Bipartisan House bill would ban use of federal money for DOJ's "anti-weaponization" fund
Source: CBS News
Updated on: May 21, 2026 / 8:28 PM EDT
Washington Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Democratic Rep. Tom Suozzi of New York introduced a bill Thursday to ban the use of federal money for paying out claims from the Justice Department's new "anti-weaponization" fund.
The bill, titled the Bipartisan Transparency for American Taxpayers Act, comes as Republicans fight over the nearly $1.8 billion fund that was established to compensate people who claim they were improperly targeted or investigated by the government. Allies and supporters of the president, including some of those involved in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, have said they plan to submit claims for payouts.
The fund was created as part of a settlement of a suit by President Trump against the IRS over a leak of his tax returns, a highly unusual arrangement that has elicited strong criticism from Democrats and a growing number of Republicans on Capitol Hill.
Fitzpatrick and Suozzi's two-page bill says "no federal funds
may be used for the payment of any claim submitted to the Anti-Weaponization Fund, established by the Department of Justice on May 18, 2026." "Congress has a constitutional responsibility to protect taxpayer dollars and oversee federal spending," Fitzpatrick said in a statement. "Taxpayer dollars will not become a discretionary payout fund. Transparency is not optional. Accountability is not negotiable."
Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doj-fund-house-bill-fitzpatrick-suozzi/
bucolic_frolic
(55,875 posts)They have to forbid payments to convicted felon crooks and criminals. He'll just divert some safety net money if they don't restrict everything.
What kind of boobs run Congress?
Icanthinkformyself
(427 posts)performance politics from a corporate Dem who is out of touch with the Dem base, as are most of the Dem leadership, and a member of the Guardians Of Pedophiles party.
FakeNoose
(42,466 posts)I believe the House and Senate members should all be docked for 2 weeks' pay, but that's another issue.
Griefbird
(141 posts)The suit was dropped, no judge was involved. No, it's a bank robbery. It's infuriating that msm continues to refer to it as a settlement when they should, at minimum, call it an illegal use of federal funds.
oldsoldierfadingfast
(383 posts)Did not Congress adjourn before a vote re: this could be brought to the House floor?
BumRushDaShow
(172,425 posts)The one they fled from was a DHS/ICE appropriation (with added-on ballroom money since removed) using the reconciliation process to go around the 60-vote Rule in the Senate.
The OP bill is to forbid self-dealing by stopping any funding from going to that farcical "anti-weaponization" crap "settlement", and that self-dealing and promises to dish out money to criminals, just made things worse