Trump administration fails to secure indictment in connection with Democrats involved in 'illegal orders' video
Source: NBC
WASHINGTON The Trump administration tried and failed on Tuesday to secure an indictment in connection with a video featuring six Democratic lawmakers urging members of the military and intelligence communities not to comply with unlawful orders, three sources familiar with the matter told NBC News.
It was not clear how many of the lawmakers the Trump administration attempted to indict, or if the failed attempt will be addressed in a future court hearing.
The indictment pursued by the office of U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro is the latest example of the Justice Department targeting the presidents perceived political opponents. The government attorneys assigned to the case are political appointees, not career Justice Department prosecutors, according to a source familiar with the investigation.
A Justice Department spokesman and a spokesman for the U.S. Attorneys Office for the District of Columbia did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday night.
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/doj-fails-secure-indictment-democrats-involved-illegal-orders-video-rcna258385
BumRushDaShow
(167,355 posts)(NYT had a breaking on this)
underpants
(195,638 posts)I cant find the article but there were 9 last September alone.
BumRushDaShow
(167,355 posts)underpants
(195,638 posts)👍
BumRushDaShow
(167,355 posts)the same is repeating nationwide.
wolfie001
(7,391 posts)Repulsive harridan.
Deuxcents
(26,105 posts)CaptainTruth
(8,101 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(17,886 posts)How long before this Trumpedo loving loser is tossed under the bus by Trumpedo?
riversedge
(80,095 posts)underpants
(195,638 posts)I think this is at least 15 failed indictments by her office.
I cant find the article but there were 9 last September alone.
mdbl
(8,323 posts)I'm glad there's still some people left that do the right thing. Now will the court sanction miss drunk for wasting tax payer money on this?
MuirHero
(94 posts)Skittles
(170,302 posts)this was all bullshit red meat for the moronic MAGAts
jgmiller
(678 posts)You almost never hear of them not getting an indictment and she's up to at least 4 isn't she? That has to be a record. Oh and lets not forget somehow managing to lose a misdemeaner jury trial. Somewhere some law professor is preparing a lecture using her as a cautionary tale.
MLWR
(910 posts)underpants
(195,638 posts)I think this is at least 15 failed indictments by her office.
I cant find the article but there were 9 last September alone.
Fil1957
(631 posts)joanbarnes
(2,106 posts)J_William_Ryan
(3,418 posts)the Trump regime attempting to use the power of the state to silence political opponents, in violation of the First Amendment.
The criminal Trump regime is precisely why the Framers ratified the First Amendment.
The Democratic lawmakers did nothing to justify an indictment; unlike Trump, they violated no laws.
ProudMNDemocrat
(20,693 posts)What is written cannot be unwritten just because it tells the truth.
The US Constitution falls into the same category. The 6 on the SCoTUS need to get that through their thick heads as well.
travelingthrulife
(4,847 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(177,018 posts)The rejection was a remarkable rebuke, suggesting that ordinary citizens did not believe that the lawmakers had committed any crimes.
Link to tweet
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/10/us/politics/trump-democrats-illegal-orders-pirro.html?unlocked_article_code=1.LVA.6CKn.AKtD2kERP9jk&smid=nytcore-ios-share
It was remarkable that the U.S. attorneys office in Washington led by Jeanine Pirro, a longtime ally of Mr. Trumps authorized prosecutors to go into a grand jury and ask for an indictment of the six members of Congress, all of whom had served in the military or the nations spy agencies.
But it was even more remarkable that a group of ordinary citizens sitting on the grand jury in Federal District Court in Washington forcefully rejected Mr. Trumps bid to label their expression of dissent as a criminal act warranting prosecution.
The move to charge the lawmakers among them, Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona and Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan was, by any measure, an extraordinary attempt by Trump appointees to politicize the criminal justice system even for a Justice Department that has repeatedly shattered norms of independence from the White House and followed Mr. Trumps directives to prosecute his adversaries......
President Trump is using the F.B.I. as a tool to intimidate and harass members of Congress, the four House members who took part in the video said in a joint statement. No amount of intimidation or harassment will ever stop us from doing our jobs and honoring our Constitution.
Mr. Kelly is also facing a separate investigation by the Pentagon into what military officials described as serious allegations of misconduct.
LetMyPeopleVote
(177,018 posts)If these fers think that theyre going to intimidate us and threaten and bully me into silence
they have another thing coming, one Democrat said.
Dems enraged after Trumpâs DOJ targeted veterans with charges of seditious conspiracy - MS NOW
— (@oc88.bsky.social) 2026-02-11T16:55:16.817Z
apple.news/AwXl5tcTUQx2...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/dems-enraged-after-trumps-doj-targeted-veterans-with-charges-of-seditious-conspiracy
If it seems as if the phrase has been coming up more frequently in recent months, its not your imagination. Donald Trumps Justice Department has run into no bill setbacks repeatedly of late, in cases ranging from former FBI Director James Comey to New York Attorney General Letitia James to Sean Dunn (better known as the sandwich guy).
The latest example, however, is arguably the most dramatic: MS NOW reported that a federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., has declined to indict at least two Democratic senators Arizonas Mark Kelly and Michigans Elissa Slotkin on charges of seditious conspiracy......
Thats precisely what happened. As The New York Times summarized:
It was remarkable that the U.S. attorneys office in Washington led by Jeanine Pirro, a longtime ally of Mr. Trumps authorized prosecutors to go into a grand jury and ask for an indictment. But it was even more remarkable that a group of ordinary citizens sitting on the grand jury in Federal District Court in Washington forcefully rejected Mr. Trumps bid to label their expression of dissent as a criminal act warranting prosecution.
Thats certainly correct, though Id add that its also remarkable to note the crime that Trumps DOJ accused the Democratic lawmakers of committing: Seditious conspiracy is a serious felony charge thats rarely pursued. The idea that members of Congress crossed that line, and effectively conspired to undermine the authority of the government by reminding service members to follow the law and reject illegal orders, is insane......
Democratic Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado, a decorated Army veteran who served in both Iraq and Afghanistan, was even more candid. If these fers think that theyre going to intimidate us and threaten and bully me into silence, and theyre going to go after political opponents and get us to back down, they have another thing coming, Crow said. The tide is turning.
As for the partys leadership, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries was also unreserved, declaring in a written statement: The Grand Jury upheld and honored the Constitution, doing what Donald Trump and his corrupt Republican sycophants lack the character to do. The attempt to indict Members of Congress for exercising their constitutionally-protected First Amendment rights is another shameful example of the cancerous rot that engulfs the Trump administration.
The New York Democrat concluded, Donald Trump, Jeanine Pirro and the corrupt political hacks at the Department of Justice will not silence or intimidate us. Every attempt to weaponize the criminal justice system will only strengthen our resolve as we work to end the National nightmare that extreme MAGA Republicans are inflicting on the country. They will all be held accountable for their lawlessness.
LetMyPeopleVote
(177,018 posts)The DOJ could not get even one of the 23 grand jurors to agree to indict this "ham sandwich" of a case.
No grand jurors found the Trump DOJ met low probable cause threshold in failed indictment of Democratic lawmakers
— Ryan J. Reilly âpaints a vivid and urgent portrait of⦠disarrayâ (@ryanjreilly.com) 2026-02-11T15:46:05.188Z
www.nbcnews.com/politics/tru...
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/live-blog/trump-bondi-epstein-congress-netanyahu-iran-dhs-ice-poll-live-updates-rcna257992#rcrd99859
Its exceedingly rare for a federal grand jury to reject prosecutors attempts to secure an indictment, since the process is stacked in the governments favor. Federal grand juries need a minimum of 16 members to have a quorum, and they max out at 23 members. Just 12 grand jurors need to agree that the government had probable cause to indict, a threshold much lower than the unanimous beyond a reasonable doubt standard that a petit jury needs to convict.
In 2016, the Justice Department investigated more than 151,000 suspects, but grand juries returned just six no bills, per DOJ statistics. The vast majority of assistant U.S. attorneys will go their entire careers without being rejected by a grand jury like this. As NBC News previously reported, the lawyers who attempted to bring the case are political appointees, not career prosecutors.
Its unclear if the office of U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro will push forward and try to indict the Democratic members again.
DJ Synikus Makisimus
(1,263 posts)they OWNED the libs (at least for a hot FOX News minute) AND got them to spend what was probably a lot on legal fees. Now they can stir outrage among the MAGAts over "liberal judges."
