Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(70,079 posts)
Sat Apr 11, 2026, 12:49 AM Yesterday

US appeals court declares 158-year-old home distilling ban unconstitutional

Last edited Sat Apr 11, 2026, 08:13 AM - Edit history (1)

Source: Reuters

US appeals court declares 158-year-old home distilling ban unconstitutional

By Jonathan Stempel
April 10, 2026 5:50 PM EDT * Updated 6 hours ago

April 10 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Friday declared unconstitutional a nearly 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling, calling it an unnecessary and improper means for ​Congress to exercise its power to tax.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of ‌Appeals in New Orleans ruled in favor of the nonprofit Hobby Distillers Association and four of its 1,300 members. ... They argued that people should be free to distill spirits at home, whether as ​a hobby or for personal consumption including, in one instance, to create ​an apple-pie-vodka recipe.

The ban was part of a law passed during ⁠Reconstruction in July 1868, in part to thwart liquor tax evasion, and subjected violators ​to up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

Writing for a three-judge panel, ​Circuit Judge Edith Hollan Jones said the ban actually reduced tax revenue by preventing distilling in the first place, unlike laws that regulated the manufacture and labeling of distilled spirits on which ​the government could collect taxes.

{snip}

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-appeals-court-declares-158-year-old-home-distilling-ban-unconstitutional-2026-04-10/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US appeals court declares 158-year-old home distilling ban unconstitutional (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Yesterday OP
Make America Methanol-poisoned Again RockRaven Yesterday #1
Home distillers will not put methanol in their product Mysterian 18 hrs ago #9
Great! Another retirement hobby. BidenRocks Yesterday #2
Moonshine moonshine to quench the devil's thirst . . . NBachers Yesterday #3
"Bathtub Gin" Martin68 20 hrs ago #4
My cousin's grandfather was a N.J. bootlegger for the mob. Grandpa made the stuff and a small truck would come and pick 3Hotdogs 20 hrs ago #5
I predict a run on 50-pound bags of sugar in Franklin County, Virginia. mahatmakanejeeves 19 hrs ago #6
Hell yeah! Mysterian 19 hrs ago #7
Check out this guy wolfie001 18 hrs ago #10
The owners of US liquor are 100% tRUMP humpers wolfie001 18 hrs ago #8
Canadian is better dave99 16 hrs ago #11
Cheers to that! wolfie001 15 hrs ago #12
because they distill it in their aboots. Wonder Why 11 hrs ago #14
Not as simple as home brewing Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 13 hrs ago #13

Mysterian

(6,544 posts)
9. Home distillers will not put methanol in their product
Sat Apr 11, 2026, 10:31 AM
18 hrs ago

This decision only impacts people distilling for their own consumption.

3Hotdogs

(15,401 posts)
5. My cousin's grandfather was a N.J. bootlegger for the mob. Grandpa made the stuff and a small truck would come and pick
Sat Apr 11, 2026, 08:52 AM
20 hrs ago

it. up. Once a month, a Cadillac would come to the house. Grandpa would get in and come back wth a smile on his face.

Fast forward to the 50's. Grandpa was gone, but Grandma would make whisky for Christmas gifts for her friends.

From the time I was 12 until she died a few years later, I got small bottles of whiskey for Christmas. One was always Anisette and the other was Streig. I don't know the mixings that made Streig but the anisette was always enjoyed.

mahatmakanejeeves

(70,079 posts)
6. I predict a run on 50-pound bags of sugar in Franklin County, Virginia.
Sat Apr 11, 2026, 09:16 AM
19 hrs ago

Maybe this ruling applies only to the 5th Circuit. If the other circuits disagree, we're off to the SC, are we not?

Mysterian

(6,544 posts)
7. Hell yeah!
Sat Apr 11, 2026, 09:27 AM
19 hrs ago

I agree with this decision. No good reason I can't make some gourmet shine for myself.

wolfie001

(7,756 posts)
10. Check out this guy
Sat Apr 11, 2026, 10:31 AM
18 hrs ago

He also shows you how to sanitize the process in another short video. I saved both. Just a bottle of juice and a packet of magic. 10 minutes.

wolfie001

(7,756 posts)
8. The owners of US liquor are 100% tRUMP humpers
Sat Apr 11, 2026, 10:28 AM
18 hrs ago

I'm not shedding a single tear. I may purchase some Canadian liquor though.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US appeals court declares...