Graham 'concerned' that Iran views deal with U.S. differently than Trump administration
Source: The Hill
06/14/26 10:00 PM ET
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham (S.C.) said Sunday that he is concerned that the U.S. and Iranian governments have different views of the deal that the two sides have agreed to.
I am pleased to hear the memorandum of understanding with Iran to allow the Strait of Hormuz to open has been agreed to. I will be watching closely the ensuing negotiations regarding Irans nuclear program and other matters, Graham, an Iran hawk, wrote on social platform X.
I am somewhat concerned that Irans view of the agreement seems different than what the American negotiating team is claiming, the South Carolina Republican added.
President Trump announced the deal earlier Sunday afternoon, signaling a potential end to a three-and-a-half-month conflict with the Islamic Republic.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5923946-lindsey-graham-iran-deal/
He has joined the official "Susan Collins Concern Club" (SCCC) as he watches his fever dream fade away.
rampartd
(5,398 posts)gab13by13
(32,983 posts)2 peace agreements -
1 agreement that Iran signs and a separate agreement that Krasnov signs, then after 60 days the 2 agreements need to be reconciled.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
2 countries have already signed agreements with Iran to pay tolls to travel through Hormuz. Will those agreements be nullified?
In the meantime the price of crude and gasoline drops to make Magats happy on the 4th of July.
BumRushDaShow
(173,087 posts)It"s basically a "Memorandum of Understanding" of next steps that are stipulated to happen over the next 2 months while they continue to negotiate, where during that time, hostilities will temporarily cease and Hormuz will purportedly reopen.
lonely bird
(3,097 posts)It does state that hostilities are permanently ended. This, of course, is a question begging term. If the ongoing negotiations do not go well or end with and actual agreement I can very easily see hostilities resuming. Since the MOU covers Lebanon as well we have to count on Bibi honoring that. Since Bibis motives are not arbitrarily aligned with ours this may upset the AppleCare as well.
BumRushDaShow
(173,087 posts)and a lot of bombing can happen between now and then, and the Houthis (who claim to control access to the Red Sea via the Gulf of Aden and who have made threats to escalate) have not even been mentioned yet.
![]()

lonely bird
(3,097 posts)These clowns cant negotiate their way out of a wet paper bag.
Bengus81
(10,488 posts)Thanks Jackie!
Amaryllis
(11,510 posts)Hugin
(38,064 posts)The whole thing has degenerated into a running con.
Any deal reached will undoubtedly contain a trap for subsequent administrations or Democratic majorities similar to what was arranged with the Taliban in Afghanistan. Whatever it is, it will only benefit Trumps indulging self interests.
Lovie777
(24,206 posts)and what about the high cost of living?
Just not about the gas prices which honestly I dont see it go down much if any.
We are in the Twilight Zone.
Raven123
(7,991 posts)Clutches pearls, then does as told.
gab13by13
(32,983 posts)is more than the vast majority of Congressional Magats are doing.
Raven123
(7,991 posts)He criticized Trump over the J6 events and then groveled back into Trumps orbit. Personally, I will watch his actions and ignore his words.
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,337 posts)..."He has joined the official "Susan Collins Concern Club" (SCCC) as he watches his fever dream fade away."
Was mentioned!
Cheezoholic
(4,066 posts)It's as accurate as a nuclear clock
AverageOldGuy
(4,309 posts)Well bully for you.
Maybe you should have grown a pair four months ago and told Trump NO WAR ON IRAN. But that would have required you to take a stand and we all know that wont happen.
BumRushDaShow
(173,087 posts)LymphocyteLover
(10,329 posts)is it possible he sees we bit off more than we can chew? Is his seat in danger?
BumRushDaShow
(173,087 posts)and McCain had that role in the past. Now he has no one but his dear leader for his orders.
cab67
(3,880 posts)Random Boomer
(4,421 posts)Graham is in favor of the war, and would probably applaud ground troops in Iran or nuking them. If he had "grown a pair" and taken a stand -- based on what he truly believes -- he'd be lambasting Trump for capitulating to Iran and just walking away from the whole mess he created.