This message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin) on Fri May 22, 2026, 05:02 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
SSJVegeta
(3,157 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(5,931 posts)Was that the Corporate Media was all in to tank Biden and boost Trump. Billionaires controlled the narrative.
Fiendish Thingy
(24,135 posts)My understanding is there was no discussion of Bidens decision to run for a second term and whether that was the best choice strategically, or whether an open primary without Biden would have given Dems a better chance of engaging voters, increasing turnout, and winning the White House.
dawn5651
(805 posts)it up and praised her to the hilt..
Slider19
(13 posts)I dont remember that happening. Thanks in advance
dawn5651
(805 posts)angry at biden for making the disastrous debate with krasnov all about biden and no support for her debate. while i dont consider myself a fan of harris even i admit she is a million times better than krasnov
blue-wave
(5,559 posts)Last edited Fri May 22, 2026, 02:47 AM - Edit history (1)
Let's release this flawed "autopsy" five months before the midterms. Great way to divide the Democratic Party!!
Who is really behind this?
BaronChocula
(4,771 posts)But it'll most likely be forgotten in a week. Any complaints anyone has about Dems, true or fictitious are being muted by the failure of this current corrupt, inept kleptocracy.
gopiscrap
(24,779 posts)lostincalifornia
(5,547 posts)slammed President Biden and VP Harris in such derogatory words by saying "endorsing Joe Biden for president would be like eating a "bowl of s**t", etc. along with a hostile media along with green party trolls only too eager to push division among Democrats.
This started in 2000 with the nader groupies "no difference between Democrats and republicans", culminated in 2016 against Hillary and our losing the Supreme Court, and finalized in 2024.
QueerDuck
(1,948 posts)IWNN, YKWIM.
angrychair
(12,545 posts)There is no legitimate way to have an honest discussion on this subject.
People sure don't mind shitting on progressives and blaming them in connection with this report and that's ok but there is no way to have an open discussion on this subject.
pat_k
(13,882 posts)I fear that in my 47 years as an adult member of the Democratic Party (not counting babysitting so people could get to the polls to vote for McGovern when I was 12), I have never seen "us" get this one right.
Either unity is demanded, and enforced inside the beltway on things that require more internal debate. Or we fall into circular firing squad mode when unity is absolutely called for to oppose a Republican threat.
And in re: 2024. I can't tell you how many arguments I had with my step-father throughout 2022 and into 2023. I was adamant that Biden should absolutely NOT run. He accused me of being ageist and made the case that Biden was our best shot.
When Biden announced his intention to run for a second term I cried. I felt betrayed. He was breaking his promise to be a "bridge" to a new generation of leaders. And we had some fantastic leaders "on the bench." But I pulled myself together and tried to internalize some of those "he's our best shot" arguments from my step-father.
I refrained from posting my fears. I did my best to be upbeat. But the dread never left me. A couple months before the fateful debate, my step-father raised the subject. He said I had been right. He'd been watching Biden on the campaign trail. He said he agreed that Biden shouldn't have run, and he was scared as hell that it was a fatal mistake for the Democratic Party. I did the "brave face" thing and touted all I could find that was going "for us." But I felt the same dread.
I'm not sure where this leaves me. Angry at the party for falling into an "It's his turn, his decision" stance and silencing any critic or challenge? Angry that the party didn't get behind him 100%? I don't know.
But I can't say that I didn't have a hell of a lot of sympathy for people who started calling on him to drop out.
betsuni
(29,306 posts)Negative media coverage, anti-Democratic propaganda from all directions, voter suppression. Swimming upstream and the swimmer is blamed if they can't win.
fujiyamasan
(2,060 posts)It really doesnt say anything new and posts about it arent either.
The report doesnt focus on any particular policies. It doesnt say what the party can do to improve its standing overall. Its just another grift, written by a bunch of highly paid consultants.
Just some fodder for the chattering class. I can see why Martin didnt want to release it. Then again, why commission this, if it was always going to be such an exercise in futility? It sounds like no one wants to face tough facts or admit that major mistakes were made, and they go back pretty far.
Aussie105
(8,187 posts)The candidates need to make their own noise, their own mark on the electorate.
Harris did her best - the electorate wasn't listening, wasn't ready for a female president.
Same happened to the previous female 'almost' president.
https://www.thoughtco.com/women-who-ran-for-president-3529994
"More than 50 women have sought to occupy the highest office in the land."
America, the land of the free - and the land of racists and 'never a female president' misogynism.
Strange - other countries look for competence, not skin color or gender.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.