Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,291 posts)
Tue May 19, 2026, 10:13 AM Yesterday

Ketanji Brown Jackson says Supreme Court risks being seen as political after voting rights decision

Source: AP

Updated 10:46 PM EDT, May 18, 2026


WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said Monday that the Supreme Court risks being seen as political in the wake of a major voting rights decision.

She spoke after writing a solo dissent from the court’s decision allowing Louisiana to move quickly to use new maps after the court’s conservative majority struck down a majority-Black district and weakened the Voting Rights Act.

“Public confidence is really all the judiciary has,” she said at a talk before the American Law Institute in Washington, D.C. “Everyone believes the court system is outside the political sphere. I think that means it’s incumbent on us to do things, to act in ways, that shore up public confidence,” she said.

Polling has shown public trust in the Supreme Court at historic lows in recent years, and Chief Justice John Roberts has separately bemoaned a perception that the justices are “political actors,” calling it a misunderstanding.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-voting-rights-justice-jackson-d9971fd19f7a63c841e7890b89e104f6

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ketanji Brown Jackson says Supreme Court risks being seen as political after voting rights decision (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP
RISKS??? Lokee11 Yesterday #1
Did she really use the word "risks?" Festivito Yesterday #21
Exactly my post! BidenRocks Yesterday #22
In her defense... BaronChocula Yesterday #23
That line needs to be crossed more frequently. travelingthrulife 18 hrs ago #32
Understatement of the year... sop Yesterday #2
Thats rather mild considering how it looks to outsiders. Srkdqltr Yesterday #3
No shit Ketanji Brown Jackson suegeo Yesterday #4
Me too. That was a major nail in the coffin. Amaryllis Yesterday #16
Political Whip-poor-will Yesterday #5
It already is political. SamuelAdams Yesterday #6
Ya think? Ocelot II Yesterday #7
In other news: water is wet, grass is green... NT mwooldri Yesterday #8
Oh really. nt doc03 Yesterday #9
Does she remember Roe? TBF Yesterday #10
I feel so bad for Justice Jackson, she never deserved to be thrown in with THEM! FakeNoose Yesterday #11
Risks being seen?????? Quanto Magnus Yesterday #12
WTaF, Risks!?!?!? BradBo Yesterday #13
Sorry, Ketanji. It's a foregone conclusion. Baitball Blogger Yesterday #14
Risks being seen, my ass, it is political. republianmushroom Yesterday #15
R I S K S ???????????????????????? Historic NY Yesterday #17
No risk about it at all. ananda Yesterday #18
"Risks" ? "Seen" ? C Moon Yesterday #19
Sooner. Gore v Bush. nt BWdem4life Yesterday #28
Exactly what I was thinking. Karma13612 Yesterday #29
Well, at least she seems 'concerned'. Talitha Yesterday #20
Of course it's obvious; but I tend to agree w poster Baronchocula that she's being. .. electric_blue68 Yesterday #24
That's tippy-toeing around the issue already in everyone's face mdbl Yesterday #25
Risks??? That's so 1999 awesomerwb1 Yesterday #26
Hitler risked looking like a bad guy. Klarkashton Yesterday #27
That ship has sailed, Justice Brown Jackson choie 23 hrs ago #30
call me in 2001. pansypoo53219 20 hrs ago #31
It's been seen like that since Bush v. Gore sakabatou 18 hrs ago #33

Festivito

(13,918 posts)
21. Did she really use the word "risks?"
Tue May 19, 2026, 12:39 PM
Yesterday

I know it's in the article but I almost can't believe that she actually said it.

BaronChocula

(4,758 posts)
23. In her defense...
Tue May 19, 2026, 01:09 PM
Yesterday

Though it sounds like she's mitigating to the point of neutrality, she's crossing a line that doesn't get crossed at the SC. As a matter of their own tradition, they don't say things about each other that are obvious to the rest of us. They may have it out in wordy decisions, but they don't typically call each other out publicly. She opened a can of worms in what seems like a plainly obvious statement.

FakeNoose

(42,424 posts)
11. I feel so bad for Justice Jackson, she never deserved to be thrown in with THEM!
Tue May 19, 2026, 11:07 AM
Yesterday

Our U.S. Constitution used to be the model for all countries to follow if they wanted true Democracy.
Chump and the Project 2025 group have besmirched and destroyed all of it, including our SCOTUS.

C Moon

(13,738 posts)
19. "Risks" ? "Seen" ?
Tue May 19, 2026, 12:24 PM
Yesterday

The rest of us have seen this for a more than a decade. If no sooner, at least with the screw up of President Obama’s swearing in.

electric_blue68

(27,326 posts)
24. Of course it's obvious; but I tend to agree w poster Baronchocula that she's being. ..
Tue May 19, 2026, 01:20 PM
Yesterday

mild mannered bc in public they rarely speak out against each other - while voicing their opinions on matters in their dissent.

I'm guessing she might be fuming, and hottified inside!

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ketanji Brown Jackson say...