Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,351 posts)
Tue Jul 29, 2025, 05:57 AM Jul 2025

"Billet" is irrelevant if Congress DESIGNATES that funding "for Salaries, Expenses, etc"

It's how the appropriations are worded in the legislation (I have had to take multiple "Appropriations Law" courses in order to support/approve direct-report procurements and contracts as a Supervisor and COTR). This is why I linked to what was done under Clinton - which shows what is needed to "authorize" a reprogramming of funds for such a purpose.

(ETA - some agencies were told they would have "buyouts", which again, are illegal absent authorizing legislation)

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»"Billet" is irrelevant if...