Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(166,801 posts)
Sat Jan 31, 2026, 11:13 AM 2 hrs ago

'Entirely inappropriate': Judge rejects Trump admin request to stay discovery in lawsuit over dismantling USAID

Source: Law & Crime

Jan 31st, 2026, 10:08 am


A federal judge has nixed a request by the Trump administration to stay discovery in, and quickly move forward with, an ongoing lawsuit over cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

In the underlying litigation, over two dozen pseudonymous current and former employees or contractors with USAID sued Elon Musk, arguing his then-position atop the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) violated the U.S. Constitution's Appointments Clause and the separation of powers doctrine.

In March 2025, the plaintiffs partially won a requested preliminary injunction barring Musk and DOGE from making any additional cuts at USAID without the "express authorization" of an authorized agency official. The judge also mused that efforts to diminish the agency's capacity constitute a "likely unconstitutional shutdown."

In August 2025, the defendants won a motion to dismiss as to claims against President Donald Trump – but was otherwise denied.

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/entirely-inappropriate-judge-rejects-trump-admin-request-to-stay-discovery-in-lawsuit-over-dismantling-usaid/



Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.576293/gov.uscourts.mdd.576293.196.0.pdf

REFERENCE - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143428501

There was a lawsuit filed a year ago (February 2025) against Musk, Rubio, & 45, et al, related to the dismantling of USAID, and the courts eventually dropped 45 off the list of defendants, but have so far left the rest, and the case continues. 45 is trying to get the whole thing dismissed and the judge is "Not so fast".

Case history available here - https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69636722/does-1-26-v-musk/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Entirely inappropriate': Judge rejects Trump admin request to stay discovery in lawsuit over dismantling USAID (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 2 hrs ago OP
'Entirely inappropriate' is an accurate descriptor for the fat orange imbecile wolfie001 2 hrs ago #1
Thank you for posting on this. CBHagman 1 hr ago #2
There is so much terrorizing and maelstrom going on BumRushDaShow 1 hr ago #3

CBHagman

(17,447 posts)
2. Thank you for posting on this.
Sat Jan 31, 2026, 12:01 PM
1 hr ago

I had missed this story but remain mindful of all the deaths this administration is causing by dismantling government agencies.

BumRushDaShow

(166,801 posts)
3. There is so much terrorizing and maelstrom going on
Sat Jan 31, 2026, 12:22 PM
1 hr ago

that it's easy for stories like this to get completely buried. But it is good to know there are still some reporters (and legal folks) still monitoring and updating the progress of some of these earliest cases that are still unresolved - particularly one like this one, that was filed almost a year ago.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Entirely inappropriate':...