US Forest Service to move headquarters from Washington DC to Salt Lake City
Source: The Guardian
Tue 31 Mar 2026 21.16 EDT
Last modified on Wed 1 Apr 2026 08.36 EDT
The Trump administration will move the US Forest Service headquarters from Washington DC to Salt Lake City and shut down its regional offices, the agriculture department has announced. The announcement sets in motion a controversial reorganization for the countrys second-largest federal land management agency that Trump officials have planned since last year.
The move, which the USDA touted as a commonsense approach, recalls the first Trump administrations chaotic attempt to relocate the Bureau of Land Management from Washington DC to Colorado, first announced in 2019. The agency lost nearly 90% of its Washington-based staff, who declined to move only for the BLM to return toWashington after Joe Biden took office.
Agriculture department officials described the move as a way to bring the administration of the USFS, which manages nearly 200 million acres of federal land, closer to its holdings, which are concentrated in western states. Under the new state-based model, the agency will be run by 15 directors overseeing one or more states instead of the current structure based on regions.
This is about building a Forest Service that is nimble, efficient, effective and closer to the forests and communities it serves, USFS chief Tom Schultz wrote in a statement. Effective stewardship and active management are achieved on the ground, where forests and communities are found not just behind a desk in the capital. About 90% of the USFS workforce already works outside the capital, according to the news outlet Mountain Journal. Conservationists view the plan as the latest in a series of steps the Trump administration has taken to weaken public land agencies.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/31/us-forest-service-washington-dc-salt-lake-city
Washington D.C. is CAPITAL of the United States of America and is the SEAT of the U.S. government (and its agencies).
THAT is why the "headquarters" offices are there (and in the surrounding MD/VA area).
They are conflating the "field" offices with the "main" offices.
So instead of 10 "regions" with 10 "regional directors", they are basically going to create 15 regions (but not calling them that), adding MORE GS-1000 layers at the top level. How is that "efficient" or cost effective?
Botany
(77,323 posts)End of story.
Irish_Dem
(81,266 posts)Putin keeps winning.
New Breed Leader
(928 posts)Farmer-Rick
(12,667 posts)The poorly written article needed help. Maybe the writer got too much AI help.
As a farmer, I work with the local field office here a lot. So this BS about being closer to forests and communities they serve is crap. They serve and work with a lot of communities, even communities in the East.
BumRushDaShow
(169,752 posts)with reporters who work around the world including the U.S.
I didn't see much wrong with the article and basically know about this whole bullshit thing about "reorganizations" because my own Department (HHS) and agency had gone through many reorgs.
It's just disruptive and is basically gets drowned in overused jargon from training courses that focus on "reinvention"
angrychair
(12,284 posts)By decentralizing the government functions it allows for easier control and embezzlement of funds and bribery.
not fooled
(6,680 posts)Home of some of the most rabid Forest Service and conservation haters. Ground central for radical anti-environmental LDS types.
wolfie001
(7,667 posts)fat racist piece of shit. And all the fuckers that voted for him.