Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(173,257 posts)
Fri Jun 19, 2026, 05:30 AM 9 hrs ago

States aren't required to provide community-based care for people with disabilities, new DOJ opinion claims

Source: CBS News

June 18, 2026 / 6:21 PM EDT


The Justice Department released a new legal opinion Thursday that civil rights experts said represents a significant attack against people with mental, physical and intellectual disabilities who receive state-funded services.

The Office of Legal Counsel opinion said states are not actually required by law to integrate mentally disabled patients with their peers by providing community or home-based care, a finding experts say runs counter to long-standing legal precedent and would lead to greater rates of institutionalizing people with disabilities.

The OLC opinion, authored by Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Lanora Pettit and posted on the DOJ's website, reinterprets a long-standing Supreme Court case that has served as a cornerstone of America's disability rights law. That 1999 case, Olmstead v. LC, held that people with disabilities are entitled to receive services in their communities, rather than an institution.

"The Olmstead decision itself said that why community integration is so important is so children can be part of their families, so they can go to school, so people can be part of their communities," said Alison Barkoff, a former DOJ attorney who was in charge of supervising Olmstead civil rights enforcement and now works as a professor at George Washington University's Milken Institute School of Public Health. "That's what's at stake with this re-interpretation of Olmstead."

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doj-disability-opinion-community-care/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
States aren't required to provide community-based care for people with disabilities, new DOJ opinion claims (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 9 hrs ago OP
EVERY life is sacred... except for those disabled or otherwise "othered"? Tim S 8 hrs ago #1
The cruelty is the point... 2naSalit 7 hrs ago #2
Next step: Thr happy-painted party truck with the exhaust system fed into the back. NBachers 6 hrs ago #3
Sure looks ominous mountain grammy 6 hrs ago #7
Who asked the DoJ to make a new ruling on this? FakeNoose 6 hrs ago #4
Absolutely! Delphinus 6 hrs ago #6
This reeks... GiqueCee 6 hrs ago #5
Yep duckworth969 5 hrs ago #10
Back to warehousing in place of home based care Historic NY 6 hrs ago #8
such fine Christians azureblue 5 hrs ago #9
They keep screaming, "we're not Nazis,..." IrishAfricanAmerican 4 hrs ago #11
Remember, Congress never fully funded IDEA delisen 4 hrs ago #12
Reverse Genetic Engineering. Buddyzbuddy 3 hrs ago #13

FakeNoose

(42,889 posts)
4. Who asked the DoJ to make a new ruling on this?
Fri Jun 19, 2026, 08:15 AM
6 hrs ago

This is total bullshit and goes against 50+ years of precedent.

GiqueCee

(4,998 posts)
5. This reeks...
Fri Jun 19, 2026, 08:19 AM
6 hrs ago

... of the influence of Stephen Miller and Russell Vought, two of the vilest perversions of humanity ever spawned.

azureblue

(2,766 posts)
9. such fine Christians
Fri Jun 19, 2026, 08:46 AM
5 hrs ago

Matthew 25: 41 - 46, Jesus speaks
41 “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.
42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink,
43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’
44 “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’
45 “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’
46 “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”

IrishAfricanAmerican

(4,539 posts)
11. They keep screaming, "we're not Nazis,..."
Fri Jun 19, 2026, 09:45 AM
4 hrs ago

but they keep pushing Nazi policies. Every time I hear a MAGA say, "Well, I don't really like Trump, but I like his policies," well, these are his policies. No money for "useless eaters." Straight our of the Nazi playbook. Project 2025 is, at its heart, a Nazi program.

delisen

(7,489 posts)
12. Remember, Congress never fully funded IDEA
Fri Jun 19, 2026, 09:50 AM
4 hrs ago

This failure placed financial burdens on all public school systems and gave the opening to those already so inclined to attack education for disabled students . It also fueled resentment of children with disabilities.

Project 2025 has a strong eugenics component. When Trump ridiculed a disabled reporter during a political rally he was not just making a personal statement of contempt, he was deliberately messaging his base that he is for ending community services and protections for disabled people.

The next 4 years are the most critical for people who are considered disabled. It will be either full community services with liberty and justice for all or closed profit-making institutions.

Buddyzbuddy

(3,019 posts)
13. Reverse Genetic Engineering.
Fri Jun 19, 2026, 10:56 AM
3 hrs ago

No, you may not prevent this torment with an abortion. But we, of this Administration will be happy to assist in the torment of any disabled that are produced. Just for kicks and giggles, you understand.

Signed, S. Rat Face Miller!

They are such f*cking monsters.

G'damn every Dem who does not come after the billionaires and trillionaire money hard and fast. THEY ARE THE REASON.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»States aren't required to...