Birthers Suggest Impeaching Chief Justice John Roberts
Source: Huffington Post
Birthers Suggest Impeaching Chief Justice John Roberts
The Huffington Post | By John Celock Posted: 01/08/2013 11:36 am EST | Updated: 01/08/2013 11:44 am EST
The birther movement is now targeting Chief Justice John Roberts for impeachment if he swears in President Barack Obama for a second term later this month.
Craige McMillan, a columnist for the conservative publication WND.com, wrote a piece last week asking Roberts to not swear Obama in, because, according to McMillan, Obama does not meet the Constitution's definition of a natural born citizen. In the piece, McMillan claims that Obama is not a citizen because his father was a citizen of Kenya and the United Kingdom, and that Obama cannot be "a natural born citizen" because his father was not an American citizen. Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was born and raised in Kansas by parents who were born in Kansas.
McMillan wrote:
"Your failure to investigate these citizenship issues surrounding Mr. Obama at the time questions were raised during his first term places you in a terrible position. You are now confronted with a most difficult choice.
Your own oath of office, sworn before God and the American people, requires you to uphold the Constitution. (If not you, then who?) If you now administer the oath of office for the presidency to a man who by his own admission fails to meet the natural born citizen requirement imposed by that Constitution, you have violated your own oath of office and are rightly subject to impeachment by any House of Representatives, at any time, now or in the future."
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/08/john-roberts-birthers_n_2432334.html?1357663011&icid=maing-grid7|maing6|dl1|sec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D254344
sakabatou
(46,148 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Palm to my face. These people are just incredible. How do they think these things up?
hughee99
(16,113 posts)Maybe they got the idea while trolling.
yellowcanine
(36,792 posts)Cantor as well as all of the other relevant House GOP leaders!
PerceptionManagement
(486 posts)AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)
sakabatou
(46,148 posts)
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)
sakabatou
(46,148 posts)
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)




alp227
(33,282 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)he's not a citizen. Geesh, where do these guys find these "facts?"
sakabatou
(46,148 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Truly sad and pathetic.
Cal33
(7,018 posts)kiranon
(1,739 posts)Mike Nelson
(10,943 posts)Then President Obama can pick Roberts' replacement!
orwell
(8,003 posts)ZM90
(706 posts)Faygo Kid
(21,492 posts)The GOP has lost its mind to be affiliated with these crazies.
Mike Daniels
(5,842 posts)It's not like these nuts are going to throw away their vote by forming some fringe party that will only guarantee more Democratic victories.
Rob H.
(5,851 posts)Just when you think the birthers can't possibly get any dumber....
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)SERIOUS mental health issues with these freaks.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Corporations are people and have rights superior to people need to go.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Vincardog
(20,234 posts)WhoIsNumberNone
(7,875 posts)Nothing I'd love more than to see that fascist bounced off the Supreme Court 30+ years ahead of schedule.
bobclark86
(1,415 posts)over upholding ObamaCare. Nothing to see here.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Oh, who am I kidding...
Cha
(319,079 posts)be so blindingly stupid.
that they just don't know how blatantly stupid they are and, therefore, it doesn't hurt... and so they carry on blindly. The good part is that it shows how rabidly racist they are and they are so stupid about it that they are willing to eat their own to cut off their nose to spite their face... if that's metaphorically possible...
Cha
(319,079 posts)They can't smell their own crap.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,316 posts)reACTIONary
(7,162 posts)Hugabear
(10,340 posts)That's how they're gonna get rid of Piers Morgan, right?
jsr
(7,712 posts)graham4anything
(11,464 posts)BlueNoteSpecial
(141 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Bush was smart when he picked John Roberts since he was just over 50 when he not only was point on the Supreme Court but was made Chief Justice. At age 57 today that means Roberts would only be about 61 when the new President comes into office. Regardless of party, Roberts will still be around.
To be honest Roberts could be in that position for another 20-30 years.
Ineeda
(3,626 posts)one in '93 and one in '07. Although the official prognosis is that he has no serious health issues, IMO another seizure would very likely force an earlier-than-anticipated retirement. Not that I wish him ill or anything...
kooljerk666
(776 posts)and likes boats. If I recall correctly he was found on a dock next to the boat one time. If he falls in water during a stroke he is history.
I grew up on the Del. River & used to be a life guard. I know how to swim well. I had a seizure a few weeks ago & will never go into a creek, lake or pool unless their are life guards. I was told no baths, showers only to avoid drowning during a seizure.
Chief Justice John Roberts suffered a seizure at his summer home in Maine on Monday, causing a fall that resulted in minor scrapes.
That's according to U.S. Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg, who says the Chief Justice had been running errands and was stepping off his boat onto a dock when he experienced the seizure. From Feb 11 2009.
Link to story
lastlib
(28,269 posts)(to quote a guy who talks to empty chairs....)
Michigan-Arizona
(762 posts)My mother was born in Australia, came here as a war bride, she remained an Australian right up until her passing. I was born here in the United States of America to one US born parent & a passport carrying Australian. Guess I should call my sister & brother's to tell them they are not legal citizen's either.
Cha
(319,079 posts)and still not a US citizen. No problem.
Michigan-Arizona
(762 posts)Cha
(319,079 posts)DryRain
(237 posts)that's the difference!
(Plus you didn't just get re-elected President for a second term with more votes than any other President in American History).
Michigan-Arizona
(762 posts)Was just going by their stupid term's of being a citizen which I'm sure there would be ton's of us.
reACTIONary
(7,162 posts)SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)caraher
(6,359 posts)DO IT!!!
Question: if you were a Democrat in the House would you vote for impeachment purely so we could nominate a successor to Roberts?
Any chance we can have Alito or Thomas or Scalia administer the oath of office instead? I'm not sure Roberts would lead my list of justices to replace (though obviously he's in the top tier!)...
democrattotheend
(12,011 posts)It would be tempting, but it would be a really bad precedent to impeach a justice who is not accused of any legal or ethical violations solely because I wanted a Democratic president to appoint his replacement. That would prevent us from ever having a stable judiciary again, because there would be nothing to stop impeachments every time the president's party controlled the House and Senate, which is not how the judicial system was designed to work.
The Inauguration is this month and it takes about two months to get through an impeachment. Besides, since the actual legal inauguration day is on Sunday, the actual official swearing in will take place on that day and the one in public will be "for show" which also makes it such that the Roberts screw up of the words from last time moot. But just wait til the birthers get wind of the "secret" swearing in part, they'll be howling to high heaven about that when they find out.
Cha
(319,079 posts)another SCJ?
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Move Justice Sotomayor to chief justice and name another young associate. Too bad it will never happen.
Cha
(319,079 posts)don't know they have a twofer! 
We People
(619 posts)if carried to their "logical conclusion" with the law (or lack of it). Like another DUer on this thread, I attribute this to the SCOTUS Obamacare decision. That's all.
Maybe now he knows how Democrats feel, with the insane RW attacking us as the enemy - but probably just wishful thinking on my part.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)a public speech he was giving a few years ago. Taitz tried to give him a ton of files about her case(s), he refused to accept them. The CJ told her he could not accept them and instructed her to give them to an aide.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)democrattotheend
(12,011 posts)Then President Obama would get to appoint his replacement, with a Democratic Senate to confirm.
yardwork
(69,364 posts)bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)Their criticisms are obviously nonsensical, but all impeaching him would do is give Obama another USSC appointment. So by all means, have at it.
scooter51
(1 post)That's it in a nutshell. These people are certifiable. Absolutely nuckin futz!
tanyev
(49,297 posts)struggle4progress
(126,157 posts)Impeaching Roberts is an excellent idea!
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Aren't there 8 justices left and 4 of them democratic friendly with 2 of them appointed by Obama
I'm sure one of the 4 dem justices would step in and do the trick.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)Calvin Coolidge was sworn in by his father, a notary public, after the death of Harding.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The oath can be administered by signing a paper, if that's how they would like to roll.
A Justice of the Peace would be just fine.
ReRe
(12,189 posts)...they either tell their IQ or their depth of moral depravity. I bet you in addition to the millions on the Mall come MLK/Inauguration Day, there will be a large contingent of security everywhere.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)quakerboy
(14,868 posts)I believe that John Roberts has already administered the oath of office to our president once. Why would doing it a second time make him impeachable all of a sudden?
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)
kentauros
(29,414 posts)It's better than the facepalm smilies!
longship
(40,416 posts)I am sure that wasn't the context of the original, but it works for me.
Wish I could rec it.
Solly Mack
(96,943 posts)Kablooie
(19,107 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Kablooie
(19,107 posts)JHB
(38,213 posts)I especially like the photo someone uploaded, with Doctor Who and a dinosaur, apparently the banana slicer is the most handy tool since the sonic screwdriver.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)....helps to balance out the stupidity of the product itself.
It's right up there with this:

Originally it was packaged like this:

Guess which sold more?
Betsy Ross
(3,150 posts)But not for the same reason. Replacing Justice Roberts with a choice by our current president: Priceless.
Mister Ed
(6,927 posts)underpants
(196,495 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,453 posts)That anyone down to a Justice of the Peace can do it?
Oh of course they don't...
GeorgeGist
(25,570 posts)birther
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Politicub
(12,328 posts)Historic NY
(40,037 posts)that should take them about 90days.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Xipe Totec
(44,558 posts)Even IF he was born in Kenya, which he was not, his mother was an American citizen, making him a United States citizen born abroad, eligible to become President, just like John McCain, who was born in Panama.
So even IF they could prove he was born in Kenya, which is impossible because he was born in Hawaii, they would STILL be thoroughly fucked.
Nine
(1,741 posts)Had Obama been born in Kenya to an American citizen mother, he would be a citizen but not a natural born citizen and therefore ineligible to the presidency.
Weirdly, these birthers don't seem to be making the usual claim that Obama was born in Kenya. Though that claim is completely wrong in fact, at least it doesn't represent a misunderstanding of what "natural born citizen" is. These particular birthers are claiming that Obama cannot be a natural born citizen in any case simply because his father was not a citizen, which is plainly incorrect.
Xipe Totec
(44,558 posts)Who was born in Panama, and the difference between a US citizen born abroad and a naturalized citizen.
The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term "natural born" citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship "by birth" or "at birth", either by being born "in" the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to alien parents; by being born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents; or by being born in other situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship "at birth".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause
SammyWinstonJack
(44,316 posts)davesliberal1977_gg
(22 posts)Feel free to make a fool of yourselves, birther nuts. In the end, it'll only end up destroying your credibility, as well as tarnishing the GOP's ever faltering reputation in the eyes of millions of Americans.
defacto7
(14,162 posts)that there must be a black hole of stupid where they finally cross an event horizon and disappear into oblivion from our perspective and enter another dimension where their stupid quantum particles congeal into the anti-peanut butter of God.
Please, let there be a black hole of stupid!
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Have At It! Booyah!
Jeevus
(61 posts)These people are ridiculous.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,681 posts)... and if that convinces them to impeach, then ...
YOU BIRTHERS WOULDN'T DARE IMPEACH JUSTICES THOMAS, SCALIA!!!!!!!
Heh.
dotymed
(5,610 posts)Scalia and Thomas impeached. I think we could find a real reason though. Especially with Scalia and Thomas. These two rw idiots have broken so many judicial rules and Thomas has broken the law on several occasions (felonies).
If nothing else, I hope Obama can appoint at least 2 SCOTUS "justices."
samsingh
(18,426 posts)muntrv
(14,505 posts)AMENDMENT XIV
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.
Note: Article I, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of the 14th amendment.
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
JanT
(229 posts)please proceed.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)flustered all of the time. Could the Birthers please secede and give the rest of us a F'en break from it all.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)rl6214
(8,142 posts)And doesn't screw up the oath.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Fuck!
olddad56
(5,732 posts)only Kenya wouldn't have them.