Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,153 posts)
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 04:50 AM Sep 2025

Judge Cannon just blew up Newsmax's 'shotgun' lawsuit against Fox News before the case even got off the ground

Source: Law & Crime

Sep 5th, 2025, 5:22 pm


Just one day after Newsmax sued Fox News, claiming the Rupert Murdoch-founded network had illegally monopolized the "right-leaning pay TV" cable news space, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon threw out the lawsuit for being a "shotgun" mess before the case could even get off the ground.

The court docket in Newsmax Broadcasting, LLC v. Fox Corporation and Fox News Network, LLC, shows that the lawsuit was filed on Wednesday under the theory that Fox has engaged in "longstanding and ongoing" anticompetitive conduct that "leverages [its] market power to coerce distributors into not carrying or into marginalizing other right-leaning news channels, including Newsmax."

That same day, Cannon — an appointee of President Donald Trump who dragged out and then threw out special counsel Jack Smith's Espionage Act investigation and prosecution of the then-candidate — was assigned the case.

By Thursday, Cannon had already determined that Newsmax's antitrust complaint must be thrown out as an "impermissible 'shotgun pleading,'" explaining that by "shotgun" she meant "a complaint containing multiple counts where each count adopts the allegations of all preceding counts, causing each successive count to carry all that came before and the last count to be a combination of the entire complaint."

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/judge-cannon-just-blew-up-newsmaxs-shotgun-lawsuit-against-fox-news-before-the-case-even-got-off-the-ground/

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge Cannon just blew up Newsmax's 'shotgun' lawsuit against Fox News before the case even got off the ground (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Sep 2025 OP
From a vague spectator perspective, I'd bet there could (have been) and still is a case there hlthe2b Sep 2025 #1
Apparently she gave them the option to refile BumRushDaShow Sep 2025 #2
Some jurisdictions recogonize a "motion for a more specific pleading." John1956PA Sep 2025 #4
It is to laugh RVN VET71 Sep 2025 #6
And Fox DOES? hlthe2b Sep 2025 #7
Sorry about that, but it's kind of axiomatic the Fox is of the Devil RVN VET71 Sep 2025 #16
She's still kicking cans down the road, I see padah513 Sep 2025 #3
Don't bring a shotgun to a cannon fight. Marcuse Sep 2025 #5
Day-am! I've bought extra popcorn to eat while watching the entertainment. JoetheShow Sep 2025 #8
Keep the faith BaronChocula Sep 2025 #13
Even SHE has her limits. mwb970 Sep 2025 #9
Newsmax-Fox complaint pdf ificandream Sep 2025 #10
This strikes me as like Oeditpus Rex Sep 2025 #11
She got the phone call. Sneederbunk Sep 2025 #12
Bad lawyering on Newmax's part. onenote Sep 2025 #14
I hope it continues, and costs them both a lot of money JoseBalow Sep 2025 #15
My read RedArkGuy Sep 2025 #17
My read: onenote Sep 2025 #18

hlthe2b

(114,652 posts)
1. From a vague spectator perspective, I'd bet there could (have been) and still is a case there
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 05:52 AM
Sep 2025

Maybe this will piss off NewsMax enough that they decide to do a little ACTUAL reporting on Canon, Trump, Fox, and the corruption that lies barely under the surface.

BumRushDaShow

(172,153 posts)
2. Apparently she gave them the option to refile
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 06:05 AM
Sep 2025

if they clean it up.

But these are a group of loons who only hire loon lawyers like a Pirro, to attempt to argue a case.

John1956PA

(5,118 posts)
4. Some jurisdictions recogonize a "motion for a more specific pleading."
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 06:52 AM
Sep 2025

Also, when the the initial pleading (the "complaint" ) is deemed to be vague or improperly structured, the plaintiff has the right to file an amended compliant within a set period of time after the vagueness or structuring issue is raised.

RVN VET71

(3,216 posts)
6. It is to laugh
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 09:12 AM
Sep 2025

NewsMax doing actual reporting? I think the charter they exist under forbids such gross anti-MAGA behavior.

RVN VET71

(3,216 posts)
16. Sorry about that, but it's kind of axiomatic the Fox is of the Devil
Sun Sep 7, 2025, 09:27 PM
Sep 2025

Hasn't reported on a story it could distort and outright lie about, at least since Roger Ailes -- may the his fat and diseased soul burn forever in Hell -- arrived to wrest the network from its boring mediocrity by introducing lying as its major product. Oh, and rampant sexism.

JoetheShow

(155 posts)
8. Day-am! I've bought extra popcorn to eat while watching the entertainment.
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 11:49 AM
Sep 2025

I guess I'll have to wait for the Epstein files now.

BaronChocula

(4,736 posts)
13. Keep the faith
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 02:56 PM
Sep 2025

Newsmaga will find another maga way to keep this going. Whether it's in the legal system or smearing their waste on the walls at Fox headquarters, something tells me this might not be over.

ificandream

(11,851 posts)
10. Newsmax-Fox complaint pdf
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 01:34 PM
Sep 2025

extension://moflefeaglahaffdcfllaceiidcfmpdb/lib/pdfjs/web/viewer.html?file=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsmax.com%2FNewsmax%2Fmedia%2FPDFs%2FNewsmaxFoxComplaint.pdf

 

Oeditpus Rex

(43,094 posts)
11. This strikes me as like
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 01:36 PM
Sep 2025

the New York Giants suing the Yankees in 1956 for winning more championships and drawing more fans, even though they're right across the Harlem River.

onenote

(46,227 posts)
14. Bad lawyering on Newmax's part.
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 03:15 PM
Sep 2025

The Eleventh Circuit, which is the circuit in which Cannon's court is located, is notable for having actively policed shotgun pleadings and has a well-developed body of law addressing these filings. The most common form of shotgun pleading it has identified as improper under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is a complaint "where each count adopts the allegations of the preceding counts until a final count combines all prior allegations."

In short, Cannon's ruling was totally predictable in light of Eleventh Circuit precedent and could/should have been avoided had Newmax's attorneys not screwed up.

RedArkGuy

(893 posts)
17. My read
Sun Sep 7, 2025, 09:56 PM
Sep 2025

She knows that when she's eventually removed from the federal bench for corruption and incompetence getting a show on Fox News will be much higher paying than one on Newsmax.

onenote

(46,227 posts)
18. My read:
Sun Sep 7, 2025, 11:32 PM
Sep 2025

She knew that if she didn't dismiss the complaint on her own, Fox would move to dismiss it and if she didn't, the 11th Circuit would reverse her decision because 11th Circuit precedent makes it clear the complaint was defective. So she dismissed it on her own motion, without prejudice, giving Newsmax until the 11th to refile a properly constructed complaint.

In short, she kept the case moving faster than might otherwise have been the case -- doing Fox no favors in the process.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge Cannon just blew up...