Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(59,427 posts)
Sat Dec 13, 2025, 12:03 PM Yesterday

Questions of accuracy arise as Washington Post uses AI to create personalized podcasts

Source: NPR

It's not your mother's podcast — or your father's, or anyone else's. The Washington Post's new offering, "Your Personal Podcast," uses artificial intelligence to customize podcasts for its users, blending the algorithm you might find in a news feed with the convenience of portable audio.

The podcast is "personalized automatically based on your reading history" of Post articles, the newspaper says on its help page. Listeners also have some control: At the click of a button, they can alter their podcast's topic mix — or even swap its computer-generated "hosts."

-snip-

In the newspaper's app, a note advises listeners to "verify information" by checking the podcast against its source material.

In a statement, the Washington Post Guild — which represents newsroom employees and other staff — tells NPR, "We are concerned about this new product and its rollout," alleging that it undermines the Post's mission and its journalists' work.

-snip-

Read more: https://www.npr.org/2025/12/13/nx-s1-5641047/washington-posts-ai-podcast



So here's their AI podcast, but it gets its news wrong, so you're on your own with fact-checking. This is the standard corporate disclaimer for generative AI tools that can make mistakes on almost anything. Mistakes the corporations don't want to be held legally liable for.

This is a customized podcast because the goal is to get customers addicted to using it. That's more important than truth and journalistic integrity to the Post.

And any children or gullible adults who can be conned into making this AI corporate-controlled puppet show a source of news can be very easily fed disinformation and manipulated by those controlling the AI, as the foolish customers choose fake journalists they find particularly likable or trustworthy - fake journalists who still get their script from a corporation. It's sort of a do-it-yourself create-your-own-brainwasher kit. And it takes time away from getting more news more quickly, from more reliable sources, by reading.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Questions of accuracy arise as Washington Post uses AI to create personalized podcasts (Original Post) highplainsdem Yesterday OP
The WP is worthless, yesterday if called the Russian invasion "a 4 year conflict" UpInArms Yesterday #1
You are replying to an Ai driven website FredGarvin Yesterday #3
Very good point The WaPo is a purveyor of poorly done AI. erronis Yesterday #5
i would have like to have read: "Met to help end Moscows 11 year invasion of Ukraine." erronis Yesterday #4
Google .... reACTIONary Yesterday #6
cool reporting! FredGarvin Yesterday #2
Absolutely WRONG thing for an AI application William Seger Yesterday #7
The podcast is "personalized automatically based on your reading history" of Post articles ToxMarz Yesterday #8

UpInArms

(53,884 posts)
1. The WP is worthless, yesterday if called the Russian invasion "a 4 year conflict"
Sat Dec 13, 2025, 12:09 PM
Yesterday
Over the last several weeks, President Volodymyr Zelensky’s lead negotiator, Rustem Umerov, flew to Miami three times to meet with President Donald Trump’s top envoy, Steve Witkoff, and discuss a proposal to end the nearly four-year conflict with Russia.


Except it started in 2014 …

Sheesh

erronis

(22,356 posts)
4. i would have like to have read: "Met to help end Moscows 11 year invasion of Ukraine."
Sat Dec 13, 2025, 12:33 PM
Yesterday

As in tell Putin to to get his ass back up north and stay there.

reACTIONary

(6,926 posts)
6. Google ....
Sat Dec 13, 2025, 12:48 PM
Yesterday

Last edited Sat Dec 13, 2025, 06:53 PM - Edit history (1)

That's the way it is referred to, world wide, by news sources, think tanks, analysts, etc.

William Seger

(12,131 posts)
7. Absolutely WRONG thing for an AI application
Sat Dec 13, 2025, 01:31 PM
Yesterday

Nobody really knows how AI comes up with the things it says, but we know it can "hallucinate." News needs to be reliable, but I guess the WP has already forfeited that assumption, anyway.

ToxMarz

(2,702 posts)
8. The podcast is "personalized automatically based on your reading history" of Post articles
Sat Dec 13, 2025, 01:35 PM
Yesterday

Another reason I'm happy I don't pay for access to read them.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Questions of accuracy ari...