Trump plans to use Venezuela's huge crude reserves 'to cut US oil price to $50 a barrel'
Source: The Guardian
Thu 8 Jan 2026 07.00 EST
First published on Thu 8 Jan 2026 06.07 EST
Donald Trump plans to use Venezuelas vast crude reserves to establish control of most of the western hemispheres oil in an attempt to drive the market price down to about $50 (£37) a barrel, according to reports.
The US president has repeatedly raised the prospect of producing enough crude from Venezuelas oilfields to drive down the US oil price from more than $56 a barrel today to about $50 in an effort to cut energy costs for consumers, according to the Wall Street Journal, which cited senior Trump administration officials.
Global oil markets have already recorded significant losses in recent years due to an oversupply of crude. Prices slumped by almost 20% in 2025, marking the biggest annual loss since the Covid-19 pandemic and the first time the oil market has recorded three consecutive years of annual losses.
As well as driving market prices lower, officials reportedly claimed Trumps plans to control Venezuelas oil reserves, which are the largest in the world, include cutting Russia and Chinas access to the South American country in order to establish a western hemisphere oil production stronghold.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/08/trump-plans-use-venezuela-huge-oil-reserves-to-cut-us-consumer-price-to-50-a-barrel
From the article -

jls4561
(2,841 posts)walkingman
(10,352 posts)moonshinegnomie
(3,877 posts)especially in venezuela which produces a heavy thick tar like crude.
ToxMarz
(2,758 posts)which it will because there is no production. They're not going to produce at a loss, nothing is better than a negative something. I bet Wharton cringes everytime he touts is education came from there.
Jack Valentino
(4,375 posts)The cost of production will be more than the price....
Would be good for consumers in the short-run, but they could well end up paying more when all the producers cut production...
A Badger
(44 posts)...is labeled as "bituminous". Only slightly less viscous than Canada's Athabascan 'Tar sands' stuff.
Overheard on the Internet:
"...So when you hear that Venezuela has the worlds largest oil reserves, the technically accurate part is that the country has extremely large volumes of extra-heavy oil in place, and a big subset of that was once judged economically recoverable at high price assumptions and booked as 'proved'. The more relevant questions for energy strategy are how many of those barrels are genuinely economic under realistic long-term prices, how quickly they can be brought onstream given infrastructure and institutional constraints, what netback they deliver at the refinery gate, and how exposed they are to being left in the ground if demand peaks. On those metrics, Venezuelan barrels sit much further out on the cost and risk curve than the headline largest reserves soundbite suggests."
I.e.,- at $50/barrel, the US oil majors wouldn't invest a dime, and would leave the Venezuelan 'stranded''.
C_U_L8R
(48,885 posts)No wonder he's gone bankrupt so many times.
popsdenver
(1,564 posts)he will cut drug prices 200,400, 1600% Anything over 100% and that is the amount the Drug Manufacturer will pay the consumer to use their drug...........LOL
The Wharton? School of Business should be ashamed.........The school (and all his professors) obviously allowed Trumps father to BUY his degree.....
Makes you wonder how many Rich kids graduate with degrees that were literally BOUGHT, not only from This school, but other high ranking institutions across America......
Wasn't it WBush that went to Harvard and graduated that way, but they didn't dare let him go to their law school knowing the Law school professors wouldn't just pass him because of who he was???????? Or maybe it was allowing him in to get his MBA???
I will have to check on that and delete this if I am 'Mis-Remembering" LOL
****I checked and it was Yale that gave him an undergraduate degree, but wouldn't admit him to their law school, but Dartmouth admitted them to THEIR law school.....I wonder if he ever was able to pass the BAR ???????????
ruet
(10,183 posts)Remember when the US oil industry, pretty much, stopped drilling for oil because the price was so low? How TF are they, supposedly, going along with this?
SergeStorms
(19,997 posts)Of course I'm so old I remember Hitler bombing Pearl Harbor.
bluestarone
(21,193 posts)between now and NOV. i'll get that gas price down, then these ddumb ASS's will vote for my republicans again. MANY will ofcourse.
mjvpi
(1,876 posts)Leverage to get Russia to negotiate peace with Ukraine. One can dream.
BumRushDaShow
(165,821 posts)when they did a "production war" and crashed the price of oil as far down as ~$38.50/bbl (meaning they were willing to pay to store it)!
Saudis Plan Big Oil Output Hike, Beginning All-Out Price War
Crude Oil has gone NEGATIVE!

Callie1979
(1,150 posts)Putin had sent a sub to protect it but the Navy beat it
Buddyzbuddy
(2,133 posts)Sounds like a job for TACO MAN!
underpants
(194,947 posts)Buddyzbuddy
(2,133 posts)I merely stated an observation and probable conclusion. I didn't advocate for anything.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,430 posts)but pointing out rhetorically that $50/b oil would decimate the US oil industry.
Buddyzbuddy
(2,133 posts)Hence, taco man.
underpants
(194,947 posts)Buddyzbuddy
(2,133 posts)Must have misread. It must be me, today.
SergeStorms
(19,997 posts)But then I think about Ms. Good's family and friends.....then I stop the self-pity. It can always get worse. 😳
Ol Janx Spirit
(726 posts)Capitalism does not want oil to be that cheap as there is no profit in it. If it did we could already have even cheaper oil. OPEC has used their collective power to make sure the price of oil stays where it is profitable for them by increasing or decreasing supply.
Venezuela is a founding and current member of OPEC, but I guess that will change now?
So, is he saying that the government is going to control both the natural resources and the means of production in order to push oil down to $50 a barrel?
Callie1979
(1,150 posts)Ol Janx Spirit
(726 posts)I guess that is more accurate.
riversedge
(79,455 posts)Ol Janx Spirit
(726 posts)That's basically what Stephen Miller said on Tuesday.
And apparently there is some truth to it.
And when you're a superpower, they let you do it. You can do anything.... Grab 'em by the oil....
Miguelito Loveless
(5,430 posts)needs the price to be around $70, or they shut down the well.
BumRushDaShow
(165,821 posts)DALLAS FED BREAKEVENS (2025)- https://www.dallasfed.org/research/energy/indicators/2025/en2504

(fracking would be higher)
Miguelito Loveless
(5,430 posts)BumRushDaShow
(165,821 posts)For some odd reason, I follow this.
Ray Bruns
(5,985 posts)MiHale
(12,629 posts)Oil from Venezuela, which Trump keeps claiming is now under his control, is a heavy sludge-like product filled with hydrogen sulfide and a slew of toxic metals that can destroy a refinery if not first removed, industry experts said. It must be diluted with imported petroleum products before it is even fluid enough to move, and its corrosiveness is the reason that much of the countrys oil drilling equipment is in such a state of disrepair.
Thats why the infrastructure has rotted away, said Matt Randolph, an oil industry executive with decades of experience. Its extremely corrosive and all of the equipment needs constant maintenance and chemical treatment to keep it from degrading.
The higher expense involved in processing Venezuelan oil, combined with current low oil prices globally and an uncertain oil demand in the future, means that the U.S. installation of a more cooperative ruler in that country may end up having no effect on what Americans pay for gasoline and heating oil.
An oil industry analyst, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said production could with relatively little cost ramp up from the current 1 million barrels a day being extracted in Venezuela by about 200,000 more barrels. Beyond that, though, will require massive new investments that might never pay off if oil prices remain low.
.more at link .
eppur_se_muova
(41,003 posts)I'd heard it was high-sulfur oil, but not that bad !
MiHale
(12,629 posts)eppur_se_muova
(41,003 posts)lonely bird
(2,776 posts)niyad
(129,586 posts)optimum conditions.
markodochartaigh
(5,036 posts)Step 2: Bail out oil companies with billions of US government dollars.
Step 3: Listen to outraged Republicans go ballistic over spiraling US debt.
(Spoiler alert: Step 3 never happens.)
BumRushDaShow
(165,821 posts)Step 4: WE GOTTA CUT MORE "ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS" (that are not really "entitlement programs" )!! !!111!!!1!!
Justice matters.
(9,402 posts)Dems in Congress have majorities (except for the anti-democratic filibuster in the Senate).
Coldwater
(947 posts)cover has trump drinking crude oil out of a barrel
BumRushDaShow
(165,821 posts)
truthisfreedom
(23,516 posts)is hidden under other countries. Someday well have to solve that mystery. Im sure its as complex as quantum physics.
intrepidity
(8,555 posts)Not to mention all of our stuff buried under Greenland!
flashman13
(2,029 posts)utherpendragon
(15 posts)Once the price of oil goes down, then the price of everything else will go down, don't you see? So, we are the big winners. Do I have that right?
NickB79
(20,249 posts)They can't make a profit unless oil is at least $55-$65/barrel.
Ironically, both states voted for Trump.
Nigrum Cattus
(1,227 posts)$50 a barrel oil won't matter when we have a country
of poor people who can't afford to feed themselves.
stupid, stupid, stupid
epstein, epstein, epstein
BidenRocks
(2,783 posts)when chump canceled the Offshore Wind and Solar projects.
He is forcing the issue against electric vehicles. If they were available here, I would look at a BYD!
Sorry GM. You were here in early 70s.
You are writing off electric to please chump.
No leadership there.
Tetrachloride
(9,384 posts)orangecrush
(28,416 posts)C Moon
(13,473 posts)Im sure Venezuela will be the same.
IronLionZion
(50,822 posts)because it's too high cost so they would lose money. It would take billions in investment to rebuild Venezuela's oil infrastructure. And then if he lowers the price they lose profits. So oil companies are not going to gain from this plan.
Venezuela, Russia, and most oil producing nations and oil companies all profit from higher oil prices. They don't want lower prices.
sakabatou
(45,776 posts)SalamanderSleeps
(951 posts)Monkeys just started to fly out my ass.
AverageOldGuy
(3,358 posts)One barrel of crude = 42 gallons
About 40% of a barrel becomes gasoline, which means a barrel of oil will yield 16.8 gallons of gas.
If a barrel cost $50 and yields only 16.8 gallons of gas, that means the gas will cost $2.98 a gallon to produce.
Add to the $2.68 transport, taxes, profit margin, etc., then gas will remain at or near $3.00 per gallon.
But try to explain this to MAGAts who failed 6th grade math.
SergeStorms
(19,997 posts)with all that cheap gas!
hay rick
(9,357 posts)artemisia1
(1,367 posts)Americans.