Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Scoop: US and Russia agree to observe New START nuclear pact after expiration
Source: msn/Axios
12h
The U.S. and Russia are closing in on a deal to continue to observe the expiring New START arms control treaty beyond its expiration on Thursday, three sources familiar with those talks tell Axios.
Two of the sources cautioned that the draft plan still needed approval from both presidents. An additional source confirmed that negotiations had been taking place over the past 24 hours in Abu Dhabi, but not that an agreement had been reached.
Why it matters: New START is the last major guardrail constraining the nuclear arsenals of the two countries that together hold some 85% of the world's warheads.
Driving the news: President Trump's envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner negotiated on New START with Russian officials on the sidelines of Ukraine talks in Abu Dhabi.
The treaty will still formally expire on Thursday, and the extension will not be legally formalized, a U.S. official said. But the parties have agreed to stick with its terms and negotiate toward a new agreement. "We agreed with Russia to operate in good faith and to start a discussion about ways it could be updated," a U.S. official said.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/scoop-us-and-russia-agree-to-observe-new-start-nuclear-pact-after-expiration/ar-AA1VJhSZ
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scoop: US and Russia agree to observe New START nuclear pact after expiration (Original Post)
BumRushDaShow
11 hrs ago
OP
Both the US and Russia have likely been cheating on the agreement for years...who knows the real number of nukes...
wcmagumba
11 hrs ago
#1
MaddowBlog-As the New START treaty expires, is Trump prepared for what happens next?
LetMyPeopleVote
11 hrs ago
#2
wcmagumba
(5,819 posts)1. Both the US and Russia have likely been cheating on the agreement for years...who knows the real number of nukes...
LetMyPeopleVote
(176,617 posts)2. MaddowBlog-As the New START treaty expires, is Trump prepared for what happens next?
The president said in July that New START is not an agreement you want expiring, adding that it would be a big problem for the world. Then it expired.
Seven months ago, Trump said that the New START treaty is ânot an agreement you want expiring,â adding that it would be âa big problem for the world.â
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-02-05T18:22:42.230Z
Yesterday, it expired.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/as-the-new-start-treaty-expires-is-trump-prepared-for-what-happens-next
The terms of the agreement lasted 10 years, though the policy included the option for a five-year extension, which Joe Biden embraced.
That kept the policy intact through Feb. 4, 2026. Its now Feb. 5, 2026. The Washington Post reported:
This wasnt inevitable. In fact, it was easy to predict the opposite outcome after Trump said last summer that New START is not an agreement you want expiring, adding that it would be a big problem for the world.....
Nevertheless, with the expiration of New START, what happens now? Georgia Cole, a research analyst at British foreign policy think tank Chatham House, told the Post that in the absence of the policy, the U.S. and Russia could build up their nuclear warheads and launchers unchecked.
This would raise the risk of miscalculation, accidents and unintended escalation especially in a crisis, she added. It would also encourage China to continue accelerating its nuclear buildup to reach parity.
Reuters reported that U.S. and Russian officials might yet agree to temporarily maintain the terms of New START despite its expiration, which would likely ease the fears of many international observers.
But in the meantime, amid growing uncertainty, many are wondering whether the nuclear arms control era is over, and the underlying question needs an answer from a White House that barely seems to care.
That kept the policy intact through Feb. 4, 2026. Its now Feb. 5, 2026. The Washington Post reported:
For decades, the worlds two largest nuclear arsenals have been constrained by a series of treaties. But that changed Thursday, when the last remaining nuclear arms limitation treaty between the United States and Russia, known as New START, expired.
Russia said in September it is willing to continue adhering to the central limitations of the treaty for at least another year, if Washington does likewise but the Trump administration has yet to officially respond to the offer.
This wasnt inevitable. In fact, it was easy to predict the opposite outcome after Trump said last summer that New START is not an agreement you want expiring, adding that it would be a big problem for the world.....
Nevertheless, with the expiration of New START, what happens now? Georgia Cole, a research analyst at British foreign policy think tank Chatham House, told the Post that in the absence of the policy, the U.S. and Russia could build up their nuclear warheads and launchers unchecked.
This would raise the risk of miscalculation, accidents and unintended escalation especially in a crisis, she added. It would also encourage China to continue accelerating its nuclear buildup to reach parity.
Reuters reported that U.S. and Russian officials might yet agree to temporarily maintain the terms of New START despite its expiration, which would likely ease the fears of many international observers.
But in the meantime, amid growing uncertainty, many are wondering whether the nuclear arms control era is over, and the underlying question needs an answer from a White House that barely seems to care.
Buddyzbuddy
(2,316 posts)3. Can't we just accidently on purpose let one or a thousand satellites
strategically fall on the Kremlin. That f*cker's been asking for it for awhile, now. Use Starlink and blame Leon.