Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,297 posts)
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 09:25 AM Sep 2025

'Frankly outrageous': Dem slams court for using 'shadow docket' to hand Trump another win

Source: Raw Story

September 8, 2025 11:23PM ET


Democratic strategist Neera Tanden slammed the Supreme Court's decision on Monday to allow immigration officials to use race to decide who to target for immigration actions.

Neera Tanden, CEO of the Center for American Progress, joined CNN's "NewsNight with Abby Phillip" on Monday to discuss the Supreme Court's ruling.

Tanden argued that it the court should give a "rationalization" of its decision because of the magnitude of the case.

"The fact that they are providing these decisions without any explanation, while Justice Amy Coney Barrett has time to write a memoir but not a decision, on an issue that affects all of our rights, is frankly outrageous," Tanden said.

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/neera-tanden/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Frankly outrageous': Dem slams court for using 'shadow docket' to hand Trump another win (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Sep 2025 OP
Because even the law clerks for the six Justices can't come up with credible no_hypocrisy Sep 2025 #1
Is the shady docket, er, shadow docket the Baitball Blogger Sep 2025 #2
The simple explanation is that without profiling, they'll never get anywhere near their deportation goals William Seger Sep 2025 #3
I guess that means that some SCOTUS justices are willing to tear up the Constitution FakeNoose Sep 2025 #5
State Sponsored Pogroms 2na fisherman Sep 2025 #4

no_hypocrisy

(55,384 posts)
1. Because even the law clerks for the six Justices can't come up with credible
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 09:29 AM
Sep 2025

and cogent rationales, despite their resumes of Law Review from Harvard, Yale Law Schools.

My Question: Why even have the parties submit legal briefs that aren't going to be used for the Shadow Docket?

William Seger

(12,531 posts)
3. The simple explanation is that without profiling, they'll never get anywhere near their deportation goals
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 09:56 AM
Sep 2025

... and SOME justices wouldn't want THAT to happen!

FakeNoose

(42,426 posts)
5. I guess that means that some SCOTUS justices are willing to tear up the Constitution
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 12:11 PM
Sep 2025

... and the Bill of Rights in order to help ICE meet their phony self-imposed deportation goals?

2na fisherman

(364 posts)
4. State Sponsored Pogroms
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 11:27 AM
Sep 2025

So what's next, forcing immigrants to wear ethnic identifying patches on their clothes? The Supreme Court is dooming this country to repeat the mistakes of the past. Will they be okay with forcing all Jews to wear the Star of David symbol on their clothes? Stephen Miller must already have some racist patch designs to force Mexican immigrants to wear.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Frankly outrageous': Dem...