Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(68,226 posts)
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 06:58 AM 21 hrs ago

Heritage paper on families calls for 'marriage bootcamp,' more babies

Source: Washington Post

Heritage paper on families calls for ‘marriage bootcamp,’ more babies

The conservative think tank aims to boost U.S. marriage and birth rates through recommendations to discourage online dating, restrict pornography, create tax credits for bigger families and more.

January 8, 2026 at 6:00 a.m. EST 55 minutes ago


A banner of President Donald Trump hangs on the western face at the Heritage Foundation building near the U.S. Capitol in Washington. (Tom Brenner/For The Washington Post)

By Brianna Tucker and Jacob Bogage

A conservative think tank tied to the architects of Project 2025 is rolling out a sweeping set of policy proposals aimed at reshaping American families and promoting marriage and childbearing between heterosexual couples, according to a draft report obtained by The Washington Post.

{snip}

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2026/01/08/heritage-report-promote-marriage-births/

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Heritage paper on families calls for 'marriage bootcamp,' more babies (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves 21 hrs ago OP
Just what sane people don't need or want - Think Tanks in their bedrooms bucolic_frolic 21 hrs ago #1
How About A "Mind Your Own Fucking Business" Bootcamp for the Heritage Foundation . . . hatrack 21 hrs ago #2
would they please stop meddling with american families. rampartd 21 hrs ago #3
Germany had similar stuff 90 years ago IronLionZion 21 hrs ago #4
The Soviet Union, especially under Stalin, did the same thing. eppur_se_muova 11 hrs ago #31
After killing off millions of people they didn't like through starvation IronLionZion 11 hrs ago #35
Children for Hitler dalton99a 20 hrs ago #5
Sonnenkinder get the red out 15 hrs ago #23
"...racially valuable stock" 3catwoman3 14 hrs ago #27
"Heritage paper on families calls for 'marriage bootcamp,' more white babies" Ray Bruns 20 hrs ago #6
aka forcible rape centers. nt Javaman 20 hrs ago #7
I got my vasectomy at Planned Parenthood for only $400. saved me millions. multigraincracker 20 hrs ago #8
Free daycare ... kerouac2 20 hrs ago #9
Exactly this Ferryboat 16 hrs ago #21
No, they will just make it illegal for women with young children to work outside the home DBoon 13 hrs ago #28
Fewer women are bothering with marriage and kids, period. valleyrogue 9 hrs ago #39
But only for white people Ferrets are Cool 19 hrs ago #10
This came right out of the nazi playbook. MLWR 19 hrs ago #11
Hey, give Stalin his due ! (see my post #31) eppur_se_muova 11 hrs ago #32
Any solution except raising salaries for working families Random Boomer 19 hrs ago #12
Excellent point PatSeg 18 hrs ago #17
Many young women aren't bothering to marry, let alone want kids. valleyrogue 8 hrs ago #40
And there are many people who should PatSeg 6 hrs ago #42
Absoluely! get the red out 15 hrs ago #24
This proves the value of history. ReRe 19 hrs ago #13
Another step toward a fascist dictatorship. patphil 19 hrs ago #14
How about encouraging more births by giving young couples hope that their children will not inherit a destroyed country LaMouffette 18 hrs ago #15
This... Ollie Garkie 11 hrs ago #34
Fewer and fewer women are bothering to marry and have kids. They LIKE being alone and having their own valleyrogue 9 hrs ago #38
They seem to forget we are Americans and all during our lives we have been told samnsara 18 hrs ago #16
Incel think tanks Historic NY 17 hrs ago #18
The Heritage foundation was always an anti-communist right wing propaganda outlet. the irony here is that they are Martin68 16 hrs ago #19
Some say no to kids because of 1) life and health of mother is being disregarded, 2) economy and 3) fascism lostnfound 16 hrs ago #20
To be fair angrychair 16 hrs ago #22
In other words... OldBaldy1701E 14 hrs ago #25
I've always wondered how that building is still standing tonekat 14 hrs ago #26
Immigrants tend to have more kids than native-born Americans Jose Garcia 13 hrs ago #29
They're forgetting one important point. No sane woman wants to hop in the sack with a Republican. Vinca 12 hrs ago #30
Sadly, there's no big shortage of insane women -- just look at Trmp's cabinet. eppur_se_muova 11 hrs ago #33
It is a deal breaker for many, many single women, both younger and older. valleyrogue 8 hrs ago #41
Under His Eye NickB79 9 hrs ago #36
There's no going back to the 1950s, valleyrogue 9 hrs ago #37

bucolic_frolic

(54,049 posts)
1. Just what sane people don't need or want - Think Tanks in their bedrooms
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 07:05 AM
21 hrs ago

Stop the crazy! Pleeeeze!!!

hatrack

(64,253 posts)
2. How About A "Mind Your Own Fucking Business" Bootcamp for the Heritage Foundation . . .
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 07:10 AM
21 hrs ago

Assuming, of course, that there's anybody still working there.

IronLionZion

(50,820 posts)
4. Germany had similar stuff 90 years ago
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 07:20 AM
21 hrs ago

They wanted lots more of the right type of babies for some reason. hmmm....

eppur_se_muova

(40,989 posts)
31. The Soviet Union, especially under Stalin, did the same thing.
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 04:31 PM
11 hrs ago
Family Code of 1936

Unlike earlier codes that arranged for temporary and transitive laws as a step toward the revolutionary vision of family; the Code of 1936 marked an ideological shift away from Marxist / revolutionary visions of the nuclear family.[12] Coinciding with the rise of Stalinism, the law demanded the stabilizing and strengthening of the family. "The "withering-away" doctrine, once central to socialist understand of the family, law, and the state, was anathematized."[5]

The 1936 code emerged along with an eruption of pro-family propaganda.[12] For the first time, the code put restrictions on abortion and imposed fines and jail time for any that received or performed the service. The code also enacted a bevy of laws aimed to encourage pregnancy and child birth. Insurance stipends, pregnancy leave, job security, light duty, child care services and payments for large families. In another drastic move, the code made it more difficult to obtain a divorce. Under the code, both parties would need to be present for a divorce and pay a fine. There could be harsh penalties for those who failed to pay alimony and child-support payments.[5]

"Our demands grow day to day. We need fighters, they build this life. We need people."[5] The wider campaign to encourage the family unit elevated motherhood to a form of Stakhanovite labor. During this time, motherhood was celebrated as patriotic and the joys of children and family were extolled by the country's leaders.

Family Edict of 1944

The Family Edict of 1944 would be a continuation of the conservative trending of the 1936 code. Citing the heavy manpower losses and social disruption following World War II, the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet enacted laws that would further encourage marriage and childbirth.

The 1944 Edict offered greater state-sponsored benefits to mothers, including: Extended maternity leave, increased family allowances even to unmarried mothers, promises of burgeoning child care services, targeted labor protections, and most notably, state recognition and the honorary title "Mother Heroine" for mothers who could produce large families.[13]

The edict also sought to preserve the family unit by making divorces even more difficult to obtain. Fines were increased and the parties were often ordered to attempt reconciliation. Divorce also became a public matter. Divorcees were required to appear in public court and their intent was published in the local newspaper.[14]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_in_the_Soviet_Union#Family_Code_of_1936



"Large" families meant at least 10 children.

I hope this was referenced in footnotes in the "Project 2025" paper. Credit should go where credit is due, and Stalin's contribution was substantial.

dalton99a

(92,127 posts)
5. Children for Hitler
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 07:26 AM
20 hrs ago
https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/nazi-germanys-lebensborn-program-children-for-hitler/

Children for Hitler
The Nazi Lebensborn Program was conceived to provide A supply of Aryan children for the future of the Third Reich.
This article appears in: April 2020
By Brent Douglas Dyck

By 1936, 18-year-old Hildegard Koch had reached a crossroads in her young life as she finished her schooling. Her leader in the local Bund Deutscher Mädel (the League of German Girls), gave her some advice: “If you don’t know what to do, why not give the Führer a child? What Germany needs more than anything is racially valuable stock.” It was the first time that Koch had heard of the Lebensborn Program.

In 1933, the year Hitler and the Nazis came to power, the birth rate in Germany was 14.7 per 1,000 people. This was less than half what it had been at the turn of the century. Additionally, there were hundreds of thousands of abortions performed in Germany every year. These two practices alarmed the Nazi regime. The Nazis needed children if they were to accomplish the two goals of Nazi ideology: conquer territory in the East and establish Aryan supremacy over Europe. Healthy young boys were needed to grow up to be soldiers in the German Army. Healthy young girls were needed to grow up and give birth to the next generation of super soldiers.

Heinrich Himmler, the leader of the SS, founded the Lebensborn Program on December 12, 1935. Lebensborn means “the fountain of life.” The program actually provided three services: it gave pregnant women, either married or unmarried, a place to give birth to their babies and receive the best medical care; a meeting place for men and women of true Aryan stock to create babies for Adolf Hitler; and a place to raise children who had Aryan features after they had been kidnapped from their parents from foreign countries.

Himmler explained the main purpose of the Lebensborn program in an undated letter to Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel. “Official statistics show that there are still some 600,000 abortions annually in Germany. I have been concerned for years about the fact that many abortions occur among those who can be counted as the best sections of German society. I do not believe that we can tolerate a situation where annually hundreds of thousands of valuable girls and women are lost as mothers of German stock because they have illicit abortions whose effect is often to render them sterile … the aim of protecting German blood, however, has the highest priority.''


The SS flag flies above a nurse who pushes baby carriages at a Lebensborn home in Germany.

...

multigraincracker

(36,988 posts)
8. I got my vasectomy at Planned Parenthood for only $400. saved me millions.
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 07:53 AM
20 hrs ago

Plus, not having and kids, my carbon footprint ends with me.

Ferryboat

(1,214 posts)
21. Exactly this
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 11:36 AM
16 hrs ago

Child care and health care.

You want more babies, make it easier to raise them.
Do it right, paying a living wage would go along ways to getting more kids.

DBoon

(24,739 posts)
28. No, they will just make it illegal for women with young children to work outside the home
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 02:28 PM
13 hrs ago

the right always supports a punitive approach, as opposed to policies that might actually work

valleyrogue

(2,586 posts)
39. Fewer women are bothering with marriage and kids, period.
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 07:18 PM
9 hrs ago

It won't matter what the Heritage Foundation does or tries to push.

eppur_se_muova

(40,989 posts)
32. Hey, give Stalin his due ! (see my post #31)
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 04:33 PM
11 hrs ago

You know Trmp would be thrilled to be compared to a "strong" Russian leader.

Random Boomer

(4,385 posts)
12. Any solution except raising salaries for working families
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 09:11 AM
19 hrs ago

If the Heritage Foundation really wanted people to have more children, they could strongly support policies that make it easier to raise children: Raise minimum wage, mandate maternity/paternity leave, fund prenatal care, create and subsidize childcare facilities.

Funny how none of those policies occur to them. And if they insist that woman's place is in the home raising those children, instead of sending them to a daycare facility, then it's even more important that the working parent makes a living wage.

PatSeg

(52,178 posts)
17. Excellent point
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 10:18 AM
18 hrs ago

There are plenty of people who would have more children if it was affordable.

valleyrogue

(2,586 posts)
40. Many young women aren't bothering to marry, let alone want kids.
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 07:22 PM
8 hrs ago

There is absolutely NOTHING these rightwingers can do about it.

The train left the station decades ago. There is no turning back.

PatSeg

(52,178 posts)
42. And there are many people who should
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 09:40 PM
6 hrs ago

not become parents. Not everyone is cut out for it. It used to be expected of young couples, but not so much anymore. People are free to make that choice themselves...at least for now.

get the red out

(13,958 posts)
24. Absoluely!
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 12:27 PM
15 hrs ago

It's hard for 2 working parents to raise kids now. But these Oligarchs want them to try to raise them on the pay of one while they continue to steal from regular people. I cringe at the word "heritage".

ReRe

(12,172 posts)
13. This proves the value of history.
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 09:16 AM
19 hrs ago

Can make one aware of what nefarious schemes a government might be leading one into.

patphil

(8,732 posts)
14. Another step toward a fascist dictatorship.
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 09:17 AM
19 hrs ago

Just for the record, it's very expensive to have and raise a child in the United States. This, of course, varies greatly due to the local cost of living, but can easily run 250,000 - 350,000 dollars by the time the child is an adult.

https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/money/a60323245/cost-to-raise-a-child/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=mgu_ga_ghk_md_pmx_hybd_mix_us_19597983321&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=19597985697&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIo676n5H8kQMVaDQIBR0DMi43EAAYASAAEgLWz_D_BwE

It's easy to tell people to have more children, but much harder to actually do the work. And, the government isn't interested in helping families with the expense.

LaMouffette

(2,569 posts)
15. How about encouraging more births by giving young couples hope that their children will not inherit a destroyed country
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 09:33 AM
18 hrs ago

and a world transformed by the climate crisis, fascist authoritarianism, and a fractured US and world economy? We are on the precipice of disaster. I don't blame anyone for not wanting to bring children into this world.

Ollie Garkie

(340 posts)
34. This...
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 04:41 PM
11 hrs ago

Thisthisthisthisthis. I decided 20 fucking years go not ro have kids because of THEM.

valleyrogue

(2,586 posts)
38. Fewer and fewer women are bothering to marry and have kids. They LIKE being alone and having their own
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 07:16 PM
9 hrs ago

money.

There is no incentive in the world that will EVER force, coerce, or "encourage" them to marry and reproduce.

Marriage is on the way out in the West, as I have said many times. High birthrates will never return because the 1950s were aberrant.

samnsara

(18,720 posts)
16. They seem to forget we are Americans and all during our lives we have been told
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 09:39 AM
18 hrs ago

that we are the BEST the BIGGEST the RICHEST and the 'Free-ist'...this message has been crammed down our throats all our lives so NOW they think WE are gonna listen to THEM tell US what to do and how to act?

No fucking way.....

Martin68

(27,061 posts)
19. The Heritage foundation was always an anti-communist right wing propaganda outlet. the irony here is that they are
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 11:29 AM
16 hrs ago

recommending Soviet-style control and enforcement on families to increase the birth rate, and breed obedient drones

lostnfound

(17,407 posts)
20. Some say no to kids because of 1) life and health of mother is being disregarded, 2) economy and 3) fascism
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 11:34 AM
16 hrs ago

No trust in where the US is heading. They don’t want to bring kids into this ugly world/ugly society.
No trust in the ability of doctors to protect the life of the mother.
No trust in a positive economic direction including affording healthcare.

OldBaldy1701E

(10,188 posts)
25. In other words...
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 02:03 PM
14 hrs ago

They want to legalize r*pe.

They want to make it okay to sexually assault someone. That is what they want to do and they want the ability to do it without consequence.

tonekat

(2,451 posts)
26. I've always wondered how that building is still standing
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 02:13 PM
14 hrs ago

It's an affront to our rights. Every employee should be harassed and doxxed.

Vinca

(53,353 posts)
30. They're forgetting one important point. No sane woman wants to hop in the sack with a Republican.
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 03:50 PM
12 hrs ago

eppur_se_muova

(40,989 posts)
33. Sadly, there's no big shortage of insane women -- just look at Trmp's cabinet.
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 04:38 PM
11 hrs ago

Last edited Thu Jan 8, 2026, 06:19 PM - Edit history (1)

It's like a joint production of "Wicked" and "Cruella".

valleyrogue

(2,586 posts)
41. It is a deal breaker for many, many single women, both younger and older.
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 07:23 PM
8 hrs ago

Being a MAGA is absolutely toxic.

valleyrogue

(2,586 posts)
37. There's no going back to the 1950s,
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 07:14 PM
9 hrs ago

which were absolute shit for women anyway.

The train left the station decades ago.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Heritage paper on familie...