Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(171,482 posts)
Fri Apr 17, 2026, 07:51 PM Apr 17

White House eyes alleged Utah scandal as GOP frets about redistricting loss

Source: CBS News

April 17, 2026 / 2:08 PM EDT


White House officials are closely monitoring an alleged Utah scandal, leaning on Republicans there to delve further into ethics concerns about a relationship between two key players in a high-profile gerrymandering case, sources told CBS News.

It's another twist in an ongoing battle over Utah's court-ordered congressional map that made a GOP-majority district much friendlier for Democrats, and a new tactic in the Trump administration's push to hold Republicans' slim majority in the U.S. House.

Lawmakers in the state legislature are asking questions about Utah Supreme Court Justice Diana Hagen's relationship with David Reymann, the chief counsel for the League of Women Voters of Utah, who was one of the plaintiff's attorneys asserting Republicans' proposed congressional maps were illegal.

Hagen wrote the opinion in a unanimous 2024 ruling that found GOP lawmakers had overstepped by changing Proposition 4, which prohibits gerrymandering.

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/white-house-alleged-utah-scandal-gop-redistricting/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House eyes alleged Utah scandal as GOP frets about redistricting loss (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Apr 17 OP
It is to laugh. Republican screaming about conflict of interest when yourout Apr 17 #1
Is that all they've got? Really? The decision was unanimous. paleotn Apr 17 #2
Little test cases... PuraVidaDreamin Apr 18 #3

yourout

(8,860 posts)
1. It is to laugh. Republican screaming about conflict of interest when
Fri Apr 17, 2026, 08:06 PM
Apr 17

They have yet to find one they weren't willing to overlook in their own party.

paleotn

(22,555 posts)
2. Is that all they've got? Really? The decision was unanimous.
Fri Apr 17, 2026, 08:13 PM
Apr 17

Perhaps someone should explain that word to them. Unanimous. Oh! And they were all appointed by Republicans.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House eyes alleged ...