FBI concluded Jeffrey Epstein wasn't running a sex trafficking ring for powerful men, files show
Source: AP
By MICHAEL R. SISAK, DAVID B. CARUSO and LARRY NEUMEISTER
Updated 9:30 AM CST, February 8, 2026
NEW YORK (AP) The FBI pored over Jeffrey Epsteins bank records and emails. It searched his homes. It spent years interviewing his victims and examining his connections to some of the worlds most influential people.
But while investigators collected ample proof that Epstein sexually abused underage girls, they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men, an Associated Press review of internal Justice Department records shows.
Videos and photos seized from Epsteins homes in New York, Florida and the Virgin Islands didnt depict victims being abused or implicate anyone else in his crimes, a prosecutor wrote in one 2025 memo.
An examination of Epsteins financial records, including payments he made to entities linked to influential figures in academia, finance and global diplomacy, found no connection to criminal activity, said another internal memo in 2019.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/jeffrey-epstein-client-list-sex-trafficking-049c96080a2ca2c12c84ac506437e50b
UpInArms
(54,427 posts)Anything that comes from this maladminstration is a lie
FakeNoose
(40,739 posts)Asking for a country....
underpants
(195,588 posts)Ritabert
(2,154 posts)._.
(1,768 posts)Not your fathers FBI..
quaint
(4,808 posts)MLWR
(897 posts)just want to "spend more time with their families."
patphil
(8,841 posts)The victims tell a different story.
raccoon
(32,283 posts)AZJonnie
(3,219 posts)I could lay out the evidence that underpins this analysis (it doesn't 'prove' it, but suggests it), but it would annoy many people so I won't. I hope you'll believe me when I say it's honestly well-considered, and that I would be more than happy to jump on the bandwagon to believe what everyone else does, if the evidence ever truly warrants it.
A lot of the reasons behind this though I will say stem from the testimonies in Maxwell's 2022 trial, which I consider to offer the highest level of credibility, due to everyone being under oath in a closely-watched federal criminal trial
OTOH, I also strongly suspect he and Brunel were recruiting models and actresses (who were 18+) from all over the world to come and party at Epstein Island and elsewhere, and I'm sure a lot of what happened there is rightly called "sex trafficking", so I disagree with the headline, and think the word "minors" should be part of it.
I think he was trafficking young women, and privately abusing minor girls, rather than sharing them with his rich buddies, with the likely exception of Virginia Guiffre.
In the public imagination, IMHO, these two things (abusing minors, trafficking 18-25 year olds to his rich buddies) have become conflated into one storyline, but I don't think that version of the story is particularly accurate.
Let the flames begin.
2naSalit
(100,995 posts)Are there any female humans in your life? Have you exposed any of them to your 'theory'?
All I can say is, you must not have been paying much attention to detail.
AZJonnie
(3,219 posts)Here's the thing. If you've approached everything you'd think of as "evidence" in this case pre-judged and viewed through the lens of "I'm absolutely positive Epstein was trafficking minors to his rich buddies", I completely understand how and why many people (yourself included) think there is mountains of evidence to confirm it. I get it. I get why you think I sound crazy or blind or whatever you're getting at. I do.
But this article suggests I'm not as stupid and/or crazy and/or blind as you're alluding to, otherwise probably the FBI (which includes 8 years of Obama's DoJ, and 4 of Biden's) wouldn't be thinking similarly.
niyad
(130,503 posts)bluestarone
(21,643 posts)Don't ever hire YOU as a lawyer.
AZJonnie
(3,219 posts)usonian
(24,134 posts)Bullshit.
oldmanlynn
(795 posts)Obviously, theyre taking something from the DOJ thats been whitewashed and reporting on it as if its all true
Pas-de-Calais
(10,273 posts)catrose
(5,348 posts)SunSeeker
(57,888 posts)Because they didn't interview anyone!
It's easy to find nothing if you look for nothing.
malthaussen
(18,481 posts)After all, they are the agency that has consistently blown off the threat of RW terrorism for decades. They are the agency that concluded that the student protest movement was overrun with Commies. They are the agency that concluded the Civil Rights movement was overrun with Commies. I could go on, but the bottom line is this: the FBI is not infallible, especially when it comes to the crimes of wealthy white men.
-- Mal
mdbl
(8,282 posts)malthaussen
(18,481 posts)yaesu
(9,125 posts)Vinca
(53,565 posts)purr-rat beauty
(1,091 posts)They truly are that stupid to think we are that stupid
Escape
(407 posts)...Their exact names and positions in their departments.
