U.S. bombing Iran for second straight night
Source: axios
updated 1 hour ago - Barak Ravid
The U.S. military launched strikes on Iran for the second consecutive evening. U.S. officials say the intent is to pressure Tehran to sign a deal, but the strikes also carry a risk of military escalation.
The big picture: U.S. officials expect an Iranian response, possibly targeting U.S. bases, as took place on Tuesday night. President Trump has accused Tehran of "playing us for suckers" in negotiations, and decided something had to give.
U.S. Central Command said the strikes began at 5:15 p.m. ET "against multiple targets in Iran... in response to Iran's unwarranted and continued aggression."
A U.S. official told Axios all the targets were in southern Iran and include air defense systems, radars and drone command and control units.
Driving the news: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told reporters during a visit to CENTCOM headquarters in Florida that "CENTCOM will be busy tonight because we are going to hit Iran hard."....................
Read more: https://www.axios.com/2026/06/10/trump-iran-strike-situation-room-meeting
Link to tweet
?s=20
UpInArms
(55,539 posts)Started a war of aggression
Nothing had been done to cause this
It was by tfgs choice
I can only hope he dies a miserable death
AloeVera
(4,555 posts)Including 600 schools and close to 300 medical facilities.
I guess that's what "hitting hard" means for war criminals.
I don't know why media doesn't talk about that.
tonekat
(2,586 posts)Stupid, mean-spirited, unnecessary.
May he suffer at his end.
pat_k
(14,246 posts)The psychopath is clueless on the meaning of "proportional response." He believes he must "one up" them. And they remain capable of exacting "an eye for an eye" with lower tech attacks on gulf neighbors and US assets.
And, the reality is that the ONLY person standing in the way of an agreement is the felon himself.
He will NEVER make the necessarily humiliating deal -- a deal he knows will paint a giant L for Loser on this forehead.
Every week that passes, it becomes clearer that he will continue to demand that his so-called "negotiators" get a "better deal" -- one that doesn't mean recommitting to Obama's treaty, shoveling 10x the amount of money at Iran that Obama did, and an "environmental fee" (i.e., toll).
Unfortunately, more competent folk than his morons wouldn't be able to craft a way out that isn't effectively a declaration of surrender and declaration that the treaty negotiated over two years by the Obama administration, which was supported by allies -- a treaty the felon ripped to shreds -- was the best deal possible. And being "better than" Obama is a grandiose fantasy that keeps his eggshell ego from complete collapse. He is incapable of accepting reality on that.
As long as his psychopathic and narcissistic defenses against reality hold, that WILL NOT happen. He'll demand a "better deal" that will never happen.
All the while, the global and domestic harms and chaos of the war will escalate.
As I've said before, this is unsustainable. A breaking point will be reached and more and more of those currently sticking by him will give up the fantasy that the war will magically be resolved "any day now."
Perhaps it will take a rout in the midterms to wake more up, but sooner or later, we are going to see groups of trumpublicans in the Senate and House who "get" that the ONLY way out is if he is gone tramping to the White House to push for a face-saving resignation for "health reasons" so J.D. can make the humiliating deal.
Crazily, even the Kalshi market seems to be getting this. I wanted to place a bet on 'No deal" before 2027 late in May, but ran into roadblocks transferring money. At the time, the probability of "no deal" was around 30%. When I finally got my account funded "No" was about 60% (Yes 42 cents/No 60 cents to win a buck if it resolves that way). I would bet on no deal before 2028, but I fully expect him to have been removed one way or another by then so J.D. can make the deal.
Not to read too much into these betting markets, but it appears I'm not the only one that "gets" the felon is incapable sucking up the loss to end the damage his criminal war is doing.