025 / 4:44 PM EDT
Washington The Supreme Court on Friday cleared the way for the White House's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, to access sensitive information kept by the Social Security Administration while legal proceedings move forward. In an unsigned order, the high court agreed to temporarily lift an injunction issued by a federal district court in Maryland that limited DOGE's access to agency systems of records containing the personal information of millions of Americans. Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.
"We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work," the Supreme Court said in its decision. The emergency appeal to the Supreme Court was the first to land before the high court that directly involved DOGE, the initiative previously led by Elon Musk that aims to shrink the size of the federal government.
DOGE's sweeping efforts have sparked numerous lawsuits. Plaintiffs have argued that the task force has violated federal privacy law governing the government's collection and use of Americans' information kept by agencies. Jackson, joined by Sotomayor, said it's not clear that it is in the public's interest for the Social Security Administration to give DOGE staff access to Americans' data before it's been established that they are entitled to it and said the Supreme Court's decision creates "grave privacy risks for millions."
"The court grants a stay permitting the government to give unfettered data access to DOGE regardless despite its failure to show any need or any interest in complying with existing privacy safeguards, and all before we know for sure whether federal law countenances such access," she wrote. "The court is thereby, unfortunately, suggesting that what would be an extraordinary request for everyone else is nothing more than an ordinary day on the docket for this Administration."
Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-doge-social-security-administration-information/
Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1063_6j37.pdf
SunSeeker
(58,374 posts)wnylib
(26,439 posts)elocs
(24,486 posts)LymphocyteLover
(10,134 posts)this fucking conservative SCOTUS is either clueless or evil
sinkingfeeling
(58,028 posts)FakeNoose
(42,375 posts)LymphocyteLover
(10,134 posts)FakeNoose
(42,375 posts)slightlv
(7,935 posts)chicoescuela
(3,195 posts)NewHendoLib
(61,905 posts)Baitball Blogger
(52,712 posts)Elon, care to pitch on?
Rebl2
(17,923 posts)elocs
(24,486 posts)IcyPeas
(25,779 posts)He.gets.whatever.he.wants.
He owns everybody. There is no red line. There is no last straw
He's a monster/mobster
And
Fuck the actual supreme court.
It isn't meant to be this way.
elocs
(24,486 posts)yellow dahlia
(6,446 posts)When it came across the Chyron, I started swearing up a storm. Fuck you SCOTUS! (Well actually - the traitorous six.)
And yes, I want to cry...for so many reasons.
dweller
(28,664 posts)Call off your goons
✌🏻
Irish_Dem
(82,281 posts)The US Congress and Courts are corrupt and work for the billionaires and our enemies.
They are part of the wrecking ball destroying our country.
elocs
(24,486 posts)WestMichRad
(3,388 posts)
have access to sensitive personnel data while courts decide whether or not they should be allowed to access these sensitive data.
Totally reasonable!
riversedge
(81,515 posts)IrishAfricanAmerican
(4,508 posts)Courts have overturned most of what they've attempted.
Puppyjive
(1,005 posts)They now have the keys to the kingdome. SS employees work very hard at keeping information private. I guess it's all out the door now. Getting access to health information is very concerning to me.
dickthegrouch
(4,648 posts)Supremely
Criminal
Republicans
Openly
Trashing
Universal
Moral
Standards
Deftly doesn't include the three liberal Justices who are doing their best to lay the groundwork for reversal of these atrocious decisions at some point in the future.
Pas-de-Calais
(10,295 posts)Dissenting opinions are the only sane individuals left on the highest? court!!
Truly with the votes allowing access are the first to be hacked the worst
Justice matters.
(10,054 posts)... while having a majority in the Senate ends up screwing the private data of millions upon millions of people.
Being 'timid' in order to appease fascists never worked.
annielion
(110 posts)The 6 conservatives on the supreme court are unforgivable traitorous thugs.
surfered
(14,234 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 6, 2025, 09:06 PM - Edit history (1)
LearnedHand
(5,590 posts)(Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) not HIPPA. But I totally agree with you. We need, and will never get, serious European-style data protection laws.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Insurance_Portability_and_Accountability_Act
surfered
(14,234 posts)surfered
(14,234 posts)dickthegrouch
(4,648 posts)Anyone (worldwide, in theory) storing data on more than 50,000 California residents is subject to the CPRA.
quakerboy
(14,905 posts)Trump continues to get what he wants. No laws, rules, or regulations have siginficantly stopped him so far.
Iamscrewed
(486 posts)Burn this administration down.
vapor2
(4,892 posts)Haru
(56 posts)Can we pass a law that requires congressional approval to allow anyone to access our records ??
yellow dahlia
(6,446 posts)He has been focusing on Social Security.
k_buddy762
(638 posts)que no?
travelingthrulife
(5,557 posts)Irish_Dem
(82,281 posts)The corruption is rampant.
Hotler
(13,747 posts)Picaro
(2,438 posts)Supreme in what sense? They now just issue decisions that have no basis in law or logic.
They should be thinking about what happens to them when this goes off the rails.
Violence is imminent. The signs are there.
People are getting pissed off.
Eric Princes 100,000 man army wont be big enough (reference to another post).
Deminpenn
(17,575 posts)Now that their leader is gone and also feuding with Trump, the DOGE plants in the various departments can be effectively ignored. Vought is nominally in charge, but he's tied up with recission now and will be fighting that fight for awhile.
Jared Moskowitz (D-Fl) was on the Weeknight on MSNBC recently and said that everyone (in Congress) knows DOGE is dead.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,703 posts)There are several in Congress who have commented on this, but far, far from enough. DOGE wasn't there to be oversight - they were there to blow a firehose of shit to distract from the primary goal - access to the data.
SCOTUS just told them to freely keep what they have already exported for "code review".
Evolve Dammit
(21,814 posts)travelingthrulife
(5,557 posts)Otherwise people might drag them out of their cushy chairs to face real justice.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,703 posts)And anyone who ever applied for SSI/disability can add their physical/mental health records to the employment, income, bank, etc ones.
Toothpaste doesn't go back in the tube.
Now we wait to see what they're going to do with it (and when).
lonely bird
(3,029 posts)This is a fourth amendment issue. On top of the actual fact that DOGE was not, is not and, hopefully, never will be an actual department of the federal government.
They just shat on the Constitution.
Pesky1
(87 posts)o Citizen's United
o President immune from prosecution
o Malicious outsiders given complete access to SS data
Take a look at the Enabling Act of 1933 in Germany.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Enabling-Act
Opened the door to abject misery...which you would think CJ Roberts would know about following his massive education.
yorkster
(3,949 posts)of the Supreme Scourge Six is safely tucked away somewhere....