Bluesky Goes Dark in Mississippi Over Age Verification Law
Source: Wired
PEOPLE IN MISSISSIPPI can no longer use the social media platform Bluesky. The company announced Friday that it will be blocking all IP addresses within Mississippi for the foreseeable future in response to a recent US Supreme Court decision that allows the state to enforce strict age verification for social media platforms.
According to Bluesky, Mississippis approach to verification would fundamentally change how users access the site. We think this law creates challenges that go beyond its child safety goals, and creates significant barriers that limit free speech and disproportionately harm smaller platforms and emerging technologies, the Bluesky team said in its statement.
Bluesky did not respond to a request for comment.
The company says that compliance with Mississippis lawwhich would require identifying and tracking all users under 18, in addition to asking every user for sensitive personal information to verify their ageis not possible with the teams current resources and infrastructure. By not complying with the law, Bluesky could face fines of up to $10,000 per violation. It is the first major social media platform to take such drastic steps in response to the law.
Read more: https://www.wired.com/story/bluesky-goes-dark-in-mississippi-age-verification/
Eliot Rosewater
(34,296 posts)So red states are going to silence Patriots, big surprise
Polybius
(22,120 posts)msongs
(74,203 posts)mdbl
(8,755 posts)Bluesky doesn't.
Shipwack
(3,103 posts)I dont think BlueSky is profitable yet.
mdbl
(8,755 posts)I hope Bluesky remains as it is if it can eke by financially.
Shipwack
(3,103 posts)I too am hoping BlueSky stays around.
Even 2-bit brick and mortar vape stores with an online presence have age verification. Don't get me wrong - It's a BS law - but I also don't understand what "infrastructure" deficiencies could block them from getting one of the many "software as a service" outfits to provide the verification service. Bluesky isn't exactly small potatoes; their valuation is ~$700 million.
reACTIONary
(7,300 posts)Mississippi's age verification laws are significantly broader and more stringent than the current federal requirements, which are much more limited in scope. Federal law does not impose a single, uniform age verification framework for all online platforms. In contrast, Mississippi is among a growing number of states enacting specific, and often more burdensome, verification standards for websites and social media.
BradBo
(1,061 posts)The Wizard
(13,859 posts)for good cause. They haven't a clue that the welfare they use to survive is a government program. End Civil War reconstruction now.
reACTIONary
(7,300 posts)Our Concerns About Mississippis Approach
While we share the goal of protecting young people online, we have concerns about this laws implementation:
Broad scope: The law requires age verification for all users, not just those accessing age-restricted content, which affects the ability of everyone in Mississippi to use Bluesky.
Barriers to innovation: The compliance requirements disadvantage newer and smaller platforms like Bluesky, which do not have the luxury of big teams to build the necessary tooling. The law makes it harder for people to engage in free expression and chills the opportunity to communicate in new ways.
Privacy implications: The law requires collecting and storing sensitive personal information from all users, including detailed tracking of minors.
FakeNoose
(42,426 posts)Yeah, I didn't think so. Yep, it's total bullshit.
intheflow
(30,253 posts)Basically, a boycott of Mississippi over all-age privacy concerns.
Dave Bowman
(7,456 posts)What a bunch of cowards.
OldBaldy1701E
(11,553 posts)They don't give one shit about 'the kids'.
JoseBalow
(9,742 posts)Wonder Why
(7,235 posts)summer_in_TX
(4,278 posts)Last edited Tue Aug 26, 2025, 12:42 AM - Edit history (1)
So it's not clear to me how it stays funded. It's a wonderful platform, and I'd gladly pay a monthly membership fee.
No algorithms pushing sensational content.
Almost completely self-control of our personal algorithm - except for the Discover feed, which you can get rid of.
Filters can suit your own interests (I don't see much about crypto or AI for example, unless it's an article by someone I follow). I don't have to block people hardly ever, because I can filter out by words or terms, like typical anti-trans or pro-Trump content.
No ads
Bluesky and Substack are my two go-to's for discussions and great articles.
Seeking Serenity
(3,324 posts)Probably get a tax deduction for doing it, too.
Yay, billionaires!
Grins
(9,525 posts)HarryM
(467 posts)Lawmakers do not have a clue as to the technology. It is so simple to fake your age and location today, its laughable. Start with a VPN add stock photos fake ID, and there you go.
But the folks making the law have a hard time spelling the word Internet, let alone knowing how it works.
JohnnyRingo
(20,996 posts)There will be no age verification laws in states that elect sane representatives. At least for now.
Of course if voters want the state to babysit their children for them they should be thrilled with this and re-election is certain.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.