Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(60,713 posts)
Mon Feb 2, 2026, 11:27 AM 8 hrs ago

How the Supreme Court Secretly Made Itself Even More Secretive

Source: NYT

In November of 2024, two weeks after voters returned President Donald Trump to office, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. summoned employees of the U.S. Supreme Court for an unusual announcement. Facing them in a grand conference room beneath ornate chandeliers, he requested they each sign a nondisclosure agreement promising to keep the court’s inner workings secret.

The chief justice acted after a series of unusual leaks of internal court documents, most notably of the decision overturning the right to abortion, and news reports about ethical lapses by the justices. Trust in the institution was languishing at a historic low. Debate was intensifying over whether the black box institution should be more transparent.

Instead, the chief justice tightened the court’s hold on information. Its employees have long been expected to stay silent about what they witness behind the scenes. But starting that autumn, in a move that has not been previously reported, the chief justice converted what was once a norm into a formal contract, according to five people familiar with the shift.

-snip-

The New York Times has not reviewed the new agreements. But people familiar with them said they appeared to be more forceful and understood them to threaten legal action if an employee revealed confidential information. Clerks and members of the court’s support staff signed them in 2024, and new arrivals have continued to do so, the people said.

-snip-

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/02/us/supreme-court-nondisclosure-agreements.html



...in a move that has not been previously reported...

This is major news, and I hope it will be widely reported.

Roberts needs to try to explain why SCOTUS suddenly needed tough NDAs after Trump was elected.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How the Supreme Court Secretly Made Itself Even More Secretive (Original Post) highplainsdem 8 hrs ago OP
Pedo protection court SheltieLover 8 hrs ago #1
Unconstitutional... pecosbob 8 hrs ago #2
Not good. They are entirely too secretive brer cat 8 hrs ago #3
Like most Non Disclosure Agreements, they shouldn't exist. mpcamb 6 hrs ago #4
Just throw out the fist amendment there Johnny.............what's next the masses will have to sign one also....... turbinetree 6 hrs ago #5
I heard about it at the time. eggplant 5 hrs ago #6

brer cat

(27,423 posts)
3. Not good. They are entirely too secretive
Mon Feb 2, 2026, 11:50 AM
8 hrs ago

and issuing too many unsigned orders. We already know they are corrupt.

turbinetree

(27,162 posts)
5. Just throw out the fist amendment there Johnny.............what's next the masses will have to sign one also.......
Mon Feb 2, 2026, 01:38 PM
6 hrs ago

just resign............and go away.........you and your ilk have done enough damage look no further that that fascist leading your party.........

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»How the Supreme Court Sec...