Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(108,692 posts)
Sun Feb 8, 2026, 11:38 AM 3 hrs ago

FBI concluded Jeffrey Epstein wasn't running a sex trafficking ring for powerful men, files show

Source: AP

By MICHAEL R. SISAK, DAVID B. CARUSO and LARRY NEUMEISTER
Updated 9:30 AM CST, February 8, 2026

NEW YORK (AP) — The FBI pored over Jeffrey Epstein’s bank records and emails. It searched his homes. It spent years interviewing his victims and examining his connections to some of the world’s most influential people.

But while investigators collected ample proof that Epstein sexually abused underage girls, they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men, an Associated Press review of internal Justice Department records shows.

Videos and photos seized from Epstein’s homes in New York, Florida and the Virgin Islands didn’t depict victims being abused or implicate anyone else in his crimes, a prosecutor wrote in one 2025 memo.

An examination of Epstein’s financial records, including payments he made to entities linked to influential figures in academia, finance and global diplomacy, found no connection to criminal activity, said another internal memo in 2019.



Read more: https://apnews.com/article/jeffrey-epstein-client-list-sex-trafficking-049c96080a2ca2c12c84ac506437e50b

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FBI concluded Jeffrey Epstein wasn't running a sex trafficking ring for powerful men, files show (Original Post) Omaha Steve 3 hrs ago OP
What load of bullshit UpInArms 3 hrs ago #1
Was this before or after Bill Barr destroyed the evidence? FakeNoose 3 hrs ago #2
Captives don't have to be told what's expected of them. underpants 3 hrs ago #3
Whitewashing at its finest. Ritabert 3 hrs ago #4
Seriously? ._. 3 hrs ago #5
It's J. Edgar Hoover's on steroids. quaint 1 hr ago #19
So, I guess all those politicians in Europe who are resigning from their posts MLWR 3 hrs ago #6
Just one more example of the FBI's lack of credibility under Trump. patphil 3 hrs ago #7
It's now official that there ain't a cow in Texas. raccoon 3 hrs ago #8
That is what I've also concluded after carefully watching the whole story unfold AZJonnie 3 hrs ago #9
I have to ask... 2naSalit 3 hrs ago #11
Yes I have, and yes I have paid a considerable attention to details, though I may've missed something AZJonnie 1 hr ago #23
Did you forget the sarcsm thingy? niyad 2 hrs ago #14
First thing i thought of after reading your post bluestarone 1 hr ago #16
Yes, I suppose I'd be as terrible at it as 17 years worth of federal prosecutors across 5 POTUS terms (nt) AZJonnie 1 hr ago #24
And it don't rain in Indianapolis in the summertime usonian 3 hrs ago #10
I can't believe the AP would report that oldmanlynn 2 hrs ago #12
Bovine Excrement! Pas-de-Calais 2 hrs ago #13
Not Borowitz or The Onion catrose 2 hrs ago #15
The same FBI that found no evidence of sexual abuse by Bret Kavanaugh. SunSeeker 1 hr ago #17
The FBI might very well have concluded this. malthaussen 1 hr ago #18
Sounds more like they aren't incorruptible. mdbl 1 hr ago #20
I won't quibble. n/t malthaussen 1 hr ago #21
This is the type of BS we can expect from the newly revamped Fascist Bureau of Intimidation. nt yaesu 1 hr ago #22
Let me guess. It was just a different kind of chapter of the Boy Scouts and they were working on a merit badge. Vinca 58 min ago #25
Wait, what? They're gonna push this bullshit? purr-rat beauty 41 min ago #26
We need the names of the FBI people who said this... Escape 6 min ago #27
Sure, Jan. Scrivener7 1 min ago #28

MLWR

(897 posts)
6. So, I guess all those politicians in Europe who are resigning from their posts
Sun Feb 8, 2026, 11:57 AM
3 hrs ago

just want to "spend more time with their families."

AZJonnie

(3,219 posts)
9. That is what I've also concluded after carefully watching the whole story unfold
Sun Feb 8, 2026, 12:13 PM
3 hrs ago

I could lay out the evidence that underpins this analysis (it doesn't 'prove' it, but suggests it), but it would annoy many people so I won't. I hope you'll believe me when I say it's honestly well-considered, and that I would be more than happy to jump on the bandwagon to believe what everyone else does, if the evidence ever truly warrants it.

A lot of the reasons behind this though I will say stem from the testimonies in Maxwell's 2022 trial, which I consider to offer the highest level of credibility, due to everyone being under oath in a closely-watched federal criminal trial

OTOH, I also strongly suspect he and Brunel were recruiting models and actresses (who were 18+) from all over the world to come and party at Epstein Island and elsewhere, and I'm sure a lot of what happened there is rightly called "sex trafficking", so I disagree with the headline, and think the word "minors" should be part of it.

I think he was trafficking young women, and privately abusing minor girls, rather than sharing them with his rich buddies, with the likely exception of Virginia Guiffre.

In the public imagination, IMHO, these two things (abusing minors, trafficking 18-25 year olds to his rich buddies) have become conflated into one storyline, but I don't think that version of the story is particularly accurate.

Let the flames begin.

2naSalit

(100,995 posts)
11. I have to ask...
Sun Feb 8, 2026, 12:31 PM
3 hrs ago

Are there any female humans in your life? Have you exposed any of them to your 'theory'?

All I can say is, you must not have been paying much attention to detail.

AZJonnie

(3,219 posts)
23. Yes I have, and yes I have paid a considerable attention to details, though I may've missed something
Sun Feb 8, 2026, 02:29 PM
1 hr ago

Here's the thing. If you've approached everything you'd think of as "evidence" in this case pre-judged and viewed through the lens of "I'm absolutely positive Epstein was trafficking minors to his rich buddies", I completely understand how and why many people (yourself included) think there is mountains of evidence to confirm it. I get it. I get why you think I sound crazy or blind or whatever you're getting at. I do.

But this article suggests I'm not as stupid and/or crazy and/or blind as you're alluding to, otherwise probably the FBI (which includes 8 years of Obama's DoJ, and 4 of Biden's) wouldn't be thinking similarly.

oldmanlynn

(795 posts)
12. I can't believe the AP would report that
Sun Feb 8, 2026, 12:49 PM
2 hrs ago

Obviously, they’re taking something from the DOJ that’s been whitewashed and reporting on it as if it’s all true

SunSeeker

(57,888 posts)
17. The same FBI that found no evidence of sexual abuse by Bret Kavanaugh.
Sun Feb 8, 2026, 01:38 PM
1 hr ago

Because they didn't interview anyone!

It's easy to find nothing if you look for nothing.

malthaussen

(18,481 posts)
18. The FBI might very well have concluded this.
Sun Feb 8, 2026, 01:40 PM
1 hr ago

After all, they are the agency that has consistently blown off the threat of RW terrorism for decades. They are the agency that concluded that the student protest movement was overrun with Commies. They are the agency that concluded the Civil Rights movement was overrun with Commies. I could go on, but the bottom line is this: the FBI is not infallible, especially when it comes to the crimes of wealthy white men.

-- Mal

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FBI concluded Jeffrey Eps...