Waltz says US pushing for UN resolution on Iranian actions in Strait of Hormuz
Source: The Hill
05/10/26 11:11 AM ET
U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations (UN) Mike Waltz on Sunday reiterated his push for the international coalitions security council to pass a resolution condemning the Iranian governments restrictions on shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Tuesday that the Trump administration, alongside Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Qatar, drafted a UN Security Council Resolution to defend freedom of navigation in the waterway, through which the Islamic Republic has restricted shipping since the U.S. and Israel launched the war on Feb. 28.
No country can do what Iran is doing in international waterways, Waltz told host Martha Raddatz on ABCs This Week.
We cannot have a conflict between two countries, whether its over a border, resources, a nuclear program, where one side responds by holding the entire worlds economies hostage, by throwing sea mines out in international waterways, he later said. Can you imagine if a country did that in the Strait of Gibraltar or the [Strait] of Malacca?
Read more: https://thehill.com/policy/international/5871598-waltz-un-strait-hormuz-iran/
Except when we do it in the Gulf of Mexico or the Caribbean or Eastern Pacific, "double-tapping" fishing boats to enure they are completely obliterated.
WSHazel
(815 posts)The world is sick of the U.S.
EX500rider
(12,730 posts)... not to mention fertilizer and other items Etc
And allowing a country block an international waterway is a bad president to start.
dave99
(234 posts)any US ship that targets a China Flagged ship will sink the United States.
EX500rider
(12,730 posts)And having a Chinese flag doesn't magically protect oil tankers from sea mines.
And the straights can't get swept for mines until Iran stops firing at vessels.
dave99
(234 posts)EX500rider
(12,730 posts)And the Chinese military is only effective very close to China, they have almost no ability to project worldwide like the US does.
dave99
(234 posts)WSHazel
(815 posts)He is looking for a UN resolution to blame it on Iran. I don't know why anyone would go along with this without an ironclad promise for the U.S. to end its blockade.
EX500rider
(12,730 posts)Or certain countries vessels they allowed or paid them the bribe they wanted.
And the middle of the Straits are in international waters so they have no basis for that
I don't think letting them export oil and no one else was a good idea so it's either blockaded for everybody or nobody.
WSHazel
(815 posts)So no, Iran did not start with the closing of the Strait.
Progressives need to stop repeating MAGA framing.
EX500rider
(12,730 posts)When Japan attacked the US didn't start trying to sink Canadian vessels.
Known nationalities of ships attacked, seized, or harassed by Iran include India, Barbados, Liberia, Panama, Greece, Marshall Islands, Malta, Singapore etc
sakabatou
(46,300 posts)Oh wait...
agingdem
(8,947 posts)isn't that the same NATO Trump called a "paper tiger"/demanded the organization pay their "fair share"/threatened withdrawal?.........and now Trump clown Waltz is begging the "no relevance" NATO to condemn the Iranian government's restrictions on shipping through the Strait of Hormuz when there were no restrictions prior to Trump's disastrous vanity war...Insanity rules!!
muriel_volestrangler
(106,521 posts)ChicagoTeamster
(1,209 posts)Trump is the one blockading the strait by not letting any shipping from Iranian ports through (unless it's for China or Russia).